Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

A post-colonial legal approach to the Chagos case and the (dis)application of land rights norms

  • Kinnari Bhatt (a1)
Abstract

One way of understanding the exile of the Chagos Islanders and their inability to return to their ancestral land is through a reading of the case from a perspective of post-colonial legal scholarship. Chagossians have strong legal rights to land and remedies of compensation and return through a purposive application of the international legal definition of Indigenous, Magna Carta right to abode and international human rights law that could address their dispossession. Yet, the inability of those rights to be meaningfully applied has been constrained because of the post-colonial way they are legally interpreted, creating a legal vacuum in which basic fairness and substantive equality have been routinely compromised. Drawing attention to the continued legal denial of return in the context of decolonisation, ongoing colonialism and the rule of law makes sense of the legal record and explains the expulsion of the islanders despite the moral merits of return.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A post-colonial legal approach to the Chagos case and the (dis)application of land rights norms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A post-colonial legal approach to the Chagos case and the (dis)application of land rights norms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A post-colonial legal approach to the Chagos case and the (dis)application of land rights norms
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail: kinnari@bhattsolicitor.info
References
Hide All
Allen, S (2007) Looking beyond the Bancoult cases: international law and the prospect of resettling the Chagos Islands. Human Rights Law Review 7, 441482.
Allen, S (2014) Chagos Islanders and International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Anghie, A (2007) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bingham, TH (2010) The Rule of Law. London: Penguin.
Boycott, O (2017) EU members abstain as Britain defeated in UN vote on Chagos Islands, The Guardian, 23 June 2017. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/22/un-vote-backing-chagos-islands-a-blow-for-uk (accessed 12 March 2018).
Cernea, M (2003) For a new economics of resettlement: a sociological critique of the compensation principle. International Social Science Journal 175, 3745.
Coulthard, GS (2014) Red Skin, White Masks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dworkin, R (1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fanon, F (1967) The Wretched of the Earth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Flanagan, T (1989) The agricultural argument and original appropriation: Indian lands and political philosophy. Canadian Journal of Political Science 22: 589602.
Frostad, M (2013) The ‘colonial clause’ and extraterritorial application of human rights: the European Convention on Human Rights Article 56 and its relationship to Article 1. Arctic Review on Law and Politics 4, 2141.
Gilbert, J (2007) Nomadic territories: a human rights approach to nomadic peoples’ land rights. Human Rights Law Review 7, 681716.
Huh, S (2015) Title to territory in the post-colonial era: original title and terra nullius in the ICJ judgments on cases concerning Ligitan/Sipadan (2002) and Pedra Branca (2008). European Journal of International Law 26, 709725.
Hulme, D and Murphree, M (1999) Policy arena: communities, wildlife and the ‘new conservation’ in Africa. Journal of International Development 2, 277285.
Jeffery, L (2011) Chagos Islanders in Mauritius and the UK Forced Displacement and Onward Migration. New Ethnographies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jones, S and Motha, S (2015) A new nomos offshore and bodies as their own signs. Law & Literature 27, 253278.
Kingsbury, B (1998) Indigenous peoples’ in international law: a constructivist approach to the Asian controversy. American Journal of International Law 92, 414457.
Kymlicka, W (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Laslett, P (1960) Locke's Two Treatises of Government, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez Cobo, J (1986/7) Study of the problem of discrimination against Indigenous populations’, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/MCS_xvii_en.pdf (accessed 26 June 2017).
Mutua, M and Anghie, A (2000) What is TWAIL? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 94: 3140.
O'Connell, P (2011) The death of socio-economic rights. Modern Law Review 74, 532554.
Poole, T (2010) United Kingdom: the royal prerogative. International Journal of Constitutional Law 8, 146155.
Povinelli, E (2011) The governance of the prior. Interventions 13, 1330.
Prasad, P (2009) Colonialism, Race, and the French Romantic Imagination. London: Routledge.
Sassen, S (2014) Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Waldron, J (2003) Indigeneity? First peoples and last occupancy. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 1, 5582.
Wiessner, S (2011) The cultural rights of Indigenous peoples: achievements and continuing challenges. European Journal of International Law 22, 121140.
Wolfe, P (2006) Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research 8, 387409.
Young, T (2006) Declining rural populations and the future of biodiversity: missing the forest for the trees? Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 9, 319334.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed