Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:57:52.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Fractured Resemblances”: Contested Multinational Heritage and Soft Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2020

Sarah Sargent
Sarah Sargent*
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Buckingham, United Kingdom. Email: Sarah.Sargent@buckingham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Intangible cultural heritage elements are shared across state borders. In many instances, states join in multinational nominations to inscribe the heritage element in a way that reflects this reality. But, at times, states are unwilling or unable to cooperate in a mutual nomination that reflects the shared nature of the heritage element. The consequence of this is that heritage elements can then be nominated by individual states without any reflection of the multinational or cross-border nature of the element; thus leaving the heritage elements shorn of this aspect of their nature. The current international heritage legal regime, through the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, does not adequately acknowledge or address this problem. This article, through a case study of the successful nomination by Azerbaijan of the horseback game of chovqan, examines the causes and consequences of these “fractured resemblances.” It analyzes the links between cultural heritage, conflict, and the use of heritage as a form of soft power. It focuses on the use of single-state inscription as a soft-power means of obtaining international prestige and support and the resultant effects on shared cultural heritage elements. From this, suggestions for changes to international heritage laws for the inscription of cultural heritage are suggested to accommodate the reality of the connection between cultural heritage, conflict, and power and to avoid the occurrence of “fractured resemblances” of heritage shared across state lines.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 97 - 123
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abbasov, Shahin. 2013. “Azerbaijan and Iran: Wrestling over Polo-like Game,” Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/azerbaijan-and-iran-wrestling-over-polo-like-game (accessed 18 February 2020).Google Scholar
Aykan, Bahar. 2014 “Whose Tradition, Whose Identity? The Politics of Constructing ‘Nevruz’ as Intangible Cultural Heritage in Turkey.” European Journal of Turkish Studies 19: 1–24. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d7dd/8b1d21c4403cdb28b4a4d2ffc7a502367744.pdf (accessed 23 February 2020).Google Scholar
Aykan, Bahar. 2015. “‘Patenting’ Karagoz: UNESCO, Nationalism and Multinational Intangible Heritage.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 10: 949–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, Matthias, Radeloff, Volker, Avedian, Vahagn, and Kuemmerle, Tobias. 2014. “Land-Use Change in the Caucasus during and after the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict.” Regional Environmental Change 15, no. 8: 1703–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bille, Mikkel. 2011. “Assembling Heritage: Investigating the UNESCO Proclamation of Bedouin Intangible Heritage in Jordan.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, no. 2: 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Alan. 2007. “The Foreign Policy Potential of ‘Small State Soft Power’ Information Strategies.” https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/41ed/d4c92c1b7a2067f5b21acd02d74bff3c60bc.pdf (accessed 21 February 2020).Google Scholar
Cornell, Svante. 2011. Azerbaijan Since Independence. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Elhusseini, Fadi. 2016. “Soft Power in the Middle East: The Invisible Skirmish.” E-International Relations. http://www.e-ir.info/2016/08/08/soft-power-in-the-middle-east-the-invisible-skirmish/ (accessed 21 February 2020).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Josephine. 2017. “Heritage and Human Rights: Reframing the Conservation Ethic.” In Heritage, Culture and Rights, edited by Durbach, A. and Lixinski, L., 165–80. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 1999. “Identity as a Scarce Resource” Social Anthropology 7, no. 3: 239–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2003. “Cultural Differences as Denied Resemblance: Reconsidering Nationalism and Ethnicity.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 45, no. 2: 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Vincent, and Kaczmarksa, Katarzyna. 2019. “Conservative Soft Power: Liberal Soft Power Bias and the ‘Hidden’ Attraction of Russia.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22, no. 1: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucera, Joshua. 2018. “For Armenians, They’re Not Occupied Territories—They’re the Homeland.” Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/for-armenians-theyre-not-occupied-territories-theyre-the-homeland (accessed 21 February 2020).Google Scholar
Leiboff, Marett. 2001. “Clashing Things.” Griffith Law Review 10: 294–316.Google Scholar
Lixinksi, Lucas, Bordin, Fernando Lusa, and de Souza Schmitz, Maite. 2011. “Identity Beyond Borders: International Cultural Heritage Law and the Temple of Preah Vihear Dispute.” International Law Students Association Quarterly 20, no. 1: 30–37.Google Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas, and Ombre, Luci. 2013. “The Bright and Dark Sides of International Heritage Law.” Italian Yearbook of International Law Online 22, no. 1: 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, Christina, and Kersel, Morag. 2013. US Cultural Diplomacy and Archaelogy: Soft Power, Hard Heritage. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melissen, Jan. 2005. “Wielding Soft Power: The New Public Diplomacy.” Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael Diplomacy Papers 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Meskell, Lynn. 2014. “States of Conservation: Protection, Politics, and Pacting within UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee.” Anthropological Quarterly 87, no. 1: 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, Lynn. 2015. “Transacting UNESCO World Heritage Gifts and Exchanges on the World Stage.” Social Anthropology 23, no. 1: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezey, Naomi. 2007. “The Paradoxes of Cultural Property.” Columbia Law Review 107: 2004–46.Google Scholar
Mooradian, Moorad, and Druckman, Daniel. 1999. “Hurting Stalemate or Mediation? The Conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh 1990–1995.” Journal of Peace Research 36, no. 6: 709–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najafizadeh, Mehrangiz. 2013. “Ethnic Conflict and Forced Displacement: Narratives of Azeri IDP and Refugee Women from the Nagorno-Karabahk War.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 1, no. 14: 161–83.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph. 1990. “Soft Power.” Foreign Policy 80: 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Loughin, John, Kolossov, Vladimir, and Toal, Gerard. 2014. “Inside the Post-Soviet de facto States: A Comparison of Attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 55, no. 4: 423–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Loughlin, John, and Kolosov, Vladimir. 2018. “Building Identities in post-Soviet ‘de facto states’: Cultural and Political Icons in Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia, Transdniestria, and Abkhazia.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 58, no. 6: 691–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Richard. 2006. “From Cultural Exchange to Transculturation: A Review and Reconceptualization of Transculturation.” Communication Theory 16, no. 4: 474–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Michael. 2017. “Strategies Underlying Iranian Soft Power.” American Enterprise Institute. http://www.aei.org/publication/strategies-underlying-iranian-soft-power/ (accessed 21 February 2020).Google Scholar
Schreiber, Hannah. 2017. “Intangible Cultural Heritage and Soft Power: Exploring the Relationship.” International Journal of Intangible Heritage 12: 44–57.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1999. Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Laurajane. 2006. The Uses of Heritage. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubertazzi, Benedetta. 2015. “The Territorial Condition for the Inscription of Elements on the UNESCO Lists of Intangible Cultural Heritage.” In Between Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice Participation, Territory and the Making of Heritage, edited by Adell, Nicolas, Bendix, Regina F., Bortolotto, Chiara, and Tauschek, Markus, 111–22. Gottingen: Gottingen University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Stephanie. 2019. “‘Soft Power is Such a Benign Animal’: Narrative Power and the Reification of Concepts in Japan.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32, no. 4: 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar