Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 88
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Chyzh, Olga 2016. Keeping Up WithWhichJoneses: Spatial Diffusion of Rule of Law Through Economic International Organizations. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. orw023.

    Escribà-Folch, Abel 2016. Foreign direct investment and the risk of regime transition in autocracies. Democratization, p. 1.

    Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R. 2016. Democratization During the Third Wave. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 125.

    Kneuer, Marianne and Demmelhuber, Thomas 2016. Gravity centres of authoritarian rule: a conceptual approach. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 5, p. 775.

    Makdisi, Samir 2016. Development Challenges and Solutions after the Arab Spring.

    Nelson, Stephen C. and Wallace, Geoffrey P. R. 2016. Are IMF lending programs good or bad for democracy?. The Review of International Organizations,

    Powell, Jonathan Lasley, Trace and Schiel, Rebecca 2016. Combating Coups d’état in Africa, 1950–2014. Studies in Comparative International Development,

    Bader, Julia 2015. China, Autocratic Patron? An Empirical Investigation of China as a Factor in Autocratic Survival. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, Issue. 1, p. 23.

    Benthuysen, John Van 2015. In-between anarchy and interdependence: from state death to fragile and failing states. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 36, Issue. 1, p. 22.

    Boduszyński, Mieczysław P. 2015. The external dimension of Libya's troubled transition: the international community and ‘democratic knowledge’ transfer. The Journal of North African Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 5, p. 735.

    Bonhomme, Stéphane and Manresa, Elena 2015. Grouped Patterns of Heterogeneity in Panel Data. Econometrica, Vol. 83, Issue. 3, p. 1147.

    Burgess, Robin Miguel, Edward and Stanton, Charlotte 2015. War and deforestation in Sierra Leone. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 10, Issue. 9, p. 095014.

    Fukuoka, Yuki 2015. Who brought down the dictator? A critical reassessment of so-called ‘People power’ revolutions in the Philippines and Indonesia. The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 411.

    Lim, Sijeong Menaldo, Victor and Prakash, Aseem 2015. Foreign aid, economic globalization, and pollution. Policy Sciences, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 181.

    Owen, John M. and Herbert, Roger G. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Steinberg, David A. Koesel, Karrie J. and Thompson, Nicolas W. 2015. Political Regimes and Currency Crises. Economics & Politics, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 337.

    Swinerd, Chris and McNaught, Ken R. 2015. Comparing a simulation model with various analytic models of the international diffusion of consumer technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 100, p. 330.

    Treisman, Daniel 2015. Income, Democracy, and Leader Turnover. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 4, p. 927.

    Wobig, Jacob 2015. Defending democracy with international law: preventing coup attempts with democracy clauses. Democratization, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 631.

    Aidt, Toke S. and Jensen, Peter S. 2014. Workers of the world, unite! Franchise extensions and the threat of revolution in Europe, 1820–1938. European Economic Review, Vol. 72, p. 52.


Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization

  • Kristian Skrede Gleditsch (a1) and Michael D. Ward (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 October 2006

Democracy does not evolve sui generis. The spatial clustering in democracy and transitions suggests that international factors play a prominent role in forging democracies as well as influencing their durability. We argue that democracy often comes about as a result of changes in the relative power of important actors and groups as well as their evaluations of particular institutions, both of which are often influenced by forces outside the country in question. The scope and extent of connections with other democratic countries in a region can strengthen support for democratic reform and help sustain institutions in transitional democracies. Results from a transition model demonstrate that international factors can exert a strong influence on the prospects for transitions to democracy, and the spatial clustering in democracy and transitions cannot adequately be explained by the hypothesized domestic social requisites of individual countries.We are grateful for comments from Brian A'Hearn, Kyle Beardsley, Nathaniel Beck, Scott Gates, Håvard Hegre, David Lektzian, Jon Pevehouse, Dan Reiter, Kenneth Schultz, Heather Smith, Håvard Strand, and Kaare Strøm, the editors, and two anonymous reviewers, as well as the participants at the Conference on the International Diffusion of Democracy and Markets, University of California, Los Angeles, March 2003, and the Conference on the International Diffusion of Political and Economic Liberalization at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., October 2003.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *