Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T06:24:07.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

General Assembly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

In accordance with a decision taken at the first part of its thirteenth session, the General Assembly reconvened on February 20, 1959, to consider exclusively the question of the future of the trust territories of the Cameroons under French administration and the Cameroons under United Kingdom administration. The Assembly referred the question to its Trusteeship (fourth) Committee which discussed the matter from its 844th meeting on February 25 to its 880th meeting on March 18. The Trusteeship Council had submitted a special report to the General Assembly concerning the future of these trust territories. The Council had also transmitted to the Assembly the reports of the UN visiting mission to trust territories in West Africa, 1958, and the observations of the administering authorities on the reports.

Information

Type
International Organizations: Summary of Activities I. United Nations
Information
International Organization , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Spring 1959 , pp. 274 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 For discussion on the Cameroons during the first part of the session, see International Organization, Winter 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 1), p. 116–118.Google Scholar

2 Document A/4094. For a summary of the proceedings in the Trusteeship Council which resulted in this report, see this issue, p. 302–305.Google Scholar

3 Document s A/42 and A/4093 and Rev.I.

4 Document A/4094, Annexes III and IV.

5 Document A/C.4/394 and Adds.1 to 5.

6 For discussion on these elections, which had taken place in December 1956, see International Organization, Summer 1957 (Vol. 11, No. 3), p. 516–520.Google Scholar

7 Document A/C.4/L.580.

8 For information on this area, see this issue, p. 303.Google Scholar

9 Document A/C.4/L.581.

10 Document A/C.4/L.583.

11 Document A/C.4/L.584.

12 Document A/C.4/L.580/Rev.1.

13 Document A/C.4/L.584/Rev.1.

14 Documents A/C.4/L.582 and A/C.4/L.585.

15 Document A/C.4/L.588.

16 Document A/C.4/L.582/Rev.1.

17 Document A/C.4/L.587/Rev.1.

18 Document A/C.4/L.589.

19 Document A/4095.

1 The International Atomic Energy Agency, an autonomous international organization under the aegis of the UN, is summarized for the sake of convenience under the General Assembly since, according to the relationship agreement between the agency and the UN, it is to report regularly to the Assembly (see Document A/3620 and Corr.1 for the draft agreement). For additional information on the agency, see Bechhoefer, Bernhard G., “Negotiating the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency,” International Organization, Winter 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 1), p. 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Document A/3747.

3 For a summary of the conference, see International Organization, Winter 1957 (Vol. 11, No. 1), p. 99–102.Google Scholar

4 For the decisions taken at these sessions, see International Atomic Energy Agency, Document GC (1)/ Resolutions.

5 International Atomic Energy Agency, Report of the International Atomic Energy Agency to the General Assembly of the United Nations Covering the Period from November 1, 1957, to June 30, 1958, Vienna, October 1958.Google Scholar See also the covering note by the Secretary-General, Document A/3950. For approval of the report by the General Assembly, see International Organization, Winter 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 1), p. 133Google Scholar. The report was also issued as an International Atomic Energy Agency document, GC(II)/40. A slightly enlarged but similar report was issued under the title: International Atomic Energy Agency, First Annual Report of the Board of Governors to the General Conference Covering the Period from October 23, 1957, to June 30, 1958, Vienna, July 1958.Google Scholar

6 For General Assembly approval of the agreement, see International Organization, Winter 1958 (Vol. 12, No. 1), p. 117.Google Scholar

7 International Atomic Energy Agency, General Conference, Second Regular Session,September 22—October 4, 1958, Resolutions and Other Decisions, Vienna, January 1959 (Document GC(II)/Resolutions).Google Scholar

8 UN Press Release IAEA/130, December 24, 1958.Google Scholar

9 This work followed a recommendation of the UN Conference on the Law of the Sea (see this issue, p. 284), and wishes expressed during the Second UN International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, in which the agency participated (see this issue, p. 285). This UN Conference should not be confused with the plenary body (General Conference) of the International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar

1 General Assembly Resolution 1105 (XI), February 21, 1957Google Scholar. For a summary of the discussion resulting in this resolution, see International Organization, Spring 1957 (Vol. 11, No. 2), p. 362–363.Google Scholar

2 The following summary is based on UN Press Releases Nos. L/303 (no date) and L/729, November 4, 1958.Google Scholar

3 Document A/CONF.13/L.56.

4 For information on action taken by the General Assembly, see International Organization, Winter 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 1), p. 131–133.Google Scholar

5 Document A/CONF.13/L.52.

6 Signatures on all instruments adopted by the Law of the Sea Conference must be followed by ratification; 22 ratifications or accessions were required for any of the conventions to enter into force. As of November 4, 1958, no nation had yet deposited such an instrument.Google Scholar

7 Document A/CONF.13/L.53 and Corr.1.

8 Document A/CONF.13/L.54 and Add.1.

9 Document A/CONF.13/L.55.

10 Document A/CONF.13/L.57.

11 Document A/CONF.13/L.56.

12 For discussion in the General Assembly on nuclear tests, see International Organization, Winter 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 1), p. 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 For action taken by IAEA in this connection, see this issue, p. 282.Google Scholar

14 For action taken by the General Assembly on this matter, see International Organization, Winter 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 1), p. 133.Google Scholar

15 Document A/CONF.13/L.58.

1 UN Press Releases AC/364-A, September 16, 1958Google Scholar, and AC/365, November 10, 1958Google Scholar. For a discussion of the first conference, see International Organization, February 1956 (Vol. 10, No. 1), p. 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1 Documents A/CONF.16/SR.1 and 2. For a summary of the eighth Technical Assistance Conference, see International Organization, Spring 1958 (Vol. 12, No. 2), p. 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 For information on the Special Fund, see International Organization, Winter 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 1), p. 89–90.Google Scholar

3 Document A/CONF.16/L.1.

4 Document A/CONF.16/1.

1 Was to contribute same proportion to the Special Fund as to the Expanded Program.

2 A maximum of $1,274,070 equivalent was pledged to the Expanded Program and the Special Fund on the assumption that a total of $100 million would be reached. The amounts indicated were the minimum contributions to the two programs.

3 This figure was approximate. Final contribution to Special Fund to be announced later.

4 A contribution of $1.666,667 equivalent had been pledged to the Expanded Program and the Special Fund. The distribution of this amount between the two programs to be announced later.

5 Contributions subject to condition that a total of $100 million be reached for both programs.

6 A total of $2,899,671 equivalent was announced for the Expanded Program and the Special Fund. The division of this amount between the two programs to be announced later.

7 Special Fund contribution subject to condition that $100 million be reached for both programs.

8 A contribution of $38 million was pledged to the Expanded Program and the Special Fund. The contribution was subject to the condition that it would not exceed 40 percent of the total contributions to the two programs. The specific amounts for each program were to be announced later when pledges from other governments were known.