Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-r8t2r Total loading time: 0.166 Render date: 2022-07-03T16:23:20.024Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Judith Kelley
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, NC. E-mail: jkelley@duke.edu
Get access

Abstract

As international election monitors have grown active worldwide, their announcements have gained influence. Sometimes, however, they endorse highly flawed elections. Because their leverage rests largely on their credibility, this is puzzling. Understanding the behavior of election monitors is important because they help the international community to evaluate the legitimacy of governments and because their assessments inform the data used by scholars to study democracy. Furthermore, election monitors are also particularly instructive to study because the variety of both intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations that observe elections makes it possible to compare them across many countries and political contexts. This study uses a new dataset of 591 international election-monitoring missions. It shows that despite their official mandate to focus on election norms, monitors do not only consider the elections' quality; their assessments also reflect the interests of their member states or donors as well as other tangential organizational norms. Thus, even when accounting as best as possible for the nature and level of irregularities in an election, monitors' concerns about democracy promotion, violent instability, and organizational politics and preferences are associated with election endorsement. The study also reveals differences in the behavior of intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations and explains why neither can pursue their core objectives single-mindedly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbink, Jon. 2000. Introduction: Rethinking Democratization and Election Observation. In Election Observation and Democratization in Africa, edited by Abbink, Jon and Hesseling, Gerti, 117. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Dollar, David. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1):3363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, Douglas. 1992. International Monitoring as a Mechanism for Conflict Resolution in Southern Africa. Paper presented at the Centre for Foreign Relations' 7th International Conference on Peace and Security in Southern Africa, Arusha, Tanzania.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 2001. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjornlund, Eric C. 2004. Beyond Free and Fair: Monitoring Elections and Building Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2002. Merchants of Morality. Foreign Policy 129 (March/April):3645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. David, and Moore, Mark H.. 2001. Accountability, Strategy, and International Nongovernmental Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30 (3):569–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Stephen. 2001. Authoritarian Leaders and Multiparty Elections in Africa: How Foreign Donors Help to Keep Kenya's Daniel Arap Moi in Power. Third World Quarterly 22 (5):725–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1997. The Observers Observed. Journal of Democracy 8 (3):1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2006. The Backlash Against Democracy Promotion. Foreign Affairs 85 (2):5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2007. Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks. International Organization 61 (3):643–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter Center. 1997. The Observation of the 1997 Jamaican Elections. Atlanta, Ga.: Carter Center.Google Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie. 2001. Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Union. 2007. EU EOM Reporting Guidelines. Available from ⟨http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/human_rights/election_observation/docs/2007_eu_eom_reporting_guidelines_en.pdf⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Secretariat. 1993. Presidential, Parliamentary and Civic Elections in Kenya, 29 December 1992: The Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Secretariat. 2000. The Parliamentary Elections in Zimbabwe, 24–25 June 2000: The Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. 1990. Conference on the Human Dimension of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, Copenhagen: Document of the Second Meeting September 3. U.S. Department of State Dispatch.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Ron, James. 2002. The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action. International Security 27 (1):539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downie, Sue. 2000. Cambodia's 1998 Election: Understanding Why it Was Not a ‘Miracle on the Mekong’ Australian Journal of International Affairs 54 (1):4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elklit, Jørgen, and Reynolds, Andrew. 2002. The Impact of Election Administration on the Legitimacy of Emerging Democracies: A New Comparative Politics Research Agenda. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 40 (2):86119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elklit, Jørgen, and Reynolds, Andrew. 2005. A Framework for the Systematic Study of Election Quality. Democratization 12 (2):147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elklit, Jørgen, and Svensson, Palle. 1997. What Makes Elections Free and Fair? Journal of Democracy 8 (3):3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2007. Compendium of International Standards for Elections. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
European Union Observation Unit. 2000. Elections in Zimbabwe, 24–25 June 2000, Interim statement, Pierre Schori, Head of E.U. Election Observation Mission.Google Scholar
Fawn, Rick. 2006. Battle over the Box: International Election Observation Missions, Political Competition and Retrenchment in the Post-Soviet Space. International Affairs 82 (6):1133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foeken, Dick, and Dietz, Ton. 2000. Of Ethnicity, Manipulation and Observation: The 1992 and 1997 Elections in Kenya. In Election Observation and Democratization in Africa, edited by Abbink, Jon and Hesseling, Gerti, 122–49. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisler, Gisela. 1993. Fair? What Has Fairness Got to Do with It? Vagaries of Election Observations and Democratic Standards. Journal of Modern African Studies 31 (4):613–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeman, Henk E., Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009. Introducing Archigos: A Data Set of Political Leaders. Journal of Peace Research 46 (2):269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan Dayton. 2006. Observing Norms: Explaining the Causes and Consequences of Internationally Monitored Elections. Ph.D. diss., University of California San Diego.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan Dayton. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics 60 (1):3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Crisis Group. 1996. Elections in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Europe Report No. 16. 22 September 1996. Available at ⟨http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=1567&l=1⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009.Google Scholar
International Republican Institute. 1993. Follow up Statement IRI Observer Mission, Kenya General Election 29-12-1992. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
International Republican Institute. 1999. Kingdom of Cambodia Parliamentary Elections July 26, 1998: Observation Report. February 1999. Available at ⟨http://www.iri.org/asia/cambodia/pdfs/Cambodia's%201998%20Parliamentary%20Elections.pdf⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009.Google Scholar
Joint International Observer Group. 1998. Press Release. Phnom Penh, Cambodia.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2004. Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2008a. Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring. International Organization 62 (2):221–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2008b. The More the Merrier? The Effects of Having Multiple International Election Monitoring Organizations. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):5964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2008c. The Supply and Demand for International Election Monitoring. Working paper. Available at ⟨http://www.duke.edu/web/diem/docs/Supply%20and%20Demand.pdf⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009. Durham, N.C.: Project on International Election Monitoring, Duke University.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Krishna. 1998. Postconflict Elections, Democratization, and International Assistance. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Laakso, Liisa. 2002. The Politics of International Election Observation: The Case of Zimbabwe in 2000. Journal of Modern African Studies 40 (3):437–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwenhardt, John. 2005. A Clash of Observations. Helsinki Monitor 16 (1):13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 2006. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2004. Current version available at ⟨http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer. 1993. Mediating Democracy: A New Role for International Actors. In New World Order: Social and Economic Implications, edited by Bruce, David C., 129–40. Atlanta: Georgia State University Business Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer. 2004. What Really Happened in Venezuela? Economist 4 September, 38–40.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer, Garber, Larry, and Pastor, Robert. 1991. Making Peace by Observing and Mediating Elections. Journal of Democracy 2 (4):102–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James, Krueger, Eric L., and Poe, Steven C.. 1998. Testing Models of US Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid During and After the Cold War. Journal of Politics 60 (1):6385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Democratic Institute. 1999. The July 26, 1998 Cambodian National Assembly Elections. Washington, D.C. Available at ⟨http://www.ndi.org/node/13565⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009.Google Scholar
Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J.. 2003. Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. International Organization 57 (2):241–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). 2000. Final Report on the Parliamentary Elections in the Russian Federation, 19 December 1999. Available at ⟨http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2000/02/1454_en.pdf⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009. Warsaw, Poland: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.Google Scholar
Padilla, David, and Houppert, Elizabeth. 1993. International Election Observing: Enhancing the Principle of Free and Fair Elections. Emory International Law Review 7:73132.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2007. EU Condemns Pre-election Violence in Kenya. 21 December 2007. Available at ⟨http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL2120415120071221?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009.Google Scholar
Riley, Christopher A. 1997. Neither Free Nor Fair: The 1996 Bosnian Elections and the Failure of the U.N. Election-monitoring Mission. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 30 (5):1173–214.Google Scholar
Roth, Kenneth. 2008. Despots Masquerading as Democrats, World Report 2008. Available at ⟨http://www.hrw.org/legacy/wr2k8/introduction/introduction.pdf⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Santa-Cruz, Arturo. 2005. Constitutional Structures, Sovereignty, and the Emergence of Norms: The Case of International Election Monitoring. International Organization 59 (3):663–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13 (2):3650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Susan K., and Prakash, Aseem. 2004. Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest Between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1):143–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: The Limits and Asymmetries of Soft Power. In Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, edited by Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn, 301–18. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2002. Lending Credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the Post-Communist Transition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2004. The Political Economy of IMF Lending in Africa. American Political Science Review 98 (4):577–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2008. The Scope of IMF Conditionality. International Organization 62 (4):589620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 2005. Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation and Code of Conduct for International Election Observers. Available at ⟨http://www.idea.int/publications/other/upload/dec_obs_coc.pdf⟩. Accessed 2 July 2009.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. 2006. International Data Base (IDB). Total Midyear Population Data. Available at ⟨http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/index.php⟩. Accessed July 2006.Google Scholar
United States Department of State, Bureau of Democracy. 1978–2004. Human Rights, and Labor. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
van Kessel, Ineke. 2000. Stability or Democracy: On the Role of Monitors, Media and Miracles. In Election Observation and Democratization in Africa, edited by Abbink, Jon and Hesseling, Gerti, 5075. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank, 2006. World Development Indicators. Official development assistance and official aid in current US$. Available at ⟨http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0,,contentMDK:21725423~pagePK:64133150~piPK:64133175~theSitePK:239419,00.html⟩. Accessed July 2006.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2006. Time Series Data. Available at ⟨http://stat.wto.org/StatisticalProgram/WSDBStatProgramSeries.aspx?Language=E⟩. Accessed July 2006.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs 76 (6):2243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *