Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Best Evidence: The Role of Information in Domestic Judicial Enforcement of International Human Rights Agreements

  • Yonatan Lupu (a1)
Abstract

Independent domestic courts play important roles in enforcing international human rights agreements, thereby providing a mechanism by which international institutions can affect government policy. Yet this enforcement power is constrained not only by independence but also by the courts' ability to overcome information problems. Domestic courts' enforcement power depends on information in two ways: the costs of producing legally admissible evidence of abuses and the applicable legal standards of proof. When countries ratify international agreements, judicial enforcement can improve government practices when evidence-production costs and standards of proof are low, but not otherwise. With respect to personal integrity rights violations, evidence is especially difficult to obtain, and standards of proof are high, meaning that the courts will not be able to constrain government practices. By contrast, evidence-production costs and standards of proof are lower for other civil rights violations, so courts will be able to prosecute offenders and bring governments into line with their international commitments. Consistent with this theory, I find that commitments to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) have significantly improved governments' respect for the freedoms of speech, association, assembly, and religion. With respect to personal integrity rights, however, I find that commitments to the ICCPR have not improved government practices.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alter, Karen J. 2008. Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context. European Journal of International Relations 14 (1):3363.
Amnesty International. 1977. Report of an Amnesty International Mission to Argentina, 6–15 November 1976. London: Amnesty International.
Apodaca, Clair. 2004. The Rule of Law and Human Rights. Judicature 87 (6):292–99.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1981 [1825]. A Treatise on Judicial Evidence. In Treatise on Judicial Evidence, Extracted from the Manuscripts of Jeremy Bentham, edited by Dumont, M.. Littleton, Colo.: Rothman and Company.
Blitt, Robert Charles. 2004. Who Will Watch the Watchdogs? Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations and the Case for Regulation. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 10:261398.
Bull, Jesse, and Watson, Joel. 2004. Evidence Disclosure and Verifiability. Journal of Economic Theory 118 (1):131.
Cingranelli, David L., and Richards, David L.. 2010a. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. Available at ⟨http://www.humanrightsdata.org/⟩. Accessed 14 January 2013.
Cingranelli, David L., and Richards, David L.. 2010b. Short Variable Descriptions for Indicators in the Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. Available at ⟨http://www.humanrightsdata.org/documentation/ciri_variables_short_descriptions.pdf⟩. Accessed 14 January 2013.
Conrad, Courtenay R.Forthcoming. Divergent Incentives for Dictators: Domestic Institutions and (International Promises Not to) Torture. Journal of Conflict Resolution.
Conrad, Courtenay R., and Moore, Will H.. 2010. What Stops the Torture? American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):459–76.
Cooter, Robert D., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. 1989. Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution. Journal of Economic Literature 27 (3):1067–97.
Cross, Frank B. 1999. The Relevance of Law in Human Rights Protection. International Review of Law and Economics 19 (1):8798.
Dai, Xinyuan. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Damaska, Mirjan. 1973. Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121 (3):506–89.
Damaska, Mirjan. 1992. Of Hearsay and Its Analogues. Minnesota Law Review 76 (3):425–58.
Davenport, Christian. 1995. Multi-Dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions. American Journal of Political Science 39 (3):683713.
Davenport, Christian. 1999. Human Rights and the Democratic Proposition. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (1):92116.
Davenport, Christian. 2007a. State Repression and Political Order. Annual Review of Political Science 10:123.
Davenport, Christian. 2007b. State Repression and the Tyrannical Peace. Journal of Peace Research 44 (4):485504.
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):397406.
Downs, George W., and Jones, Michael A.. 2002. Reputation, Compliance, and International Law. Journal of Legal Studies 31 (S1):S95114.
Engel, Christoph. 2009. Preponderance of the Evidence Versus Intime Conviction: A Behavioral Perspective on a Conflict Between American and Continental European Law. Vermont Law Review 33 (3):435–67.
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franck, Thomas M., and Fairley, H. Scott. 1980. Procedural Due Process in Human Rights Fact-Finding by International Agencies. American Journal of International Law 74 (2):304–45.
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., 173206. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Gibney, Mark, and Dalton, Matthew. 1996. The Political Terror Scale. Policy Studies and Developing Nations 4:7384.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem. International Organization 62 (4):689716.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2012. International Regimes for Human Rights. Annual Review of Political Science 15:265–86.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Helfer, Laurence R., and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2011. Emergency and Escape: Explaining Derogations from Human Rights Treaties. International Organization 65 (4):673707.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology 110 (5):1373–411.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2007. Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law to Matter Where Needed Most. Journal of Peace Research 44 (4):407–25.
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111 (8):19352042.
Hathaway, Oona A. 2007. Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (4):588621.
Heckman, James. 1997. Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations. Journal of Human Resources 32 (3):441–62.
Heckman, James, Ichimura, Hidehiko, Smith, Jeffrey, and Todd, Petra. 1998. Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data. Econometrica 66 (5):1017–98.
Heckman, James, Smith, Jeffrey, and Clements, Nancy. 1997. Making the Most Out of Social Experiments: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Program Impacts. Review of Economic Studies 64 (4):487535.
Helfer, Laurence R. 2002. Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash Against Human Rights Regimes. Columbia Law Review 102 (7):1832–911.
Henderson, Conway W. 1991. Conditions Affecting the Use of Political Repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (1):120–42.
Hill, Daniel W. Jr. 2010. Estimating the Effects of Human Rights Treaties on State Behavior. Journal of Politics 72 (4):1161–74.
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2007. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15 (3):199236.
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2011. MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference. Journal of Statistical Software 42 (8):128.
Honaker, James, King, Gary, and Blackwell, Matthew. 2011. Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data (Special Vol.). Journal of Statistical Software 45 (7):147.
Johnson, Simon, McMillan, John, and Woodruff, Christopher. 2002. Courts and Relational Contracts. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 18 (1):221–77.
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Keith, Linda Camp. 1999. The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does It Make a Difference in Human Rights Behavior? Journal of Peace Research 36 (1):95118.
Keith, Linda Camp. 2002. Judicial Independence and Human Rights Protection Around the World. Judicature 85 (4):195200.
Keith, Linda Camp, Tate, C. Neal, and Poe, Steven C.. 2009. Is the Law a Mere Parchment Barrier to Human Rights Abuse? Journal of Politics 71 (2):644–60.
Kelley, Judith. 2007. Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements. American Political Science Review 101 (3):573–89.
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Lechner, Michael. 2000. An Evaluation of Public-Sector-Sponsored Continuous Vocational Training Programs in East Germany. Journal of Human Resources 35 (2):347–75.
Little, Roderick J.A., and Rubin, Donald B.. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Lupu, Yonatan. Forthcoming. The Informative Power of Treaty Commitment: Using the Spatial Model to Address Selection Effects. American Journal of Political Science.
Lutz, Ellen L., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2000. International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America. International Organization 54 (3):633–59.
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2007. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2006. Dataset Users' Manual. Center for Systemic Peace. College Park: University of Maryland. Available at ⟨http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2006.pdf⟩. Accessed 14 January 2013.
McCauliff, C.M.A. 1982. Burdens of Proof: Degrees of Belief, Quanta of Evidence, or Constitutional Guarantees? Vanderbilt Law Review 35 (6):1293–335.
McCormick, James M., and Mitchell, Neil J.. 1997. Human Rights Violations, Umbrella Concepts, and Empirical Analysis. World Politics 49 (4):510–25.
McCubbins, Mathew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1):165–79.
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1994. Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Moore, Will H. 2000. The Repression of Dissent: A Substitution Model of Government Coercion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (1):107–27.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2):217–52.
Neumayer, Eric. 2005. Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (6):925–53.
Newman, Jon O. 2006. Quantifying the Standard of Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: A Comment on Three Comments. Law, Probability and Risk 5 (3-4):267–69.
Orentlicher, Diane F. 1990. Bearing Witness: The Art and Science of Human Rights Fact-Finding. Harvard Human Rights Journal 3:83135.
Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Png, I.P.L. 1986. Optimal Subsidies and Damages in the Presence of Judicial Error. International Review of Law and Economics 6 (1):101–5.
Poe, Steven C. 2004. The Decision to Repress: An Integrative Theoretical Approach to the Research on Human Rights and Repression. In Understanding Human Rights Violations: New Systematic Studies, edited by Carey, Sabine C. and Poe, Steven C., 1642. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Poe, Steven C., and Tate, C. Neil. 1994. Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis. American Political Science Review 88 (4):853–72.
Poe, Steven C., Tate, C. Neil, and Keith, Linda Camp. 1999. Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly 43 (2):291313.
Polinsky, A. Mitchell, and Shavell, Steven. 1989. Legal Error, Litigation, and the Incentive to Obey the Law. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 5 (1):99108.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Staton, Jeffrey K.. 2009. Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation. International Studies Quarterly 53 (1):149–74.
PRS Group. 2007. International Country Risk Guide: ICRG Risk Ratings. East Syracuse, N.Y.: PRS Group. Available at ⟨http://www.prsgroup.com/CountryData_AvailableData.aspx⟩. Accessed 14 January 2013.
Ratner, Steven R., and Abrams, Jason S.. 2001. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rubin, Donald B. 1997. Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores. Annals of Internal Medicine 127 (8):757–63.
Rubinfeld, Daniel L., and Sappington, David E. M.. 1987. Efficient Awards and Standards of Proof in Judicial Proceedings. RAND Journal of Economics 18 (2):308–15.
Sanchirico, Chris William. 2004. Evidence Tampering. Duke Law Journal 53 (4):1215–336.
Sanchirico, Chris William. 2006. Detection Avoidance. New York University Law Review 81 (4):1331–99.
Sanchirico, Chris William, and Triantis, George. 2007. Evidentiary Arbitrage: The Fabrication of Evidence and the Verifiability of Contract Performance. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 24 (1):7294.
Sartori, Anne E. 2003. An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions. Political Analysis 11 (2):111–38.
Simmons, Beth A. 2000. International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs. American Political Science Review 94 (4):819–35.
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, Beth A., and Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2005. The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods. American Political Science Review 99 (4):623–31.
Simon, Rita James, and Mahan, Linda. 1971. Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the Classroom. Law and Society Review 5 (3):319–30.
Simpson, John, and Bennett, Jana. 1985. The Disappeared and the Mothers of the Plaza: The Story of the 11,000 Argentinians Who Vanished. New York: St. Martins Press.
Smith, Jeffrey A., and Todd, Petra E.. 2005. Does Matching Overcome LaLonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators? Journal of Econometrics 125 (1-2):305–53.
Snow, Clyde Collins, Peccerelli, Fredy Armando, Susanavar, Jose Samuel, Robinson, Alan G., and Ochoa, Jose Maria Najera. 2008. Hidden in Plain Sight: X.X. Burials and the Desaparecidos in the Department of Guatemala, 1977–1986. In Statistical Methods for Human Rights, edited by Asher, Jana, Banks, David, and Scheuren, Fritz J., 89116. New York: Springer.
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Moore, Will H.. 2011. Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics. International Organization 65 (3):553–87.
Taruffo, Michele. 2003. Rethinking the Standards of Proof. American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (3):659–77.
Tate, C. Neal, and Keith, Linda Camp. 2007. Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Judicial Independence Globally. Paper presented at the 103rd annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Chicago.
Tillers, Peter, and Gottfried, Jonathan. 2006. Case Comment: United States v. Copeland, 369 F. Supp. 2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): A Collateral Attack on the Legal Maxim that Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Is Unquantifable? Law, Probability and Risk 5 (2):135–57.
Tullock, Gordon. 1980. Trials on Trial: The Pure Theory of Legal Procedure. New York: Columbia University Press.
United Nations Treaty Collection (UNTC). Available at ⟨http://treaties.un.org/home.aspx⟩. Accessed 1 November 2008.
Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal, and Skolnikoff, Eugene B., eds. 1998. The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Voeten, Erik. 2000. Clashes in the Assembly. International Organization 54 (2):185215.
Von Stein, Jana. 2005. Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance. American Political Science Review 99 (4):611–22.
Weinstein, Jack B., and Dewsbury, Ian. 2006. Comment on the Meaning of “Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.” Law, Probability and Risk 5 (2):167–73.
Weissbrodt, David, and McCarthy, James. 1982. Fact-Finding by Nongovernmental Organizations. In International Law and Fact-Finding in the Field of Human Rights, edited by Ramcharan, B.G., 186230. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Wigmore, John H. 1981. Evidence in Trials at Common Law. New York: Little Brown.
Winston, Morton E. 2001. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Human Rights NGOs: Amnesty International. In NGOs and Human Rights: Promise and Performance, edited by Welch, Claude E. Jr., 2554. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wright, Richard W. 2009. Proving Facts: Belief Versus Probability. In European Tort Law 2008, edited by Koziol, Helmut and Steininger, Barbara C., 79105. Vienna: Springer.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed