Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Expanding Access to Scientific Data: Juxtaposing Intellectual Property Agendas via a “Some Rights Reserved” Model

  • Eric C. Kansa (a1), Jason Schultz (a2) and Ahrash N. Bissell (a3)
Abstract

The twenty-first century has ushered in new debates and social movements that aim to structure how culture is produced, owned, and distributed. At one side, open-knowledge advocates seek greater freedom for finding, distributing, using, and reusing information. On the other hand, traditional-knowledge rights advocates seek to protect certain forms of knowledge from appropriation and exploitation and seek recognition for communal and culturally situated notions of heritage and intellectual property. Understanding and bridging the tension between these movements represents a vital and significant challenge. This paper explores possible areas of where these seemingly divergent goals may converge, centered on the Creative Commons concept of some rights reserved. We argue that this concept can be extended into areas where scientific disciplines intersect with traditional knowledge. This model can help build a voluntary framework for negotiating more equitable and open communication between field researchers and diverse stakeholding communities.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alexander, Isabella. “White Law, Black Art.” International Journal of Cultural Property 10, no. 2 (2001): 185216.

Brown, Glenn Otis. “Out of the Way: How the Next Copyright Revolution Can Help the Next Scientific Revolution.” PLoS Biology1, no. 1 (2003).

Brown, Glenn Otis. “Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web.” Anthropological Quarterly77, no. 3 (2004): 57580.

Brown, Michael. “Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12, no. 1 (2005): 4061.

Calhoun, J. B.The Role of Temperature and Natural Selection in the Variations in Size of the English Sparrow in the United States.” American Naturalist81 (1947): 20328.

Campbell, Eric G., Brian R.Clarridge, ManjushaGokhale, LaurenBirenbaum, StephenHilgartner, Neil A.Holtzman, and DavidBlumenthal. “Data Withholding in Academic Genetics.” Journal of the American Medical Association287, no. 4 (2002): 47380.

Chander, Anupam, and MadhaviSunder. “The Romance of the Public Domain.” California Law Review92 (2004): 133173.

Coombe, Rosemary J., and AndrewHerman. “Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web.” Anthropological Quarterly77, no. 3 (2004): 55974.

Cox, Paul Alan. “Will Tribal Knowledge Survive the Millennium?Science287, no. 5459 (2000): 4455.

Crespi, B. J., and F. L.Bookstein. “A Path-Analytic Model for the Measurement of Selection on Morphology.” Evolution43, no. 1 (1989): 1828.

Eisen, M. B., P. O.Brown, and H. E.Varmus. “PLoS Medicine—a Medical Journal for the Internet Age.” PLoS Medicine1, no. 1 (2004): 31.

Grant, P. R.Centripetal Selection and the House Sparrow.” Systematic Zoology21 (1972): 2330.

Harris, J. A.A Neglected Paper on Natural Selection in the English Sparrow.” American Naturalist45 (1911): 3148.

Johnston, R. F., D. M.Niles, and S. A.Rohwer. “Hermon Bumpus and Natural Selection in the House Sparrow Passer Domesticus.” Evolution26, no. 1 (1972): 2031.

Kelty, Christopher. “Punt to Culture.” Anthropological Quarterly77, no. 3 (2004): 54758.

Manly, B. F. J..Some Examples of Double Exponential Fitness Functions.” Heredity36, no. 2 (1976): 22934.

Miller, James R., and Richard J.Hobbs. “Conservation Where People Live and Work.” Conservation Biology16, no. 2 (2002): 33037.

Moller, H. F. Berkes, P. O.Lyver, and M.Kislalioglu. “Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management.” Ecology and Society9, no. 3 (2004). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2/.

Moran, Katy, Steven R.King, and Thomas J.Carlson. “Biodiversity Prospecting: Lessons and Prospects.” Annual Review of Anthropology30, no. 1 (2001): 50526.

Nicholas, George P., and Kelly P.Bannister. “Copyrighting the Past? Emerging Intellectual Property Rights Issues in Archaeology.” Current Anthropology45, no. 3 (2004): 32750.

O'Donald, P.A Further Analysis of Bumpus' Data: The Intensity of Natural Selection.” Evolution27, no. 3 (1973): 398404.

Reich, Vicky, and David S. H.Rosenthal. “LOCKSS: A Permanent Web Publishing and Access System.” D-Lib Magazine7, no. 6 (2001).

Richards, Julian. “Preservation and Re-Use of Digital Data: The Role of the Archaeology Data Service.” Antiquity71, no. 274 (1997): 10579.

Samuelson, Pamela. “Preserving the Positive Functions of the Public Domain in Science.” Data Science Journal2, no. 24 (2004): 1927.

Schluter, D.Estimating the Form of Natural Selection on a Quantitative Character.” Evolution42 (1988): 84961.

Vaidhyanathan, Siva. “The State of Copyright Activism.” First Monday: Peer-review journal on the Internet9, no. 4 (2004). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_4/siva/index.html.

Willinsky, John. “Copyright Contradictions in Scholarly Publishing.” First Monday: Peer-review journal on the Internet7, no. 11 (2002).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Cultural Property
  • ISSN: 0940-7391
  • EISSN: 1465-7317
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-cultural-property
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 22 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 212 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.