Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-47mcc Total loading time: 0.423 Render date: 2022-01-22T08:31:43.578Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Get access

Abstract

Scholars and observers of the international system often comment on the decreasing importance of international boundaries as a result of the growth of international economic and social exchanges, economic liberalization, and international regimes. They generally fail to note, however, that coercive territorial revisionism has markedly declined over the past half century—a phenomenon that indicates that in certain ways states attach greater importance to boundaries in our present era. In this article I first trace states' beliefs and practices concerning the use of force to alter boundaries from the birth of the Westphalian order in the seventeenth century through the end of World War II. I then focus on the increasing acceptance of the norm against coercive territorial revisionism since 1945. Finally, I analyze those instrumental and ideational factors that have influenced the strengthening of the norm among both Western and developing countries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Malcolm. 1996. Frontiers: Territory and State Formation in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1998. Seeds of Peaceful Change: The OSCE's Security Community Building Model. In Security Communities, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael N., 119–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, James A. III with DeFrank, Thomas M.. 1995. The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War, and Peace, 1989–1992. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Baranovsky, Vladimir. 1966. Conflicts in and Around Russia. In SIPRI Yearbook 1966, 251–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Jackson, Richard. 1997. International Conflict: A Chronological Encyclopedia of Conflicts and Their Management, 1945–1995. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Brecher, Michael. 1953. The Struggle for Kashmir. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Peter, and Bentley, G. Carter, eds. 1995. East Timor at the Crossroads. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Clark, Sir George. 1961. The Seventeenth Century. 2d ed. New York: Galaxy Books.Google Scholar
Clark, Sir George. 1972. Early Modern Europe from About 1450 to About 1720. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claude, Inis L. Jr 1964. Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization. 3d rev. ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Cobban, Alfred. 1969. The Nation State and National Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W., with Sinclair, Timothy J.. 1996. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, Alan J., ed. 1987. Border and Territorial Disputes. 2d ed. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. 1953. Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1996. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. In Debating the Democratic Peace, edited by Brown, Michael E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., 357. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Egerton, George William. 1978. Great Britain and the Creation of the League of Nations: Strategy, Politics, and International Organization, 1914–1919. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, David J. 1995. Beyond Sovereignty: Territory and Political Economy in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. In Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D., 247–77. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, Gregory, and Farrell, Henry. 1999. Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE and the “Construction” of Security in Post–Cold War Europe. International Organization 53 (3):505–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary. 1996. Chinese-Indian Relations and the Process of Building Confidence: Implications for the Asia-Pacific. The Pacific Review 9:5876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, and Karsh, Efraim. 1993. The Gulf Conflict, 1990–91: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fritsch-Bournazel, Renata. 1992. Europe and German Reunification. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D.. 1999. A Revised List of Independent States Since the Congress of Vienna. International Interactions 25 (4):393413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D.. 2000. War and Peace in Space and Time: The Role of Democratization. International Studies Quarterly 44 (1):130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul F.. 1992. Territorial Changes and International Conflict. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Erik. 1992. War and Peace Treaties, 1816–1991. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haller-Trost, R. 1990. The Spratly Islands: A Study on the Limitations of International Law. Canterbury: Centre of South-East Asian Studies, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
Hensel, Paul R. 1999. Charting a Course to Conflict: Territorial Issues and Interstate Conflict, 1816–1992. In A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict, edited by Diehl, Paul F., 115–46. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul, and Thompson, Grahame. 1996. Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holbrooke, Richard. 1998. To End a War. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Michael. 1978. War and the Liberal Conscience. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Hurewitz, J. C. 1950. The Struggle for Palestine. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K. 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1993. The Weight of Ideas in Decolonization: Normative Change in International Relations. In Ideas and Foreign Policy, edited by Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., 111–38. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., and Rosberg, Carl G.. 1982. Why Africa's Weak States Persist. World Politics 35 (1):124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Ian. 1994. Aftermath of the Gulf War: An Assessment of UN Action. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Kacowicz, Arie Marcelo. 1994. Peaceful Territorial Change. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kaysen, Carl. 1990. Is War Obsolete? A Review Essay. International Security 14 (4):4264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knock, Thomas J. 1992. To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korbel, Josef. 1966. Danger in Kashmir. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Korman, Sharon. 1996. The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layachi, Azzedine. 1994. The OAU and Western Sahara: A Case Study. In The Organization of African Unity After Thirty Years, edited by El-Ayouty, Yassin, 2739. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Liberman, Peter. 1996. Does Conquest Pay? The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Xuecheng. 1994. The Sino-Indian Border Dispute and Sino-Indian Relations. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lloyd George, David. 1936. War Memoirs of David Lloyd George, vol. 5. London: Ivor Nicholson and Watson.Google Scholar
Lo, Chi-kin. 1989. China's Policy Towards Territorial Disputes: The Case of the South China Sea. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward. 1996. A Post-Heroic Military Policy. Foreign Affairs 75 (4):3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Michael J. 2000. World War I: A Short History. 2d ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Charles G. 1990. Iran, Iraq, and the Cease-fire Negotiations: Contemporary Legal Issues. In The Persian Gulf War: Lessons for Strategy, Law, and Diplomacy, edited by Joyner, Christopher C., 209–23. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, S. Neil. 1999. Western Engagement in the Caucasus and Central Asia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, S. Neil, and Minear, Larry. 1997. Humanitarian Action and Politics: The Case of Nagorno-Karabakh. Providence, R.I.: The Watson Institute for Brown University.Google Scholar
Makovsky, David. 1996. Making Peace with the PLO: The Rabin Government's Road to the Oslo Accord. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Maresca, John J. 1985. To Helsinki: The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1973–1975. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Robert. 1989. The Problem of Cyprus. Adelphi Papers, No. 234. London: International Institute of Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
McKay, Derek, and Scott, H. M.. 1983. The Rise of the Great Powers, 1648–1815. New York: Longman Group.Google Scholar
Menon, Rajan. 1998. After Empire: Russia and the Southern “Near Abroad.” In The New Russian Foreign Policy, edited by Mandelbaum, Michael. 100–66. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Miller, David Hunter, ed. 1928. The Drafting of the Covenant, vol. 2. New York: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Prins, Brandon C.. 1999. Beyond Territorial Contiguity: Issues at Stake in Democratic Militarized Interstate Disputes. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John. 1989. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society. International Organization 44 (4):479526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Necatigil, Zaim M. 1989. The Cyprus Question and the Turkish Position in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, David. 1999. Real Spaces, Symbolic Spaces: Interrelated Notions of Territory in the Arab-Israeli Conflict. In A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict, edited by Diehl, Paul F., 334. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Ohmae, Kenichi. 1990. The Borderless World. New York: Harper Business.Google ScholarPubMed
Ohmae, Kenichi. 1995. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Owen, John M. IV. 1997. Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Fred. 1993. Latin America. In States in a Changing World, edited by Jackson, Robert H. and James, Alan, 240–61. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Preece, Jennifer Jackson. 1998. National Minorities and the European Nation-States System. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, Victor. 1998. Contributions of the United Nations to Solving Boundary and Territorial Disputes, 1945–1997. In The United Nations at Work, edited by Glasner, Martin Ira, 239–84. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard. 1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard. 1996. The Rise of the Virtual State. Foreign Affairs 75 (4):4561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 47 (1):139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1999. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. In Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D., 215–46. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, Antholis, William, Ember, Carol R., Ember, Melvin, and Maoz, Zeev. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post–Cold War World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm. 1986. Title to Territory in Africa: International Legal Issues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisson, Richard, and Rose, Leo E.. 1990. War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.Google Scholar
Small, Melvin, and Singer, J. David. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Stimson, Henry L., and Bundy, McGeorge. 1948. On Active Service in Peace and War. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P. 1954. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1814–1918. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Janice E., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1989. Global Transactions and the Consolidation of Sovereignty. In Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges, edited by Czempiel, Ernst-Otto and Rosenau, James N., 195219. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Touval, Saadia. 1972. The Boundary Politics of Independent Africa. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turley, William S. 1986. The Second Indochina War. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Ullman, Richard H., ed. 1996. The World and Yugoslavia's Wars. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
van der Veur, Paul W. 1964. The United Nations in West Irian: A Critique. International Organization 18 (1):5373.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A., and Henehan, Marie T.. 2001. Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research 38 (2):123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hippel, Karin. 1995. The Non-intervention Norm Prevails: An Analysis of the Western Sahara. Journal of Modern Africa 33:6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallensteen, Peter, and Sollenberg, Margareta. 1998. Armed Conflict and Regional Conflict Complexes, 1989–97. Journal of Peace Research 35(5):621–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jianwei. 2000. Bilateral Territorial Disputes in the Asia-Pacific Security Order. Presented to the Security Order in the Asia-Pacific Second Workshop, Bali, Indonesia, 29 May–2 June.Google Scholar
Webber, Mark. 1997. CIS Integration Trends: Russia and the Former Soviet South. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Weller, Marc. 1992. The International Response to the Dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. American Journal of International Law 86 (3):569607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetten, Lawrence L. 1974. The Canal War: Four-Power Conflict in the Middle East. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wild, Patricia Berko. 1966. The Organization of African Unity and the Algerian-Moroccan Border Conflict. International Organization 20 (1): 1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacher, Mark W. 1979. International Conflicts and Collective Security, 1946–77: The United Nations, Organization of American States, Organization of African Unity, and Arab League. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Zacher, Mark W., and Matthew, Richard A.. 1995. Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands. In Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, edited by Kegley, Charles W. Jr107–50. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Zimmern, Alfred. 1939. The League of Nations and the Rule of Law, 1918–1935. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
208
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *