Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-4wdfl Total loading time: 0.736 Render date: 2022-07-04T01:05:09.204Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Honor Among Thieves: Understanding Rhetorical and Material Cooperation Among Violent Nonstate Actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2021

Get access

Abstract

Cooperation among militant organizations contributes to capability but also presents security risks. This is particularly the case when organizations face substantial repression from the state. As a consequence, for cooperation to emerge and persist when it is most valuable, militant groups must have means of committing to cooperation even when the incentives to defect are high. We posit that shared ideology plays this role by providing community monitoring, authority structures, trust, and transnational networks. We test this theory using new, expansive, time-series data on relationships between militant organizations from 1950 to 2016, which we introduce here. We find that when groups share an ideology, and especially a religion, they are more likely to sustain material cooperation in the face of state repression. These findings contextualize and expand upon research demonstrating that connections between violent nonstate actors strongly shape their tactical and strategic behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahms, Max, and Potter, Philip B.K.. 2015. Explaining Terrorism: Leadership Deficits and Militant Group Tactics. International Organization 69 (2):311–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team. 2020. Eleventh Report of the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team Submitted Pursuant to Resolution 2501 (2019) Concerning the Taliban and Other Associated Individuals and Entities Constituting a Threat to the Peace, Stability and Security of Afghanistan. United Nations Security Council.Google Scholar
Asal, Victor, Brown, Mitchell, and Dalton, Angela. 2012. Why Split? Organizational Splits Among Ethnopolitical Organizations in the Middle East. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (1):94117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asal, Victor, Cousins, Ken, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2015. Making Ends Meet: Combining Organizational Data in Contentious Politics. Journal of Peace Research 52 (1):134–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asal, Victor, Park, Hyun Hee, Karl Rethemeyer, R., and Ackerman, Gary. 2016. With Friends Like These … Why Terrorist Organizations Ally. International Public Management Journal 19 (1):130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asal, Victor, and Rethemeyer, R. Karl. 2008. The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks. Journal of Politics 70 (2):437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, Scott, Axelrod, Robert, and Davis, Richard. 2007. Sacred Barriers to Conflict Resolution. Science 317 (5841):1039–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacon, Tricia. 2017. Hurdles to International Terrorist Alliances: Lessons from Al Qaeda's Experience. Terrorism and Political Violence 29 (1):79101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Tricia. 2018. Why Terrorist Groups Form International Alliances. University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Tricia, and Arsenault, Elizabeth Grimm. 2019. Al Qaeda and the Islamic State's Break: Strategic Strife or Lackluster Leadership? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 42 (3):229–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakke, Kristin M. 2014. Help Wanted? The Mixed Record of Foreign Fighters in Domestic Insurgencies. International Security 38 (4):150–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bapat, Navin A., and Bond, Kanisha D.. 2012. Alliances Between Militant Groups. British Journal of Political Science 42 (4):793824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basedau, Matthias, Pfeiffer, Birte, and Vüllers, Johannes. 2016. Bad Religion? Religion, Collective Action, and the Onset of Armed Conflict in Developing Countries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (2):226–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylouny, Anne Marie, and Mullins, Creighton A.. 2018. Cash Is King: Financial Sponsorship and Changing Priorities in the Syrian Civil War. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 41 (12):990–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, Matthew. 2013. A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 57 (2):504–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Christopher W., Horowitz, Michael C., and Potter, Philip B.K.. Forthcoming. Leadership Targeting and Militant Alliance Breakdown. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Bloom, Mia. 2005. Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 1997. Time Is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4):1414–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2007. Paisley: Religion and Politics in Northern Ireland. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel L. 2013. Outside Support for Insurgent Movements. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 36 (12):9811004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel L. 2014. Buddies or Burdens? Understanding the al Qaeda Relationship with Its Affliate Organizations. Security Studies 23 (3):431–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B. 2012. A Blessing or a Curse? State Support for Terrorist Groups. International Organization 66 (1):129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christia, Fotini. 2012. Alliance Formation in Civil Wars. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIRI Human Rights Dataset. 2014. David L. Cingranelli, David L. Richards, and K. Chad Clay, principal investigators. Dataset version 2014.04.14. <http://www.humanrightsdata.com>..>Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha. 2019. Mapping Militant Organizations. Stanford University. Available at <https://cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/research/mapping_militant_organizations>.Google Scholar
Cronin, Audrey Kurth. 2009. How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, Laura, and Chenoweth, Erica. 2012. Moving Beyond Deterrence: The Effectiveness of Raising the Expected Utility of Abstaining from Terrorism in Israel. American Sociological Review 77 (4):597624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette, and Jones, Calvert. 2008. Assessing the Dangers of Illicit Networks: Why al-Qaida May Be Less Threatening Than Many Think. International Security 33 (2):744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elorza, Antonio, Garmendia, José Mari, Gurutz, Jáuregui, and Domınguez Iribarren, Florencio. 2006. La historia de ETA. Temas de Hoy.Google Scholar
Enders, Walter, Sandler, Todd, and Gaibulloev, Khusrav. 2011. Domestic Versus Transnational Terrorism: Data, Decomposition, and Dynamics. Journal of Peace Research 48 (3):319–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2019. Yes, Human Rights Practices Are Improving over Time. American Political Science Review 113 (3):868–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Michael. 2019. Fighting from the Pulpit: Religious Leaders and Violent Conflict in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (10):2262–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gade, Emily Kalah, Gabbay, Michael, Hafez, Mohammed M., and Kelly, Zane. 2019. Networks of Cooperation: Rebel Alliances in Fragmented Civil Wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (9):2071–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gade, Emily Kalah, Hafez, Mohammed M., and Gabbay, Michael. 2019. Fratricide in Rebel Movements: A Network Analysis of Syrian Militant Infighting. Journal of Peace Research 56 (3):321–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaibulloev, Khusrav. 2015. Terrorist Group Location Decision: An Empirical Investigation. Oxford Economic Papers 67 (1):2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaibulloev, Khusrav, Piazza, James A., and Sandler, Todd. 2017. Regime Types and Terrorism. International Organization 71 (3):491522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandrud, Christopher. 2015. simPH: An R Package for Illustrating Estimates from Cox Proportional Hazard Models Including for Interactive and Nonlinear Effects. Journal of Statistical Software 65 (3):120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnosis: Rivista Italiana di Intelligence. 2006. The Proletarian Armed Squads: Or Rather, Prison and Machine Guns. <http://gnosis.aisi.gov.it/gnosis/Rivista7.nsf/ServNavigE/21>..>Google Scholar
Government of the United States. 2003. National Strategy for Combating Terrorism.The White House. Available at <https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/ct/rls/wh/71803.htm>..>Google Scholar
Hastings, Justin V. 2010. No Man's Land: Globalization, Territory, and Clandestine Groups in Southeast Asia. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegghammer, Thomas. 2020. Abdallah Azzam and the Rise of Global Jihad. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentz, James J., and Solomon, Hussein, eds. 2017. Understanding Boko Haram: Terrorism and Insurgency in Africa. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Bruce, and McCormick, Gordon H.. 2004. Terrorism, Signaling, and Suicide Attack. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27 (4):243–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., Perkoski, Evan, and Potter, Philip B.K.. 2018. Tactical Diversity in Militant Violence. International Organization 72 (1):139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., and Potter, Philip B.K.. 2014. Allying to Kill: Terrorist Intergroup Cooperation and the Consequences for Lethality. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (2):199225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Dongfang, Gaibulloev, Khusrav, and Sandler, Todd. 2020. Introducing Extended Data on Terrorist Groups (EDTG), 1970 to 2016. Journal of Conflict Resolution 64 (1):199225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N., and Balcells, Laia. 2010. International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict. American Political Science Review 104 (3):415–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Tim. 2016. The Decline of American Engagement: Patterns in US Troop Deployments. Economics Working Paper 16101. Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Karmon, Ely. 2005. Coalitions Between Terrorist Organizations: Revolutionaries, Nationalists and Islamists. Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keels, Eric, and Wiegand, Krista. 2020. Mutually Assured Distrust: Ideology and Commitment Problems in Civil Wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 64 (10):2022–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Aliza. 2007. Blood and Belief: The PKK and the Kurdish Fight for Independence. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Jonathan Leader. 2019. Ideology and Armed Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 56 (5):635–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLauchlin, Theodore, and Pearlman, Wendy. 2012. Out-Group Conflict, In-Group Unity? Exploring the Effect of Repression on Intramovement Cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (1):4166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mir, Asfandyar. 2018. What Explains Counterterrorism Effectiveness? Evidence from the US Drone War in Pakistan. International Security 43 (2):4583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghadam, Assaf. 2017. Nexus of Global Jihad: Understanding Cooperation Among Terrorist Actors. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). 2019. Global Terrorism Database.Google Scholar
National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. 2006. Terrorism Knowledge Base.Google Scholar
Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 2011. Gist of Conversation, 11 October <https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ubl/english/Gist%20of%20conversation%20Oct%2011.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Parkinson, Sarah E. 2021. Practical Ideology in Militant Organizations. World Politics 73 (1):5281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedahzur, Ami, and Perliger, Arie. 2006. The Changing Nature of Suicide Attacks: A Social Network Perspective. Social Forces 84 (4):19872008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkoski, Evan. 2019. Internal Politics and the Fragmentation of Armed Groups. International Studies Quarterly 63 (4):876–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, Therése, and Öberg, Magnus. 2020. Organized Violence, 1989–2019. Journal of Peace Research 57 (4):597613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Brian J. 2014. Terrorist Group Cooperation and Longevity. International Studies Quarterly 58 (2):336–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Brian J. 2019. Do 90 Percent of Terrorist Groups Last Less Than a Year? Updating the Conventional Wisdom. Terrorism and Political Violence 31 (6):1255–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, James A. 2018. Transnational Ethnic Diasporas and the Survival of Terrorist Organizations. Security Studies 27 (4):607–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popovic, Milos. 2018. Inter-Rebel Alliances in the Shadow of Foreign Sponsors. International Interactions 44 (4):749–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Philip B.K., Plapinger, Samuel, and Blair, Christopher W.. 2020. The Puzzle of Large Alliance Networks. Unpublished article, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Price, Bryan C. 2018. Targeting Top Terrorists: Understanding Leadership Removal in Counterterrorism Strategy. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, David C. 2004. The Four Waves of Modern Terrorism. In Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy, edited by Cronin, Audrey Kurth and Ludes, James, 4673. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd. 2005. Collective Versus Unilateral Responses to Terrorism. Public Choice 124 (1–2):7593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanín, Francisco Gutiérrez, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2014. Ideology in Civil War: Instrumental Adoption and Beyond. Journal of Peace Research 51 (2):213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Jacob N. 2013. The Terrorist's Dilemma: Managing Violent Covert Organizations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Terrorism and Security: The Italian Experience. 1984. Report of the Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2017. The Extremist's Advantage in Civil Wars. International Security 42 (2):739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, David, Kruglanski, Arie, Molinario, Erica, and Jasko, Katarzyna. 2020. Ideologies that Justify Political Violence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 34:107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy M. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Asal, Victor, and Pate, Amy. 2011. Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior (MAROB) Middle East, 1980–2004.Google Scholar
Woldemariam, Michael. 2018. Insurgent Fragmentation in the Horn of Africa: Rebellion and Its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Kamil. 2014. Disengaging from Terrorism: Lessons from the Turkish Penitents. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zech, Steven T., and Gabbay, Michael. 2016. Social Network Analysis in the Study of Terrorism and Insurgency: From Organization to Politics. International Studies Review 18 (2):214–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Blair et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Blair et al. supplementary material

Blair et al. supplementary material

Download Blair et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 5 MB
2
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Honor Among Thieves: Understanding Rhetorical and Material Cooperation Among Violent Nonstate Actors
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Honor Among Thieves: Understanding Rhetorical and Material Cooperation Among Violent Nonstate Actors
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Honor Among Thieves: Understanding Rhetorical and Material Cooperation Among Violent Nonstate Actors
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *