Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

How Participatory is Participatory Heritage Management? The Politics of Safeguarding the Alevi Semah Ritual as Intangible Heritage

  • Bahar Aykan (a1)

Abstract:

This article addresses the shortcomings of UNESCO’s intangible heritage program in developing effective mechanisms for community participation in heritage management. Contrary to its original intentions, by prioritizing national perspectives and interests on heritage, UNESCO’s program inadvertently allows for strengthening the control of the state over the heritage of minorities and other marginalized groups. This article explores the complexities of state-led intangible heritage management, using the Semah ritual of Turkey’s Alevi religious groups as a case in point. I first detail how Alevi voices were silenced during Semah’s intangible heritage nomination process, despite those documents submitted by Turkey to UNESCO that claim Alevis’ active engagement and full support. Then I discuss in what ways the heritage making of Semah plays into the ongoing efforts of the Turkish government to integrate Alevis into dominant Sunni majority. I conclude by arguing that UNESCO’s intangible heritage program, though unintentionally, assists nondemocratic countries in their efforts to force marginalized groups to adopt the mainstream culture.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Adanali, Ahmet Hadi. “The Presidency of Religious Affairs and the Principle of Secularism in Turkey.” The Muslim World 98 (2008): 228–41.
Anico, Marta, and Peralta, Elsa. “Introduction.” In Heritage and Identity: Engagement and Demission in the Contemporary World, edited by Anico, Marta and Peralta, Elsa, 111. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Askew, Marc. “The Magic List of Global Status: UNESCO, World Heritage and the Agendas of States.” In Heritage and Globalisation, edited by Labadi, Sophia and Long, Colin, 1944. New York: Routledge, 2010.
Aykan, Bahar. “Intangible Heritage’s Uncertain Political Outcomes: Nationalism and the Remaking of Marginalized Cultural Practices in Turkey.” PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, 2012.
Aykan, Bahar. “UNESCO ve Kültürel Mirasın Milliyeti [UNESCO and Nationality of Cultural Heritage].” In Neye Yarar Hatıralar? Bellek ve Siyaset Çalışmaları, edited by Yelsalı Parmaksız, P. M., 303–37. Ankara: Phoenix, 2012.
Beazley, Olwen. “Politics and Power: The Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Genbaku Dome) as World Heritage.” In Heritage and Globalisation, edited by Labadi, Sophia and Long, Colin, 4565. New York: Routledge, 2010.
Blake, Janet. “UNESCO’s 2003 Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Implications of Community Involvement in ‘Safeguarding.’ ” In Intangible Heritage, edited by Smith, Laurajane and Akagawa, Natsuko, 4573. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Bozkurt, Fuat. Semahlar [The Semahs]. Istanbul: Kapı, 2007.
Byrne, Denis. “A Critique of Unfeeling Heritage.” In Intangible Heritage, edited by Smith, Laurajane and Akagawa, Natsuko, 229–52. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Cınar, Menderes. “The Justice and Development Party and the Kemalist Establishment.” In Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey, edited by Cizre, Ümit, 109–31. New York: Routledge, 2008.
De Cesari, Chiara. “World Heritage and Mosaic Universalism.” Journal of Social Archaeology 10, no. 3 (2010): 299324.
Dressler, Markus. “Public-Private Distinctions, the Alevi Question, and the Headscarf: Turkish Secularism Revisited.” In Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age, edited by Cady, Linell E. and Shakman Hurd, Elizabeth, 121–41. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Engelhardt, Richard. “UNESCO Presentation: Regional Perspectives.” In Promotion of the “Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity,” Final Report of 2002 Regional Workshop for Cultural Personnel in Asia and the Pacific, Tokyo, Japan, 1216 March, 2002, 2931. Tokyo: UNESCO, 2002.
Erdemir, Aykan. “Tradition and Modernity: Alevis’ Ambiguous Terms and Turkey’s Ambivalent Subjects.” Middle Eastern Studies 41, no. 6 (2005): 937–51.
Erman, Tahire, and Göker, Emrah. “Alevi Politics in Contemporary Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 36, no. 4 (2000): 99108.
Graham, Brian, Ashworth, G. J., and Tunbridge, J. E.. A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture, and Economy. London: Hodder Arnold, 2000.
Institute of Strategic Thinking. Alevi Raporu [The Alevi report]. Ankara: Öncü, 2009.
Jongerden, Joost. “Violation of Human Rights and the Alevis in Turkey.” In Turkey’s Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview, edited by White, Paul J. and Jongerden, Joost, 7189. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
Kenny, Mary Lorena. “Deeply Rooted in the Present: Making Heritage in Brazilian Quilombos.” In Intangible Heritage, edited by Smith, Laurajane and Akagawa, Natsuko, 151–68. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Lesser, Ian O. “Turkey: ‘Recessed’ Islamic Politics and Convergence with the West.” In The Muslim World after 9/11, edited by Rabasa, Angel, 175205. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2004.
Lixinski, Lucas. “Selecting Heritage: The Interplay of Art, Politics and Identity.” European Journal of International Law 22, no. 1 (2011): 81100.
Logan, William. “Protecting the Tay Nguyen Gongs: Conflicting Rights in Vietnam’s Central Plateau.” In Cultural Diversity, Heritage and Human Rights, edited by Langfield, Michele, Logan, William, and Nic Craith, Máiréad, 189207. New York: Routledge, 2010.
Logan, William, Langfield, Michele, and Nic Craith, Máiréad. “Intersecting Concepts and Practices.” In Cultural Diversity, Heritage and Human Rights, edited by Langfield, Michele, Logan, William, and Nic Craith, Máiréad, 320. New York: Routledge, 2010.
Lowenthal, David. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Markoff, Irene. “Music, Saints, and Ritual: Samā and the Alevis of Turkey.” In Manifestations of Sainthood in Islam, edited by Martin Smith, Grace and Ernst, Carl W., 95110. Istanbul: Isis Press, 1993.
Mountcastle, Amy. “Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Inevitability of Loss: A Tibetan Example.” Studia ethnologica Croatica 22 (2010): 339–59.
Oran, Baskın. “The Minority Concept and Rights in Turkey: The Lausanne Peace Treaty and Current Issues.” In Human Rights in Turkey, edited by Kabasakal Arat, Z. F., 3556. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.
Öktem, Kerem. “Being Muslim at the Margins: Alevis and the AKP.” Middle East Report 246. http://www.merip.org/mer/mer246/being-muslim-margins (2008; accessed 23 December 2011).
Ruggles, Fairchild D., and Silverman, Helaine. “From Tangible to Intangible.” In Intangible Heritage Embodied, edited by Fairchild Ruggles, D. and Silverman, Helaine, 114. London: Springer, 2009.
Sahin, Sehriban. “The Rise of Alevism as a Public Religion.” Current Sociology 53 (2005): 465–85.
Shankland, David. The Alevis in Turkey: The Emergence of a Secular Islamic Tradition. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Shankland, David. “Modes of Religiosity and the Legacy of Ernest Gellner.” In Ritual and Memory: Toward a Comparative Anthropology of Religion, edited by Whitehouse, Harvey and Laidlaw, James, 3148. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press, 2004.
Shepherd, Robert. “UNESCO and the Politics of Cultural Heritage in Tibet.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 36, no. 2 (2006): 243–57.
Silverman, Helaine. “Contested Cultural Heritage: A Selective Historiography.” In Contested Cultural Heritage, edited by Silverman, Helaine, 150. New York: Springer, 2011.
Silverman, Helaine, and Fairchild Ruggles, D.. “Cultural Heritage and Human Rights.” In Cultural Heritage and Human Rights, edited by Silverman, Helaine and Fairchild Ruggles, D., 322. New York: Springer, 2007.
Smith, Laurajane. “Deference and Humility: The Social Values of the Country House.” In Valuing Historic Environments, edited by Gibson, Lisanne and Pendlebury, John, 3350. Burlington: Ashgate, 2009.
Smith, Laurajane. “Empty Gestures? Heritage and the Politics of Recognition.” In Cultural Heritage and Human Rights, edited by Silverman, Helaine and Fairchild Ruggles, D., 159–71. New York: Springer, 2007.
Smith, Laurajane. Uses of Heritage. New York: Routledge, 2006.
Tambar, Kabir. “The Aesthetics of Public Visibility: Alevi Semah and the Paradoxes of Pluralism in Turkey.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 52, no. 3 (2010): 652–79.
Tunbridge, J. E., and Ashworth, G. J.. Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. New York: Wiley, 1996.
UNESCO. Basic Texts: Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, 2008.
UNESCO. “Semah Nomination Form,”115. http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/RL/00384 (2010; accessed 17 December 2012).
USCIRF Annual Report. “The Commission’s Watch List: Turkey.”http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?page=search&docid=4a4f27293c&skip=0&query=watch%20list&coi=TUR (2009; accessed 20 December 2011).
Van Bruinessen, Martin. “‘Aslını inkar eden haramzadedir!’ The Debate on the Ethnic Identity of the Kurdish Alevis.” Working Paper, Center for the Study of Asia & the Middle East, Deakin University, Malvern, Victoria (Australia): 126. http://www.let.uu.nl/~martin.vanbruinessen/personal/publications/Alevikurds.htm (1997; accessed 23 December 2012).
Van Bruinessen, Martin.“Kurds, Turks and the Alevi Revival in Turkey.” Middle East Report 200 (1996): 710.
Warhola, James W., and Bezci, Egemen B.. “Religion and State in Contemporary Turkey: Recent Developments in Laiklik.” Journal of Church and State 52, no. 3 (2010): 427–53.
Yildirim, Mine. “The Right to Have Places of Worship—A Trapped Right.” International Institute for Religious Freedom. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4d6e4b0f2.html (28 March 2011; accessed 23 December 2011).
Zeidan, David. “The Alevi of Anatolia.” Middle East Review of International Affairs 3, no. 4. http://www.gloria-center.org/1999/12/zeidan-1999-12-05/ (1999; accessed 4 January 2013).
Zürcher, Erik J., and Van der Linden, H.. “Searching for the Fault-Line.” In The European Union, Turkey and Islam, 83174. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University, 2004.

How Participatory is Participatory Heritage Management? The Politics of Safeguarding the Alevi Semah Ritual as Intangible Heritage

  • Bahar Aykan (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed