Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-x5mqb Total loading time: 0.208 Render date: 2021-11-28T21:57:14.589Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2019

Get access


This paper highlights how international organizations can use global performance indicators (GPIs) to drive policy change through transnational market pressure. When international organizations are credible assessors of state policy, and when monitored countries compete for market resources, GPIs transmit information about country risk and stabilize market expectations. Under these conditions banks and investors may restrict access to capital in noncompliant states and incentivize increased compliance. I demonstrate this market-enforcement mechanism by analyzing the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental body that issues nonbinding recommendations to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The FATF's public listing of noncompliant jurisdictions has prompted international banks to move resources away from listed states and raised the costs of continued noncompliance, significantly increasing the number of states with laws criminalizing terrorist financing. This finding suggests a powerful pathway through which institutions influence domestic policy and highlights the power of GPIs in an age where information is a global currency.

Copyright © The IO Foundation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abdelal, Rawi, and Blyth, Mark. 2015. Just Who Put You in Charge? We Did: CRAs and the Politics of Ratings. In Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, edited by Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack, 39-59. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Franklin, Beck, Thorsten, Carletti, Elena, Lane, Philip R., Schoenmaker, Dirk, and Wagner, Wolf. 2011. Cross-Border Banking in Europe: Implications for Financial Stability and Macroeconomic Policies. Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Amato, Jeffery D., Morris, Stephen, and Shin, Hyun Song. 2002. Communication and Monetary Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18 (4):495503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldacci, Emanuele, Gupta, Sanjeev, and Mati, Amine. 2011. Political and Fiscal Risk Determinants of Sovereign Spreads in Emerging Markets. Review of Development Economics 15 (2):251–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank for International Settlements. 2016. Correspondent Banking. Technical Report.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisbee, James H., Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2019. The Millennium Development Goals and Education: Accountability and Substitution in Global Assessment. International Organization 73 (3). <>.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Zorn, Christopher J. W.. 2001. Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4):972–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1):6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Sarah M., Cunha, Raphael, and Mosley, Layna. 2014. Categories, Creditworthiness, and Contagion: How Investors’ Shortcuts Affect Sovereign Debt Markets. International Studies Quarterly 59 (3):587601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Valentina, and Shin, Hyun Song. 2015a. Capital Flows and the Risk-Taking Channel of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 71:119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Valentina, and Shin, Hyun Song. 2015b. Cross-Border Banking and Global Liquidity. The Review of Economic Studies 82 (2):535–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim, and Milner, Helen V.. 2008. The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements? American Journal of Political Science 52 (4):741–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce G. 2013. From Uncertainty Toward Risk: The Case of Credit Ratings. Socio-Economic Review 11 (3):525–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, Matthew, Cook, Samantha, and Soramaki, Kimmo. 2016. The Impact of Anti-Money Laundering Regulation on Payment Flows: Evidence from SWIFT Data. Center for Global Development, Technical Report 445.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doshi, Rush, Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2019. The Power of Ranking: The Ease of Doing Business Report as a Form of Social Pressure. International Organization 73 (3). <>.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Guzman, Andrew T., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2006. Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization 60 (4):811–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2006. Third Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. Technical Report.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2008a. Terrorist Financing. Technical Report.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2008b. Third Mutual Evaluation on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. Technical Report.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2008c. Third Mutual Evaluation Report: Japan. Technical Report.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2009a. FATF Annual Report: 2008–2009. Technical Report.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2009b. ICRG Co-Chairs’ Report. Technical Report.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2009c. Methodology for Assessing Compliance with the FATF 40 Recommendations and the FATF 9 Special Recommendations. FATF/OECD.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2010. Mutual Evaluation Report: Germany. Technical Report.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2015. Results of the Terrorist Financing Fact-Finding Initiative — FATF Members. Technical Report. FATF/PLEN 30.Google Scholar
FATF-GAFI. 2017. Mutual Evaluation Report: Thailand. Technical Report.Google Scholar
Findley, Michael G., Nielson, Daniel L., and Sharman, J.C.. 2014. Causes of Noncompliance with International Law: A Field Experiment on Anonymous Incorporation. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):146–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. 2009. International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Congressional Quarterly Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D.. 2006. Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization 60 (4):911–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2013. Modified Polity P4 and P4D Data, Version 4.0. Available at <>..>Google Scholar
Gray, Julia. 2013. The Company States Keep: International Economic Organizations and Investor Perceptions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2005. Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendants in World Trade Organization Disputes. The Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2):557–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Xu, Yiqing. 2019. How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice. Political Analysis 27 (2):163–92.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J.. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication. The Yale Law Journal 107 (2):273391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Sabine, and Mihaljek, Dubravko. 2010. The Determinants of Cross-Border Bank Flows to Emerging Markets: New Empirical Evidence on the Spread of Financial Crises. BIS Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilscher, Jens, and Nosbusch, Yves. 2010. Determinants of Sovereign Risk: Macroeconomic Fundamentals and the Pricing of Sovereign Debt. Review of Finance 14 (2):235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2007. Matching as Non-parametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15 (3):199236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, Dan, and Weaver, Catherine. 2019. A Race to the Top? The Aid Transparency Index and the Normative Power of Global Performance Assessments. International Organization 73 (3). <>.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Nordström, Håkan. 1999. Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased? CEPR Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2007. Thailand: Detailed Assessment Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. Technical Report.Google Scholar
Jakobi, Anja P. 2013. Common Goods and Evils? The Formation of Global Crime Governance. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobi, Anja P. 2018. Governing Illicit Finance in Transnational Security Spaces: The FATF and Anti-Money Laundering. Crime, Law and Social Change 69 (2):173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Leslie. 2012. Courts as Coordinators: Endogenous Enforcement and Jurisdiction in International Adjudication. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (2):257–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2019. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. International Organization 73 (3). <>.Google Scholar
Longstaff, Francis A., Pan, Jun, Pedersen, Lasse Heje, and Singleton, Kenneth J.. 2011. How Sovereign Is Sovereign Credit Risk? American Economic Journal Macroeconomics 3 (2):75103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Milner, Helen V.. 2012. Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of International Trade Agreements. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3):477513.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Simon, Herbert W.. 1958. Organizations. Wiley.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2011. Measuring the World. Current Anthropology 52 (S3):S83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):513–53.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Junji. 2011. International Harmonization of Economic Regulation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozturk, Huseyin. 2016. Reliance of Sovereign Credit Ratings on Governance Indicators. The European Journal of Development Research 28 (2):184212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, Bradley C., and Masaki, Takaaki. 2017. When Do Performance Assessments Influence Policy Behavior? Micro-Evidence from the 2014 Reform Efforts Survey. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Posner, Elliot. 2009. Making Rules for Global Finance: Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation at the Turn of the Millennium. International Organization 63 (4):665–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. 1998. Conclusions. In The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments, edited by Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal, and Skolnikoff, Eugene B., 659707. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rickard, Stephanie J. 2010. Democratic Differences: Electoral Institutions and Compliance with GATT/WTO Agreements. European Journal of International Relations 16 (4):711–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Armin. 2006. A New Form of Governance? Comparing the Open Method of Coordination to Multilateral Surveillance by the IMF and the OECD. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1):7088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, J.C. 2008. Power and Discourse in Policy Diffusion: Anti-Money Laundering in Developing States. International Studies Quarterly 52 (3):635–56.Google Scholar
Shiller, Robert J. 2015. Irrational Exuberance. 3rd. ed. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2000. The Legalization of International Monetary Affairs. International Organization 54 (3):573602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2001. The International Politics of Harmonization: The Case of Capital Market Regulation. International Organization 55 (3):589620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1):171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takáts, Elod, and Avdjiev, Stefan. 2014. Cross-Border Bank Lending During the Taper Tantrum: The Role of Emerging Market Fundamentals. BIS Quarterly Review (14 September): 4960.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007. Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, B. Brigitte, and Busuioc, Madalina. 2007. The Scale and Impacts of Money Laundering. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of State. 2010. International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, Volume 2: Money Laundering and Financial Crimes. US Department of State, March.Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2012. International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Technical Report.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Morse supplementary material

Morse supplementary material 1

Download Morse supplementary material(File)
File 419 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Morse supplementary material

Morse supplementary material 2

Download Morse supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 419 KB
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *