Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:35:27.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CPW-fed SGF-TSRR antenna for multiband applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

C. Elavarasi*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry 605 014, India. Phone: +91-9790412826
T. Shanmuganantham
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry 605 014, India. Phone: +91-9790412826
*
Corresponding author: C. Elavarasi Email: celavarasi19@gmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, a solid co-planar waveguide-fed fractal metamaterial antenna is offered. The proposed design consists of Sierpinski gasket iterations and a complementary triangular split ring resonator (CTSRR) loaded underneath the substrate, which is accountable for pull off multiband uniqueness and resolve good impedance identical. In sketch to hassle multiresonant frequency band facet, these CTSRR are entrenched reverse side of the substrate. The anticipated antenna with a dense dimension of 12 × 14 × 1.6 mm3 is fabricated and tested. The testing result designates that the projected design has −10 dB of 5.72, 14.3, and 16.06 GHz, respectively, and covers 5.72 GHz wireless local area network, 14.3 GHz fixed satellite, and 16.06 GHz International Telecommunication Union (ITU) band. It has fine emission uniqueness for jointly E-plane and H-plane in all the preferred occurrence bands and produce superior performance compared with the offered antenna intend in the prose. The loaded CTSRR construction recital is validated all the way during negative permeability pulling out and assorted parametric study.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Kumar, Y.; Singh, S.: Microstrip fed multiband hybrid fractal antenna for wireless applications. ACES J., 31 (3) (2016), 327332.Google Scholar
[2] Cai, Y.; Qian, Z.; Ciao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.: Electrically large resonant cavity loaded with ε-ve and μ-ve metamaterials. IEEE Antenna Wireless Propag. Lett., 15 (2016), 294297.Google Scholar
[3] Elavarasi, C.; Shanmuganantham, T.: Parametric analysis of water lily shaped SRR loaded fractal monopole antenna for multiband applications. WASET, Int. J. Electr. Comput. Energ. Electron. Commun. Eng., 5 (9) (2016), 12421245.Google Scholar
[4] Si, L.-M.; Zhu, W.; Sun, H.: A compact, planar, and CPW fed meta-material inspired dual band antenna. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 12 (2013), 305308.Google Scholar
[5] Naser-Moghadasi, M.; Ali Sadeghzadeh, R.; Khajeh Mohammad Lou, R.; Singh Virdee, B.; Aribi, T.: Semi fractal three leaf clover shaped CPW antenna for triple band applications. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng., 10 (5) (2015), 413418.Google Scholar
[6] Thankachan, S.; Chandran, A.A.: SRR loaded UWB monopole antenna with WiMAX and WLAN notch. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. Res., 5 (7) (2016), 23972400.Google Scholar
[7] Mishra, R.; Pandey, A.: Asymmetric crescent shaped dual band monopole antenna for UWB and GSM 1800/1900 applications. Int. J. Microw. Opt. Technol., 11 (5) (2016), 356361.Google Scholar
[8] Zarghooni, B.; Dadgarpour, A.; Denidni, T.A.: Effect of stepped-impedance resonators on rectangular metamaterial unit cells. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng., 25 (7) (2016), 582590.Google Scholar
[9] Seladji-Hassaine, N.; Bendimerad, F.T.: Miniaturized dual band triangular microstrip antenna with Sierpinski Fractal Ground. Int. J. Microw. Opt. Technol., 11 (5) (2016), 347355.Google Scholar
[10] Dawar, P.; Raghava, N.S.; De, A.: Ultra wide band, multi-resonance antenna using Swastika metamaterial. Int. J. Microw. Opt. Technol., 11 (6) (2016), 413420.Google Scholar