Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-6vg6l Total loading time: 0.275 Render date: 2022-12-05T21:52:00.180Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2006

Stacie E. Goddard
Affiliation:
Wellesley College, sgoddard@wellesley.edu
Get access

Abstract

In Jerusalem, Ireland, Kosovo, and Kashmir, indivisible territory underlies much of international conflict. I argue whether or not territory appears indivisible depends on how actors legitimate their claims to territory during negotiations. Although actors choose their legitimations strategically, in order to gain a political advantage at the bargaining table, legitimation strategies have unintended structural consequences: by resonating with some actors and not others, legitimations either build ties between coalitions and allow each side to recognize the legitimacy of each other's claims, or else lock actors into bargaining positions where they are unable to recognize the legitimacy of their opponent's demands. When the latter happens, actors come to negotiations with incompatible claims, constructing the territory as indivisible. I apply this legitimation theory to Ulster, arguing this territory's indivisibility was not inevitable, but a product of actors' legitimation strategies as they battled for support over the issue of Ireland's right to self-rule.For comments on this article, I thank Fiona Adamson, Tim Crawford, Consuelo Cruz, Ron Hassner, Jeff Herbst, Robert Jervis, Robert Keohane, Ron Krebs, Paul MacDonald, Daniel Nexon, John Padgett, Dan Reiter, Jack Snyder, Monica Toft, two anonymous reviewers, as well as participants in a seminar at the John M. Olin Institute at Harvard University. In addition, the John M. Olin Institute, the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, the Center for International Studies at Princeton University, and the Center for International Studies at the University of Southern California all provided support for this project.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, Andrew. 1995. Things of Boundaries. Social Research 62 (4):85782.Google Scholar
Albin, Cecilia. 1993. Resolving Conflicts over Indivisibles Through Negotiation: The Case of Jerusalem. Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Baguley, David. 2000. Napoleon III and His Regime: An Extravaganza. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Press.
Bearman, Peter. 1993. Relations into Rhetorics: Local Elite Social Structure in Norfolk, England, 1540–1640. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Bew, Paul. 1987. Conflict and Conciliation in Ireland, 1890–1910. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Boyce, D. George. 1970. British Conservative Opinion, the Ulster Question, and the Partition of Ireland, 1912–21. Irish Historical Studies 17 (65):89112.Google Scholar
Boyce, D. George. 1990. Nineteenth-Century Ireland: The Search for Stability. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Breuilly, John. 1996. The Formation of the First German Nation-State, 1800–1871. London: Macmillan.
Buckland, Patrick. 1973. Ulster Unionism and the Origins of Northern Ireland, 1886–1922. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2002. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):55388.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Cruz, Consuelo. 2000. Identity and Persuasion: How Nations Remember Their Pasts and Make Their Futures. World Politics 52 (3):275312.Google Scholar
Curtis, Lewis Perry. 1988. Moral and Physical Force: The Language of Violence in Irish Nationalism. Journal of British Studies 27 (2):15089.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul, ed. 1999. A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press.
Durkheim, Emile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method. Edited by Steven Lukes. New York: Free Press.
Echard, William E. 1983. Napoleon III and the Concert of Europe. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
Elster, Jon. 1989. Solomonic Judgements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon. 1995. Strategic Uses of Argument. In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, edited by Kenneth Arrow, 23657. New York: W.W. Norton.
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Jeff Goodwin. 1994. Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency. American Journal of Sociology 99 (6):141154.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):57792.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379414.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Commitment Problems and the Spread of Ethnic Conflict. In The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation, edited by David Lake and Donald S. Rothchild, 10726. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Finnemore, Martha, and Katherine Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.Google Scholar
Foster, R. F. 1980. To the Northern Counties: Lord Randolph Churchill and the Prelude to the Orange Card. In Ireland under the Union: Varieties of Tension, Essays in Honor of T. W. Moody, edited by F. S. L. Lyons and R. A. J. Hawkins, 23787. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gagnon, V. P. 1995. Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict. International Security 19 (3):13066.Google Scholar
Gailey, Andrew. 1984. Unionist Rhetoric and Irish Local Government Reform, 1895–9. Irish Historical Studies 24 (93):5268.Google Scholar
Galvin, Richard F., and Charles Lockhart. 1990. Discrete Idiosyncratic Goods and Structural Principles of Distributive Justice. Journal of Politics 52 (4):1182204.Google Scholar
Garvin, Tom. 1996. 1922: The Birth of Irish Democracy. New York: St. Martins Press.
Gladstone, William E. 1990. The Gladstone Diaries. Vol. 11, edited by H. C. G. Matthew. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1969. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay of the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Gould, Roger V. 1991. Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. American Sociological Review 56 (6):71629.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6):136079.Google Scholar
Gwynn, Denis. 1932. The Life of John Redmond. London: Harrap.
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hammond, J. L. 1964. Gladstone and the Irish Nation. Hamden, Conn.: Archon.
Hansard's Parliamentary Debates. Various years. London: Hansard.
Hassner, Ron. 2003. To Halve and to Hold: Conflicts over Sacred Space and the Problem of Indivisibility. Security Studies 12 (4):133.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1994. Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Society. Political Theory 22 (2):20318.Google Scholar
Jackson, Alvin. 1989. The Ulster Party: Irish Unionists in the House of Commons, 1884–1911. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jackson, Alvin. 2001. Irish Unionism, 1870–1922. In Defenders of the Union, edited by D. George Boyce and Alan O'Day, 11536. London: Routledge.
Jackson, Patrick T. 2003. Defending the West: Occidentalism and the Formation of NATO. Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3):22352.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T., and Daniel H. Nexon. 1999. Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3):291332.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jalland, Patricia. 1980. The Liberals and Ireland: The Ulster Question in British Politics to 1914. Sussex: Harvester Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1989. Logic of Images in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jervis, Robert. 1997. Systems Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kendle, John. 1989. Ireland and the Federal Solution: The Debate over the United Kingdom Constitution, 1870–1921. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Kim, Hyojoung, and Peter S. Bearman. 1997. The Structure and Dynamics of Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 62 (1):7093.Google Scholar
Kniss, Fred. 1996. Ideas and Symbols as Resources in Intrareligious Conflict: The Case of American Mennonites. Sociology of Religion 57 (1):723.Google Scholar
Laffan, Michael. 1999. The Resurrection of Ireland: The Sinn Féin Party, 1916–1923. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larkin, Emmet. 1975. Church, State, and Nation in Modern Ireland. American Historical Review 80 (5):12441276.Google Scholar
Loughlin, James. 1986. Gladstone, Home Rule and the Ulster Question 1882–93. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Lustick, Ian S. 1993. Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Lyons, F. S. L. 1948. The Irish Unionist Party and the Devolution Crisis of 1904–5. Irish Historical Studies 6 (21):122.Google Scholar
Lyons, F. S. L. 1968. John Dillon. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lyons, F. S. L. 1977. Charles Stewart Parnell. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lyons, F. S. L. 1985. Ireland Since the Famine. 2d ed. London: Fontana.
MacDonald, Paul K. 2002. The Virtues of Ambiguity. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New York.
March, James G., and Johan Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
Matthew, H. C. G. 1990. Introduction. In The Gladstone Diaries, Vol. 10, edited by H. C. G. Matthew, xxviicxcii. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McAdam, Douglas. 1986. Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer. American Journal of Sociology 92 (1):6490.Google Scholar
McAdam, Douglas, and Ronnelle Paulsen. 1993. Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism. American Journal of Sociology 99 (3):64067.Google Scholar
McAdam, Douglas, Sydney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCombs, Maxwell E. 1981. The Agenda-Setting Approach. In Handbook of Political Communication, edited by D. D. Nimmo and Keith R. Sanders, 12140. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
McLean, Iain. 2001. Rational Choice and British Politics: An Analysis of Rhetoric and Manipulation from Peel to Blair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLean, Paul D. 1998. A Frame Analysis of Favor Seeking in the Renaissance: Agency, Networks, and Political Culture. American Journal of Sociology 104 (1):5191.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann, and Harrison White. 1998. Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics Across Network Domains. Social Research 65 (3):695724.Google Scholar
Moody, T. W. 1967. Irish-American Nationalism. Irish Historical Studies 15 (60):43845.Google Scholar
Newman, David. 1999. Real Spaces, Symbolic Spaces: Interrelated Notions of Territory in the Arab-Israeli Conflict. In A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict, edited by Paul Diehl, 334. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press.
Nexon, Daniel H. 2004. Sovereignty, Religion, and the Fate of Empires in Early Modern Europe. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, New York.
O'Brien, Conor Cruise. 1957. Parnell and His Party, 1880–90. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
O'Day, Alan. 1998. Irish Home Rule, 1867–1921. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Padgett, John, and Christopher Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98 (6):1259319.Google Scholar
Pflanze, Otto. 1963. Bismarck and the Development of Germany. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Pillar, Paul R. 1983. Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):42760.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Lets Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):139.Google Scholar
Savage, D. C. 1961. The Origins of the Ulster Unionist Party, 1885–6. Irish Historical Studies 12 (47):185208.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Schön, Donald A., and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
Sebenius, James K. 1983. Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization 37 (2):281316.Google Scholar
Shipkey, Robert Carl. 1987. Robert Peel's Irish Policy, 1812–1846. New York: Garland.
Simmel, Georg. 1968. The Conflict in Modern Culture. Translated by K. Peter Etzkorn. New York: Teachers College Press.
Simmel, Georg. 1990. The Philosophy of Money. New York: Routledge.
Smith, Jeremy. 1993. Bluff, Bluster, and Brinkmanship: Andrew Bonar Law and the Third Home Rule Bill. Historical Journal 36 (1):16178.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4):46481.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Stubbs, John O. 1990. The Unionists and Ireland, 1914–1918. The Historical Journal 33 (4):86793.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1998a. Contentious Conversation. Social Research 65 (3):491510.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1998b. International Communities, Secure or Otherwise. In Security Communities, edited by Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett, 397412. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Toft, Monica. 2002. Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War. Security Studies 12 (2):82119.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walter, Barbara. 2000. Explaining the Apparent Indivisibility of Territory. Paper presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Washington, D.C.
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88 (2):38496.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, Harrison. 1995. Network Switchings and Bayesian Forks: Reconstructing the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Social Research 62 (4):103563.Google Scholar
95
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *