Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-vkn6t Total loading time: 0.367 Render date: 2022-08-20T00:17:33.738Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2021

Get access

Abstract

With the future of liberal internationalism in question, how will China's growing power and influence reshape world politics? We argue that views of the Liberal International Order (LIO) as integrative and resilient have been too optimistic for two reasons. First, China's ability to profit from within the system has shaken the domestic consensus in the United States on preserving the existing LIO. Second, features of Chinese Communist Party rule chafe against many of the fundamental principles of the LIO, but could coexist with a return to Westphalian principles and markets that are embedded in domestic systems of control. How, then, do authoritarian states like China pick and choose how to engage with key institutions and norms within the LIO? We propose a framework that highlights two domestic variables—centrality and heterogeneity—and their implications for China's international behavior. We illustrate the framework with examples from China's approach to climate change, trade and exchange rates, Internet governance, territorial sovereignty, arms control, and humanitarian intervention. Finally, we conclude by considering what alternative versions of international order might emerge as China's influence grows.

Type
External Challenges to the Liberal International Order
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2020. Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454>.Google Scholar
Allan, Bentley B., Vucetic, Srdjan, and Hopf, Ted. 2018. The Distribution of Identity and the Future of International Order: China's Hegemonic Prospects. International Organization 72 (4):839–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David H., Dorn, David, and Hanson, Gordon H.. 2013. The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review 103 (6):2121–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barma, Naazneen, Chiozza, Giacomo, Ratner, Ely, and Weber, Steven. 2009. A World Without the West? Empirical Patterns and Theoretical Implications. Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (4):525–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barma, Naazneen, Ratner, Ely, and Weber, Steven. 2013. The Mythical Liberal Order. The National Interest 124 (Mar/April):5668.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, and Zürn, Michael. 2021. Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence, Frieden, Jeffry, and Weymouth, Stephen. 2021. Populism in Place: The Economic Geography of the Globalization Backlash. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000314>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzas, Zoltan. 2021. Racism and Antiracism in the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2). < https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000521>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cames, Martin, Harthan, Ralph O., Füssler, Jürg, Lazarus, Michael, Lee, C., Erickson, Peter, and Spalding-Fecher, Randall. 2016. How Additional Is the Clean Development Mechanism? Analysis of Application of Current Tools and Proposed Alternatives. Oeko-Institut EV CLlMA. B 3. Available at <https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/ets/docs/clean_dev_mechanism_en.pdf.>Google Scholar
Campbell, Kurt M. and Ratner, Ely. 2018. The China Reckoning. Foreign Affairs 97 (March/April):6070.Google Scholar
Chaudoin, Stephen, Milner, Helen V., and Tingley, Dustin H.. 2010. The Center Still Holds: Liberal Internationalism Survives. International Security 35 (1):7594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development. 2012. CCICED 2011 Annual Report. China Environmental Science Press. Available at <http://www.cciced.net/ccicedPhoneEN/PolicyResearch/research/201609/P020160921527145484340.pdf>. Accessed 21 September 2020..+Accessed+21+September+2020.>Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J. 2015. The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Christoff, Peter. 2010. Cold Climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics 19 (4):637–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, Italo, and Stanig, Piero. 2018a. Global Competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review 112 (2):201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, Italo, and Stanig, Piero. 2018b The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science 62 (4):936–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., Green, Jessica F., and Hale, Thomas N.. 2020. Asset Revaluation and the Existential Politics of Climate Change. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000296>.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2017. The Liberal Order Is Rigged. Foreign Affairs 96 (May/June):3644.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel, and Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. Liberal World: The Resilient Order. Foreign Affairs 97 (July/August):1624.Google Scholar
De Vries, Catherine E., Hobolt, Sara B. and Walter, Stefanie. 2021. Politicizing International Cooperation: The Mass Public, Political Entrepreneurs, and Political Opportunity Structures. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000491>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkner, Robert. 2016. The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs 92 (5):1107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2021. The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order: When Global Institutions Are Self-Undermining. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000302>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Thomas M., and Rogowski, Ronald. 2021. Rising Inequality As a Threat to the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000163>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores-Macías, Gustavo A., and Kreps, Sarah E.. 2013. The Foreign Policy Consequences of Trade: China's Commercial Relations with Africa and Latin America, 1992–2006. The Journal of Politics 75 (2):357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary. 2020. China, the UN, and Human Protection: Beliefs, Power, Image. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, and Walter, Andrew. 2011. China, the United States, and Global Order. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, and Walter, Andrew. 2013. Global Norms and Major State Behavior: The Cases of China and the United States. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2):329–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fravel, M. Taylor. 2008. Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China's Territorial Disputes. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Courtney J. 2016. China and the Responsibility to Protect: From Opposition to Advocacy. United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace, 8 June. Available at <https://www.usip.org/publications/2016/06/china-and-responsibility-protect-opposition-advocacy>. Accessed 21 September 2020..+Accessed+21+September+2020.>Google Scholar
Fung, Courtney J. 2018. Separating Intervention from Regime Change: China's Diplomatic Innovations at the UN Security Council Regarding the Syria Crisis. The China Quarterly 235:693712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardone, Iginio. 2019. China, Africa, and the Future of the Internet. Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2018. Embedded Revisionism: Networks, Institutions, and Challenges to World Order. International Organization 72 (4):763–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace, and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. Forthcoming. The Exclusionary Foundations of Embedded Liberalism. International Organization 75 (2):<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000478>.Google Scholar
Hart, Melanie, and Magsamen, Kelly. 2019. Limit, Leverage, and Compete: A New Strategy on China. Center for American Progress, 3 April. Available at <https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2019/04/03/468136/limit-leverage-compete-new-strategy-china/>. Accessed 11 August 2020..+Accessed+11+August+2020.>Google Scholar
Huang, Yanxhong. 2004. The SARS Epidemic and Its Aftermath in China: A Political Perspective. In Learning from SARS: Preparing for the Next Disease Outbreak, edited by Mahmoud, Adel, Sivitz, Laura, Mack, Alison, Lemon, Stanley, Oberholtzer, Katherine, Knobler, Stacey. National Academies Press. Available at <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92479/> Accessed 21 September 2020.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D., and Saunders, Elizabeth N.. 2020. Recapturing Regime Type in International Relations: Leaders, Institutions, and Agency Space. International Organization 74 (2):363–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive Changing China? Foreign Affairs 87 (January/February)1:2337.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2020. The Next Liberal Order. Foreign Affairs 99 (July/August):133142.Google Scholar
Jensen, Eric Talbot. 2017. The Tallinn Manual 2.0: Highlights and Insights. Georgetown Journal of International Law 48:740–41.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2003. Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security 27 (4):556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair I. 2008. Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2019a. China and a World of Orders. International Security 44 (2):960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2019b. The Failures of the “Failure of Engagement” with China. The Washington Quarterly 42 (2):99114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, David C. 2003. Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks. International Security 27 (4):5785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Stephen B. 2016. Banking Unconditionally: The Political Economy of Chinese Finance in Latin America. Review of International Political Economy 23 (4):643–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastner, Scott L., Pearson, Margaret M., and Rector, Chad. 2018. China's Strategic Multilateralism: Investing in Global Governance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Chaim D., and Pape, Robert A.. 1999. Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain's Sixty-Year Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade. International Organization 53 (4):631–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostka, Genia, and Hobbs, William. 2012. Local Energy Efficiency Policy Implementation in China: Bridging the Gap Between National Priorities and Local Interests. The China Quarterly 211:765–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. 2012. No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. 2014. The Normative Foundations of Hegemony and The Coming Challenge to Pax Americana. Security Studies 23 (2):219–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A., and Trubowitz, Peter L.. 2007. Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States. International Security 32 (2):744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2018. Economic Openness and Great Power Competition: Lessons for China and the United States. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11 (3):237–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., Martin, Lisa L., and Risse, Thomas. 2021. Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000636>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Joanna I. 2008. China's Strategic Priorities in International Climate Change Negotiations. The Washington Quarterly 31 (1):155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Oksenberg, Michel. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorentzen, Peter, Landry, Pierre, and Yasuda, John. 2014. Undermining Authoritarian Innovation: The Power of China's Industrial Giants. The Journal of Politics 76 (1):182–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Rudra, Nita. 2021. Embedded Liberalism in the Digital Era. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000569>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamee, Lachlan, and Zhang, Anna. 2019. Demographic Engineering and International Conflict: Evidence from China and the Former USSR. International Organization 73 (2):291327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2019. Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order. International Security 43 (4):750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertha, Andrew, and Pahre, Robert. 2005. Patently Misleading: Partial Implementation and Bargaining Leverage in Sino-American Negotiations on Intellectual Property Rights. International Organization 59 (3):695729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2011. China's Turn Against Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (4):935–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, Nuno P. 2014. Theory of Unipolar Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Paul. 2019. International Hegemony Meets Domestic Politics: Why Liberals Can Be Pessimists. Security Studies 28 (3):451–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2018. Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (19):E4330–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Steven. 2014. The Politics of Poor Air Quality in Contemporary China. PhD diss., University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Pearson, Margaret M. 2001. The Case of China's Accession to GATT/WTO. In The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, edited by David, M. Lampton, 337–70. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Piccone, Ted. 2018. China's Long Game on Human Rights at the United Nations. Brookings.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1991. Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics 43 (4):479512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1994. Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War. International Organization 48 (2):185214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E. 2018. Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China's Great Firewall. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2):379415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., and Pu, Xiaoyu. 2011. After Unipolarity: China's Visions of International Order in an Era of US Decline. International Security 36 (1):4172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Adam. 2017. Chinese Cyber Diplomacy in a New Era of Uncertainty. Aegis Paper Series No. 1703. Stanford, California, Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Shi, Weiyi, and Zhu, Boliang. 2019. Managing International Tensions in Autocracies: Evidence from the Ongoing US-China Trade War. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Shirk, Susan. 2006. Trends in PRC-Taiwan Relations and United States Policy Responses. In Sources Of Conflict And Cooperation In The Taiwan Strait, edited by Yong-nian, Zheng, and Ray-kuo, Wu Raymond, 169–76. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Goemans, Hein. 2021. Built on Borders: Tensions with the Institution Liberalism (Thought It) Left Behind. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000600>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack, Shapiro, Robert Y., and Bloch-Elkon, Yaeli. 2009. Free Hand Abroad, Divide and Rule at Home. World Politics 61 (1):155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Christian P. 2017. Shaken Authority: China's Communist Party and the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, David A., and Shih, Victor C.. 2012. Interest Group Influence in Authoritarian States: The Political Determinants of Chinese Exchange Rate Policy. Comparative Political Studies 45 (11):1405–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, Rochelle. 2016. Backlash: Defiance, Human Rights, and the Politics of Shame. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Jeremy L. n.d. Seeking Truth, Hiding Facts: Information, Ideology, and Authoritarianism in China. Manuscript. Available at <http://www.jeremywallace.org/research.html>..>Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62 (1):3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2012. Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict. American Political Science Review 106 (2):326–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. P. 2014. Dictators at War and Peace. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2013. Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China. International Organization 67 (1):135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2019. A World Safe for Autocracy? Foreign Affairs 98 (July/August):92108.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen, and Wichowsky, Amber. 2018. External Influence on Exchange Rates: An Empirical Investigation of US Pressure and the Chinese RMB. Review of International Political Economy 25 (5):596623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Fuzuo. 2016. Shaping China's Climate Diplomacy: Wealth, Status, and Asymmetric Interdependence. Journal of Chinese Political Science 21 (2):199215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuthnow, Joel. 2013. Chinese Diplomacy and the UN Security Council: Beyond the Veto. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Bin. 2017. The Politics of Compassion: The Sichuan Earthquake and Civic Engagement in China. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Xuetong. 2018. Chinese Values vs. Liberalism: What Ideology Will Shape the International Normative Order? Chinese Journal of International Politics 11 (1):122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *