Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-19T06:37:52.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Genocide and Restitution: The Early Wave of Jewish Cultural Restitution in the Aftermath of World War II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2020

Leora Bilsky
Leora Bilsky*
Affiliation:
Full Professor, Faculty of Law; Benno Gitter Chair in Human Rights and Holocaust Research; Director, Minerva Center for Human Rights, Tel Aviv University; Email: bilskyl@tauex.tau.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cultural restitution in international law typically aims to restore cultural property to the state of origin. The experience of World War II raised the question of how to adapt this framework to deal with states that persecuted cultural groups within their own borders. Nazi Germany’s persecution of Jews and its attempt to destroy their cultural heritage began before the war and was carried out systematically throughout the war in the conquered territories. After the war, the Polish Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin advocated for the recognition of the new crime of genocide and, in particular, its cultural dimensions. Jewish organizations also argued that cultural destruction should be seen as an integral component of the crime of genocide and that the remedy of cultural restitution should be part of the effort to rehabilitate the injured group, but their efforts to gain recognition in the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg for the unique harm suffered by the Jews were unsuccessful. This article discusses an innovative approach developed by Jewish jurists and scholars in the late 1940s and 1950s, according to which heirless cultural property was returned to Jewish organizations as trustees for the Jewish people. Though largely forgotten in the annals of law, this approach offers a promising model for international law to overcome its statist bias and recognize the critical importance of cultural heritage for the rehabilitation of (non-state) victim groups.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , August 2020 , pp. 349 - 374
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article grew out of a lecture I delivered in the framework of the Rose and Isaac Ebel Lecture on the Holocaust at Princeton University in March 2019. I would like to thank the participants for their insightful comments (in particular, to Leora Batnitzki and William Forbath). For comments on earlier drafts, I thank Rachel Klagsbrun, Rivka Brot, Natalie Davidson, and Ana Filipa Vrdoljak, and the participants in the Yad Vashem workshop on the practice of restitution and reparations and the historiography of the Holocaust. I thank Amnon Morag for his research assistance and Philippa Shimrat for her help in editing. The Israel Science Foundation supported this research under Grant no. 1163/19.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abtahi, Hirad, and Webb, Philippa. 2008. The Genocide Convention: The Travaux Préparatoires. Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amit, Gish. 2014. E ḳ s libris: hisṭoriyah shel gezel, shimur ṿe-nikhus ba-Sifriyah ha-leʼumit bi-Yerushalayim [Ex Libris: Chronicles of theft, preservation, and appropriation at the Jewish National Library]. Tel Aviv: Van Leer/Hakibbutz Hameuchad [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Arendt, Hanna, and Scholem, Gershom. 2017. The Correspondence of Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem, edited by Knott, Marie Luise, translated by David, Anthony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Salo. 1942. The Effect of the War on Jewish Community Life. New York: Harry L. Glucksman Memorial Committee.Google Scholar
Baron, Salo. 1945. “The Spiritual Reconstruction of European Jewry.” Commentary 1, no. 1: 4–12.Google Scholar
Bentwich, Norman. 1956. International Aspects of Restitution and Compensation for Victims of the Nazis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilsky, Leora, and Klagsbrun, Rachel. 2018. “The Return of Cultural Genocide?” European Journal of International Law 29, no. 2: 373–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloxham, Donald. 2001. Genocide on Trial: War Crimes Trials and the Formation of Holocaust History and Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Columbia Law Review . 1961. “Origins and Development of Modern Escheat.” 61, no. 7: 1319–40.Google Scholar
Dean, Martin, Goschler, Constantin, and Ther, Philipp, eds. 2007. Robbery and Restitution: The Conflict over Jewish Property in Europe. New York: Bergham Books.Google Scholar
Douglas, Lawrence. 2001. The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, David E. 2017. The Book Smugglers: Partisans, Poets, and the Race to Save Jewish Treasures from the Nazis. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Gallas, Elisabeth. 2012. “Preserving East European Jewish Culture: Lucy Dawidowicz and the Salvage of Books after the Holocaust.” Jahrbuch Des Simon-Dubnow-Instituts Simon Dubnow Institute Yearbook 11: 73–92.Google Scholar
Gallas, Elisabeth. 2015. “Locating the Jewish Future: The Restoration of Looted Cultural Property in Early Postwar Europe.” Naharaim 9, no. 1–2: 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallas, Elisabeth. 2019. A Mortuary of Books: The Rescue of Jewish Culture after the Holocaust. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gaster, Theodor H. 1945. “Foundations of Jewish Cultural Reconstruction in Europe.” Journal of Educational Sociology 18, no. 5: 267–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glickman, Mark. 2016. Stolen Words: The Nazi Plunder of Jewish Books. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press: 158-166.Google Scholar
Herman, Dana. 2008. “Hashavat Avedah: A History of Jewish Cultural Reconstruction, Inc.” PhD diss., McGill University, Montreal, http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=99925&silo_library=GEN01 (accessed 7 September 2020).Google Scholar
Hirsch, Francine. 2020. Soviet Judgment at Nuremberg: A New History of the International Military Tribunal after World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jockusch, Laura. 2012. “Justice at Nuremberg? Jewish Responses to Nazi War-Crime Trials in Allied-Occupied Germany.” Jewish Social Studies 19, no. 1: 107–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Michael J. 1998. “Resolving a Dilemma: The Inheritance of Jewish Property.” Cardozo Law Review 20, no. 2: 625–56.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Michael. 2009. America and the return of Nazi Contraband: The Recovery of Europe’s Cultural Treasures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leff, Lisa M. 2015. The Archive Thief: The Man Who Salvaged French Jewish History in the Wake of the Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemkin, Raphael. 1944. Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Lemkin, Raphael. 1946. “Genocide.” American Scholar 15, no. 2: 227–30.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark. 2014. The Birth of the New Justice: The Internationalization of Crime and Punishment, 1919–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeffler, James. 2017 “Becoming Cleopatra: The Forgotten Zionism of Raphael Lemkin.” Journal of Genocide Research 19, no. 3: 340–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustig, Jason. 2017. “Who Are to Be the Successors of European Jewry? The Restitution of German Jewish Communal and Cultural Property.” Journal of Contemporary History 52, no. 3: 519–45.Google Scholar
Marrus, Michael R. 1998. “The Holocaust at Nuremberg.” Yad Vashem Studies 26: 1–41.Google Scholar
Marrus, Michael R. 2009. Some Measure of Justice: The Holocaust Era Restitution Campaign of the 1990s. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Merryman, John H. 1986. “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property.” American Journal of International Law 80, no. 4: 831–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John H. 1989. “The Public Interest in Cultural Property.” California Law Review 77, no. 2: 339–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morsink, Johannes. 1999. “Cultural Genocide, the Universal Declaration, and Minority Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 21, no. 4: 1009–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, A. Dirk. 2008. “Empire, Colony, Genocide: Keywords and the Philosophy of History.” In Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History, edited by Dirk Moses, A., 3–54. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Moses, A. Dirk. 2010. “Lemkin, Culture, and the Concept of Genocide.” In The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies, edited by Bloxham, Donald and Moses, Dirk, 19–41. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Moses, Siegfried. 1944. Jewish Post-War Claims. Tel Aviv: Irgun Olej Merkaz Eropa.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. Forthcoming. “From Aggression to Atrocity: Rethinking the History of International Law.” In Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law, edited by Heller, K. J. et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2805952 (accessed 7 September 2020).Google Scholar
Munz, Ernest. 1943. “ Restitution in Postwar Europe.” Contemporary Jewish Records 6, no. 4: 371–80.Google Scholar
Novic, Elisa. 2016. The Concept of Cultural Genocide: An International Law Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Thérèse. 2011. “The Restitution of Holocaust Looted Art and Transitional Justice: The Perfect Storm or the Raft of the Medusa?” European Journal of International Law 22, no. 1: 49–80.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jacob. 1972. “The International Military Tribunal and the Holocaust: Some Legal Reflections.” Israel Law Review 7, no. 1: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Nehemiah. 1944. Indemnification and Reparations: Jewish Aspects. New York: Institute of Jewish Affairs of the American Jewish Congress and World Jewish Congress.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2009. Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schidorsky, Dov. 2006. “The Salvaging of Jewish Books in Europe after the Holocaust: The Efforts of the Hebrew University and of the Jewish National and University Library – Success and Failure.” In Jüdischer Buchbesitz als Raubgut, 197–212. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Schidorsky, Dov. 2008. Gevilim nisrafim ve-otiyot porhot: Toldotehem shel osfei sefarim ve-sifriyot be-Erets Yisrael ve-nisyonot le-hatsalat seridehem be-Eropah le’ahar ha-shoah [Burning scrolls and flying letters: The history of book collections and libraries in the Land of Israel and the attempts to rescue their remnants in Europe after the Holocaust]. Jerusalem: Magnes.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1986. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Elizabeth, ed. 1997. The Spoils of War, World War II and Its Aftermath: The Loss, Reappearance and Recovery of Cultural Property. New York: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
Smit, Anneke. 2013. The Property Rights of Refuges and Internally Displaced Persons: Beyond Restitution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stamatoudi, Irini A. 2011. Cultural Property Law and Restitution: A Commentary to International Conventions and European Union Law. London: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiller, Alexa. 2014. “Semantics of Extermination. The Use of the New Term of Genocide in the Nuremberg Trials and the Genesis of a Master Narrative.” In Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals: Transitional Justice, Trial Narratives, and Historiography, edited by Stiller, Alexa and Priemel, Kim C., 104–33. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Sutzkever, Abraham. 2015. Haruzim Shehorim [], edited by Mar, Benny. Israel: Hakibbutz Hameuhad.Google Scholar
Sznaider, Natan. 2011. Jewish Memory and the Cosmopolitan Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Takei, Ayaka. 2002. “The ‘Gemeinde Problem’: The Jewish Restitution Successor Organization and the Postwar Jewish Communities in Germany 1947–1954.” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 16, no. 2: 266–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veraart, Wouter J. 2016. “Two Rounds of Postwar Restitution and Dignity Restoration in the Netherlands and France.” Law & Social Inquiry 41, no. 4: 956–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa. 2006. International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa. 2011. “Genocide and Restitution: Ensuring Each Group’s Contribution to Humanity.” European Journal of International Law 22, no. 1: 17–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, Robert. 2002. “Returning Jewish Cultural Property: The Handling of Books Looted by the Nazis in the American Zone of Occupation, 1945–1952.” Libraries & Culture 37, no. 3: 213–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Bruno. 1946. “Review of Indemnifications and Reparations, Jewish Aspects, by Nehemiah Robinson; Jewish Post-War Claims, by Siegfried Moses; Vergeltung und Wiedergutmachung in Deutschland, by Louis C. Bial; Problemas de Post-Guerra en el Transcurso de los Tiempos, by Herbert Dorn.” American Journal of International Law 40, no. 1: 221–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoff, Noam. 2015. Gershom Scholem: From Berlin to Jerusalem and Back. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Zweig, Ronald W. 1988. “Restitution and the Problem of Jewish Displaced Persons in Anglo-American Relations 1944–1948.” American Jewish History 78, no. 1: 54–78.Google Scholar