Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-p6h7k Total loading time: 0.362 Render date: 2022-05-29T07:56:43.387Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Information, Uncertainty, and the Decision to Secede

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2006

Barbara F. Walter
Affiliation:
Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies at the University of California, San Diego, bfwalter@ucsd.edu
Get access

Abstract

Since 1980 almost half of all armed conflicts have been fought between governments and ethnic minority groups over self-determination, yet surprisingly little is known about when and why these conflicts occur. The few studies that do exist focus on the deep injustices and structural conditions that may cause some groups to seek greater autonomy or independence and others not. I argue that ethnic groups are much more strategic than current theories allow. Ethnic groups decide whether to challenge based in part on whether the government has made concessions in the past, and whether the government can be expected to do so again in the future. Data on all ethnic groups for the years 1940 to 2000 reveal that ethnic groups are significantly more likely to seek self-determination if the government has acquiesced to an earlier group of separatists, and if the government is unlikely to encounter additional ethnic challengers in the future. Grievances and opportunity matter, but so does the larger strategic environment in which the government and its ethnic groups operate.I thank Jon Caverley, Rui de Figueiredo Jr., Tanisha Fazal, Zoltan Hajnal, Oliver Kaplan, Jack Snyder, and participants at the Program on International Politics, Economics and Security at the University of Chicago for their very helpful comments and suggestions; Ted Gurr and David Quinn for their detailed information about the CIDCM data set; and Kathleen Cunningham and Idean Salehyan for excellent research assistance. Finally, I wish to thank the National Science Foundation for their support in funding this research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jon Lee. 2001. Home Fires: The Basque Separatists Are Escalating Their War Against Spain. New Yorker, 12 February, 4047.
Azar, Edward, and John Burton, eds. 1986. International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
Bartkus, Viva Ona. 1999. The Dynamic of Secession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bolton, Patrick, Gerard Roland, and Enrico Spolaore. 1996. Economic Theories of the Break-Up and Integration of Nations. European Economic Review 40 (3–5):697705.Google Scholar
Cetinyan, Rupen. 2002. Ethnic Bargaining in the Shadow of Third-Party Intervention. International Organization 56 (3):64578.Google Scholar
Choucri, Nazli. 1974. Population Dynamics and International Violence: Propositions, Insights and Evidence. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 2000. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Research Working Paper 2355. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Dixit, Avinash. 1982. Recent Developments in Oligopoly Theory. American Economic Review 72 (2):1217.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1986. Empires. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Encyclopedia Britannica. 1994. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379414.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2003. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2):195222.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review 97 (1):7590.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S. 2002. Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5):71224.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg, and Havard Strand. 2002. Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39 (5):61537.Google Scholar
Goemans, Henk Erich. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993a. Why Minorities Rebel: A Global Analysis of Communal Mobilization and Conflict Since 1945. International Political Science Review 14 (2):161201.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993b. Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2000. Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace.
Gurr, Ted Robert, and Will H. Moore. 1997. Ethnopolitical Rebellion: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 1980s with Risk Assessments for the 1990s. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4):1079103.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 1992. The Dynamics of Secession. Acta Sociologica 35 (4):26783.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Huntington, Samuel. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72 (3):2249.Google Scholar
Kennan, John, and Robert Wilson. 1993. Bargaining with Private Information. Journal of Economic Literature 31 (1):45104.Google Scholar
Keesings Record of World Events. 1940–2000. London, Longman.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):34761.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2001. Explaining Rare Events in International Relations. International Organization 55 (3):693715.Google Scholar
Kreps, David M., and Robert Wilson. 1982. Reputation and Imperfect Information. Journal of Economic Theory 27 (2):253279.Google Scholar
Levinson, David H. 1998. Ethnic Groups Worldwide: A Ready Reference Handbook. Phoeniz, Ariz.: Onyx Press.
Marshall, Monty G., and Ted Robert Gurr. 2003. Peace and Conflict, 2003: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy. Baltimore: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers. 2003. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003. Available at 〈http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/〉. Accessed 30 September 2005.
Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1982. Predation, Reputation, and Entry Deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory 27 (2):280312.Google Scholar
Moller, Herbert. 1968. Youth as a Force in the Modern World. Comparative Studies in Society and History 10 (3):23760.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Sally H. Campbell. 1991. Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War: So Why Kant Democracies Fight? Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):187211.Google Scholar
Morrison, Donald, Robert Mitchell, and John Paden. 1989. Black Africa: A Comparative Handbook. 2d ed. New York: Paragon Press.
Muller, Edward N., and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1987. Inequality and Insurgency. American Political Science Review 81 (2):42552.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2002. Bargaining Theory and International Conflict. Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1):130.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Robert W. 1981. Games of Perfect Information, Predatory Pricing and the Chain-Store Paradox. Journal of Economic Theory 25 (1):92100.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Joseph R., and Robert J. Thompson. 1985. Ethnoterritorial Movements and the Policy Process: Accommodating Nationalist Demands in the Developed World. Comparative Politics 17 (3):291311.Google Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas, and Annalisa Zinn. 2004. From Protest to Violence: An Analysis of Conflict Escalation with an Application to Self-Determination Movements. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
Scarritt, James R., and Shaheen Mozaffar. 1999. The Specification of Ethnic Cleavages and Ethnopolitical Groups for the Analysis of Democratic Competition in Africa. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 5 (1):82117.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, Richard. 1981. Economies of Scale and Barriers to Entry. Journal of Political Economy 89 (6):122838.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, Richard. 1983. Advertising and Entry Deterrence: An Exploratory Model. Journal of Political Economy 91 (4):63653.Google Scholar
Selten, Richard. 1978. The Chain-Store Paradox. Theory and Decision 9 (April):127159.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav. 2003. The Principle of Convergence in Wartime Negotiations. American Political Science Review 97 (4):62132.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.
Spence, Michael. 1973. Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3):35574.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Conflict. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Treisman, Daniel. 2004. Rational Appeasement. International Organization 58 (2):34574.Google Scholar
Urdal, Henrik. 2004. The Effect of Youth Bulges on Domestic Armed Conflict, 1950–2000. Social Development Paper 14. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Walter, Barbara F. 2003. Explaining the Intractability of Territorial Conflict. International Studies Review 5 (4):13753.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2004a. Why Governments Accommodate Some Ethnic Separatists but Not Others. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.
Walter, Barbara F. 2004b. The Strategic Logic of Secession. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.
Ward, Michael D., and Kristian Gleditsch. 2002. Location, Location, Location: An MCMC Approach to Modeling the Spatial Context of War and Peace. Political Analysis 10 (3):24460.Google Scholar
World Development Indicators. 1990–2000. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Available at 〈http://www.worldbank.org/data/wdi2005/index.html〉. Accessed 30 September 2005.
World Factbook. Various years. Washington, D.C.: Central Intelligence Agency.
69
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Information, Uncertainty, and the Decision to Secede
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Information, Uncertainty, and the Decision to Secede
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Information, Uncertainty, and the Decision to Secede
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *