Meissner, Richard 2017. Paradigms and Theories Influencing Policies in the South African and International Water Sectors.
Müller, Harald 2017. Richard Ned Lebow: A Pioneer in International Relations Theory, History, Political Philosophy and Psychology.
Pashakhanlou, Arash Heydarian 2017. Realism and Fear in International Relations.
Wolfe, S. E. and Brooks, David B. 2017. Mortality awareness and water decisions: a social psychological analysis of supply-management, demand-management and soft-path paradigms. Water International, Vol. 42, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Branch, Jordan 2016. How should states be shaped? Contiguity, compactness, and territorial rights. International Theory, Vol. 8, Issue. 01, p. 1.
Dowding, Keith 2016. Emotional appeals in politics and deliberation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, p. 1.
HEAD, NAOMI 2016. A politics of empathy: Encounters with empathy in Israel and Palestine. Review of International Studies, Vol. 42, Issue. 01, p. 95.
Holmes, Marcus 2016. You Never Get a Second Chance to Make a First Impression? First Encounters and Face-Based Threat Perception. Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 1, Issue. 4, p. 285.
Jäder, Jonas Sidenvall, Johan and Sumpter, Lovisa 2016. Students’ Mathematical Reasoning and Beliefs in Non-routine Task Solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
Kertzer, Joshua D. and Brutger, Ryan 2016. Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 1, p. 234.
Pursiainen, Christer Henrik and Matveeva, Angelica 2016. Initiating Trust in High Politics: The Gorbachev-Reagan Summit in Geneva 1985. International Negotiation, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 104.
Wight, Colin 2016. Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity.
Brugger, Philipp 2015. Trust as a discourse: Concept and measurement strategy – First results from a study on German trust in the USA. Journal of Trust Research, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 78.
Delis, Manthos D. and Mylonidis, Nikolaos 2015. Trust, happiness, and households’ financial decisions. Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 20, p. 82.
Green, Kimberly M. 2015. Economics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.
Hagström, Linus and Gustafsson, Karl 2015. Japan and identity change: why it matters in International Relations. The Pacific Review, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Hall, Todd H. and Ross, Andrew A.G. 2015. Affective Politics after 9/11. International Organization, Vol. 69, Issue. 04, p. 847.
Holmes, Marcus 2015. Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly, p. n/a.
Holmes, Marcus and Traven, David 2015. Acting Rationally Without Really Thinking: The Logic of Rational Intuitionism for International Relations Theory. International Studies Review, p. n/a.
Ibrion, Michaela Parsizadeh, Farokh Naeini, Maryam Pakdaman Mokhtari, Mohammad and Nadim, Farrokh 2015. Handling of dead people after two large earthquake disasters in Iran: Tabas 1978 and Bam 2003 – Survivors' perspectives, beliefs, funerary rituals, resilience and risk. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 11, p. 60.
A belief in alien abduction is an emotional belief, but so is a belief that Iran intends to build nuclear weapons, that one's country is good, that a sales tax is unjust, or that French decision makers are irresolute. Revolutionary research in the brain sciences has overturned conventional views of the relationship between emotion, rationality, and beliefs. Because rationality depends on emotion, and because cognition and emotion are nearly indistinguishable in the brain, one can view emotion as constituting and strengthening beliefs such as trust, nationalism, justice or credibility. For example, a belief that another's commitment is credible depends on one's selection (and interpretation) of evidence and one's assessment of risk, both of which rely on emotion. Observing that emotion and cognition co-produce beliefs has policy implications: how one fights terrorism changes if one views credibility as an emotional belief.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.