Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-qcsxw Total loading time: 1.047 Render date: 2022-08-10T23:45:34.904Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2016

Get access

Abstract

Scholars, observing clustering in transitions to democracy, argue that democratization diffuses across borders as citizens in autocracies demand the same reforms they witness in neighboring states. We disagree. This article demonstrates that diffusion plays only a highly conditional role in democratization. We advance and test an alternative two-step theory of clustered democratization: (1) economic and international political shocks, which are clustered spatially and temporally, induce the breakdown of authoritarian regimes; then (2) democratic diffusion, in turn, influences whether a fallen dictatorship will be replaced by a democracy or a new autocracy. Diffusion, despite playing an important role, is insufficient to explain the clustering of transitions. Using data on 125 autocracies from 1875 to 2004, we show that economic crises trigger authoritarian breakdowns, while diffusion influences whether the new regime is democratic or authoritarian.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A., and Yared, Pierre. 2008. Income and Democracy. American Economic Review 98 (3):808–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahlquist, John S., and Wibbels, Erik. 2012. Riding the Wave: World Trade and Factor-Based Models of Democratization. American Journal of Political Science 56 (2):447–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ai, Chunrong, and Norton, Edward C.. 2003. Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economics Letters 80 (1):123–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick. 2009. Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation. Journal of Politics 71 (3):1125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2011. Democracy, Development, and the International System. American Political Science Review 105 (4):809–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, Miller, Michael, and Rosato, Sebastian. 2013. A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46 (12):1523–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan Carol. 2003. Endogenous Democratization. World Politics 55 (4):517–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and van de Walle, Nicolas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Dietmar, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2006. Taking “Galton's Problem” Seriously: Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18 (3):298322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinks, Daniel, and Coppedge, Michael. 2006. Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies 39:463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Sarah M. 2005. Interdependent and Domestic Foundations of Policy Change: The Diffusion of Pension Privatization Around the World. International Studies Quarterly 49 (2):273–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brückner, Markus, and Ciccone, Antonio. 2011. Rain and the Democratic Window of Opportunity. Econometrica 79 (3):923–47.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Csordás, Stefan, and Ludwig, Markus. 2011. An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of Democracy: Trade, Aid and the Neighbor Effect. Economics Letter 110:235–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 2000. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2012. Interactive Diffusion: The Coevolution of Police and Protest Behavior with an Application to Transnational Contention. Comparative Political Studies 45 (1):119–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorenspleet, Renske. 2004. The Recent Context of Recent Transitions to Democracy. European Journal of Political Research 43:309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. Model Specification in Instrumental-Variables Regression. Political Analysis 16:290302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, and Simmons, Beth. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98:171–90.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, and Simmons, Beth. 2005. On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1):3351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 2006. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes? American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):650–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D.. 2006. Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization 60 (4):911–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Hein, Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009. Introducing Archigos: A Data Set of Political Leaders. Journal of Peace Research 46 (2):169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunitsky, Seva. 2014. From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century. International Organization 68 (3): 561–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Stephen, and Menaldo, Victor. 2011. Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse. American Political Science Review 105 (1):126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry. 2013. Regime Change Cascades: What We Have Learned from the 1848 Revolutions to the 2011 Arab Uprisings. Annual Review of Political Science 16:331–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, Cullen, Haggard, Stephan, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2009. Grievance and Opportunity: Food Prices, Political Regime, and Protest. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Studies Association, February, New York.Google Scholar
Hennessy, Alexandra, and Steinwand, Martin. 2014. The Sources of Pension Reforms in Western Europe: Domestic Factors, Policy Diffusion, or Common Shock? International Interactions 40 (4):477505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, Christian. 2009. Inequality and Democracy: Why Inequality Harms Consolidation But Does Not Affect Democratization. World Politics 61:589622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Janos, Andrew C. 2000. East Central Europe in the Modern World: The Politics of the Borderlands from Pre- to Post-Communism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Richard. 1997. Democratization in Africa After 1989: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Comparative Politics 29 (3):363–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, Mark Andreas, and Peress, Michael. 2012. Benchmarking Across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison. American Political Science Review 106 (3):661–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Ryan. 2010. The Contradiction of Modernization: A Conditional Model of Endogenous Democratization. Journal of Politics 72 (3):785–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koesel, Karrie, and Bunce, Valerie. 2013. Diffusion-Proofing: Russian and Chinese Responses to Waves of Popular Mobilizations Against Authoritarian Rulers. Perspectives on Politics 11 (3):753–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koesel, Karrie, Bunce, Valerie, and Wolchik, Sharon. 2011. Stopping the Diffusion of Popular Protests Against Authoritarian Rule. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Seattle.Google Scholar
Laeven, Luc, and Valencia, Fabián. 2013. Systemic Banking Crises Database. IMF Economic Review 61 (2):225–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, Peter T., and Dean, Andrea M.. 2009. The Democratic Domino Theory: An Empirical Investigation. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3):533–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Quan, and Reuveny, Rafael. 2003. Economic Globalization and Democracy: An Empirical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 33 (1):2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred, eds. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (1):69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, Milner, Helen, and Rosendorff, Peter. 2000. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 94 (2):305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinov, Nikolay, and Goemans, Hein. 2013. Coups and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science 44 (4):799825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markoff, John, and Baretta, Silvio R. Duncan. 1990. Economic Crisis and Political Change in Brazil: The 1960s and the 1980s. Comparative Politics 22:421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuura, Kenji, and Willmott, Cort J.. 2007. Terrestrial Precipitation: 1900–2006 Gridded Monthly Time Series (version 1.01). Newark, DE: Center for Climatic Research, Department of Geography, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Miguel, Edward, Satyanath, Shanker, and Sergenti, Ernest. 2004. Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach. Journal of Political Economy 112 (41):725–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Michael. 2012. Economic Development, Violent Leader Removal, and Democratization. American Journal of Political Science 56 (4):1002–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Michael. 2014. Elections and Elite Violence on the Road to Democratization, 1800–2010. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Oatley, Thomas. 2006. International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy. Boston: Longman.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, John, Ward, Michael, Lofdahl, Corey, Cohen, Jordin, Brown, David, Reilly, David, Gleditsch, Kristian, and Shin, Michael. 1998. The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946–1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (4):545–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegram, Thomas. 2010. Diffusion Across Political Systems: The Global Spread of National Human Rights Institutions. Human Rights Quarterly 32 (3):729–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2005. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José A., and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rahman, Muhammad, Anbarci, Nejat, Bhattacharya, Prasad, and Ulubasoglu, Mehmet. 2013. The Shocking Origins of Political Transitions? Evidence from Earthquakes. Working paper. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Carmen M., and Rogoff, Kenneth S.. 2011. From Financial Crash to Debt Crisis. American Economic Review 101 (5):1676–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Gordon. 1986. Stabilization Crises and the Breakdown of Military Authoritarianism in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 18 (4):449–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2001. Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics 53 (3):325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehyan, Idean, and Gleditsch, Kristian. 2006. Refugees and the Spread of Civil War. International Organization 60 (2):335–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 1991. Democratic Dominoes: Diffusion Approaches to the Spread of Democracy in the International System. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):356–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Harvey, and Lindborg, Christina. 2003. Democratic Dominoes Revisited: The Hazards of Governmental Transitions, 1974–1996. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (4):490519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, Håvard, Hegre, Håvard, Gates, Scott, and Dahl, Marianne. 2013. Why Waves? Global Patterns of Democratization, 1820–2008. Working paper. Oslo, Norway: PRIO.Google Scholar
Tanneberg, Dag, Stefes, Christoph, and Merkel, Wolfgang. 2013. Hard Times and Regime Failure: Autocratic Responses to Economic Downturns. Contemporary Politics 19 (1):115–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan. 2010. Determinants of Democratization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Mark R. 2001. To Shoot or Not to Shoot: Posttotalitarianism in China and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics 34 (1):6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulfelder, Jay. 2009. Pathways to Political Liberalization in Dictatorships. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1532791. Accessed 7 September 2016.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, Wynand P.M.M. and Van Praag Bernard, M.S. 1981. The Demand for Deductibles in Private Health Insurance: A Probit Model with Sample Selection. Journal of Econometrics 17 (2):229–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wejnert, Barbara. 2005. Diffusion, Development, and Democracy, 1800–1999. American Sociological Review 70 (1):5381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wejnert, Barbara. 2014. Diffusion of Democracy: The Past and Future of Global Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2009. The Diffusion of Revolution: “1848” in Europe and Latin America. International Organization 63 (3):391423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Houle supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Houle supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 381 KB
21
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *