Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Understanding the nineteenth century origins of disciplines: lessons for astrobiology today?

  • William J. Brazelton (a1) (a2) and Woodruff T. Sullivan (a1) (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Astrobiology's goal of promoting interdisciplinary research is an attempt to reverse a trend that began two centuries ago with the formation of the first specialized scientific disciplines. We have examined this era of discipline formation in order to make a comparison with the situation today in astrobiology. Will astrobiology remain interdisciplinary or is it becoming yet another specialty?

As a case study, we have investigated effects on the scientific literature when a specialized community is formed by analyzing the citations within papers published during 1802–1856 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Phil. Trans.), the most important ‘generalist’ journal of its day, and Transactions of the Geological Society of London (Trans. Geol. Soc.), the first important disciplinary journal in the sciences. We find that these two journals rarely cited each other, and papers published in Trans. Geol. Soc. cited fewer interdisciplinary sources than did geology papers in Phil. Trans. After geology had become established as a successful specialized discipline, geologists returned to publishing papers in Phil. Trans., but they wrote in the new, highly specialized style developed in Trans. Geol. Soc. They had succeeded in not only creating a new scientific discipline, but also a new way of doing science with its own modes of research and communication.

A similar citation analysis was applied to papers published over the period 2001–2008 in the contemporary journals Astrobiology and the International Journal of Astrobiology to test the hypothesis that astrobiologists are in the early stages of creating their own specialized community. Although still too early to reliably detect any but the largest trends, there is no evidence yet that astrobiologists are drifting into their own isolated discipline. Instead, to date they appear to remain interdisciplinary.

Copyright
Corresponding author
email: braz@u.washington.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. Allen , J. Qin & F.W. Lancaster (1994). Soc. Stud. Sci. 24, 279310.

D.J. Des Marais (2008). Astrobiology 8, 715730.

D. Edge (1979). Hist. Sci. 17, 102134.

P. George (1952). Ann. Sci. 8, 302322.

J. Morrell & A. Thackray (1981). Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

J. Qin (1994). Scientometrics 29, 219238.

M.J.S. Rudwick (1976). Hist. Sci. 14, 149195.

M.J.S. Rudwick (1985). The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

M.J.S. Rudwick (2005). Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

J.T. Staley (2003). Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 347354.

H.B. Woodward (1907). The history of the Geological Society of London. Geological Society, London.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Astrobiology
  • ISSN: 1473-5504
  • EISSN: 1475-3006
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-astrobiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.