Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:16:27.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emotions and the Micro-Foundations of Commitment Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2017

Jonathan Renshon ,
Julia J. Lee  and
Dustin Tingley
Get access

Abstract

While emotions are widely regarded as integral to the “behavioral approach” to International Relations (IR), a host of fundamental problems have delayed the integration of affective influences into traditional models of IR. We aim to integrate affect by focusing on commitment problems, a body of work that contains strong theoretical predictions about how individual decision makers will and should act. Across two lab experiments, we use a novel experimental protocol that includes a psychophysiological measure of emotional arousal (skin conductance reactivity) to study how individuals react to changes in bargaining power. While we find support for one key pillar of IR theory—individuals do reject offers when they expect the opponent's power to increase—we also find that physiological arousal tampers with individuals’ ability to think strategically in the manner predicted by canonical models. Our follow-up experiment mimics the elements of institutional solutions to commitment problems and finds support for their efficacy on the individual level. Our novel findings suggest that when individuals face large power shifts, emotional arousal short-circuits their ability to “think forward and induct backwards,” suggesting that emotionally aroused individuals are less prone to commitment problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 71 , Supplement S1 , April 2017 , pp. S189 - S218
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Graham T. 1969. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review 63 (3):689–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, Dan, Gneezy, Uri, Loewenstein, George, and Mazar, Nina. 2009. Large Stakes and Big Mistakes. The Review of Economic Studies 76 (2):451–69.Google Scholar
Bayram, A. Burcu. 2017. Due Deference: Cosmopolitan Social Identity and the Psychology of Legal Obligation. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S137–S163.Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland, and Hutchison, Emma. 2008. Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics. Review of International Studies 34 (1):115–35.Google Scholar
Blight, James G. 1992. The Shattered Crystal Ball: Fear and Learning in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Blount, Sally. 1995. When Social Outcomes Aren't Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 (2):131–44.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. 2003. Behavioural Studies of Strategic Thinking in Games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (5):225–31.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. 2011. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Civai, Claudia, Acqua, Corrado Corradi-Dell, Gamer, Matthias, and Rumiati, Raffaella I.. 2010. Are Irrational Reactions to Unfairness Truly Emotionally Driven? Dissociated Behavioural and Emotional Responses in the Ultimatum Game Task. Cognition 114 (1):89–95.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2000. The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships. International Security 24 (4):116–56.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2008. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
De Sousa, Ronald. 1987. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, Alan. 1984. Middle East Crisis: US Decision Making in 1958, 1970, and 1973. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan. 2008. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59:255–78.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan, and Over, David E.. 1996. Rationality and Reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Wendi L., Gabriel, Shira, and Diekman, Amanda B.. 2000. Interpersonal Processes. In Handbook of Psychophysiology, 2nd ed., edited by Cacioppo, John T., Tassinary, Louis G., and Berntson, Gary G., 643–64. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Regier, Terry. 1996. How Do We Tell an Association From a Rule? Comment on Sloman (1996). Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):23–26.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, Alberta S., and Judd, Ben B.. 1994. Working Memory and Bias in Reasoning Across the Life Span. Psychology and Aging 9 (3):356–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimm, Veronika, and Mengel, Frederike. 2011. Let Me Sleep on It: Delay Reduces Rejection Rates in Ultimatum Games. Economics Letters 111 (2):113–15.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Haggard, Stephan, Lake, David A., and Victor, David G.. 2017. The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S1–S31.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie. M., Hughes, D. Alex, and Victor, David G. 2013. The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics 11 (2):368–86.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review 108 (4):814–34.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hall, Todd H., and Ross, Andrew A.G.. 2015. Affective Politics After 9/11. International Organization 69 (4):847–79.Google Scholar
Harris, David. 2004. The Crisis: The President, the Prophet, and the Shah—1979 and the Coming of Militant Islam. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K. 2017. How Attachments to the Nation Shape Beliefs About the World: A Theory of Motivated Reasoning. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S61–S84.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1970. Individual Differences in “Definition of the Situation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 14 (3):303–10.Google Scholar
Holt, Charles A., and Laury, Susan K.. 2001. Varying the Scale of Financial Incentives Under Real and Hypothetical Conditions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):417–17.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, and Tingley, Dustin. 2010. A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis. Psychological Methods 15 (4):309–34.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 (2):296–312.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist 58 (9):697–720.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2):263–91.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2017. Resolve, Time, and Risk. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S109–S136.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen F. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lambourne, Kate, and Tomporowski, Phillip. 2010. The Effect of Exercise-Induced Arousal on Cognitive Task Performance: A Meta-Regression Analysis. Brain Research 1341:12–24.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D., and List, John A.. 2007. What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2):153–74.Google Scholar
Loewen, Peter John, Sheffer, Lior, Soroka, Stuart N., Walgrave, Stefaan, and Shaefer, Tamir. 2014. Are Politicians Better Risky Decision Makers? Evidence from Experiments with Members of Parliament in Belgium, Canada, and Israel. Working paper.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George, and Lerner, Jennifer S.. 2003. The Role of Affect in Decision Making. In Handbook of Affective Sciences, edited by Davidson, Richard J., Scherer, Klaus R., and Goldsmith, H. Hill, 619–42. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004a. The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4):691–706.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004b. Political Psychology in International Relations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Patrick R. 2011. The Emotional Citizen: Emotion as a Function of Political Sophistication. Political Psychology 32 (4):575–600.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2007. Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition. American Political Science Review 101 (4):621–35.Google Scholar
Myers, Dan, and Tingley, Dustin H.. 2016. Influence of Emotions on Trust. Political Analysis 24 (4):492–500.Google Scholar
Odell, John, and Tingley, Dustin. 2013. Negotiating Agreements in International Relations. International Relations Working Group of the American Political Science Association 2013 Task Force on Negotiating Agreements in Politics . Available at: <http://www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Task%20Force%20Reports/Chapter7Mansbridge.pdf>. Accessed 30 January 2017.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R. 1988. The Rationality of Decision Making During International Crises. Polity 20 (4):598–622.Google Scholar
Osman, Magda. 2004. An Evaluation of Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 (6):988–1010.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review 92 (1):1–22.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2006. War As a Commitment Problem. International Organization 60 (1):169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quek, Kai. 2017. Rationalist Experiments on War. Political Science Research and Methods 5 (1):123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., and Paradis, Mark. 2017. Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-Method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S33–S59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan. 2015. Losing Face and Sinking Costs: Experimental Evidence on the Judgment of Political and Military Leaders. International Organization 69 (3):659–95.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan, J. Lee, Julia, and Tingley, Dustin. 2015. Physiological Arousal and Political Beliefs. Political Psychology 36 (5):569–85.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan, and Lerner, Jennifer. 2012. The Role of Emotions in Foreign Policy Decision Making. In Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology, edited by Christie, Daniel J. and Montiel, Cristina, 313–17. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan, Yarhi-Milo, Keren, and Kertzer, Joshua D.. 2015. Democratic Leaders, Resolve and War: Experimental Evidence from the Knesset. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Rho, Sungmin, and Tomz, Michael. 2017. Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest? In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S85–S108.Google Scholar
Sanfey, Alan G., Rilling, James K., Aronson, Jessica A., Nystrom, Leigh E., and Cohen, Jonathan D.. 2003. The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 300 (5626):1755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2017. No Substitute for Experience: Presidents, Advisers, and Information in Group Decision Making. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S219–S247.Google Scholar
Sequeira, Henrique, and Roy, Jean-Claude. 1997. Neural Control of Electrodermal Activity. In Central Nervous Control of Autonomic Function, Vol. 11 , edited by Jordan, David, 259–93. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sloman, Steven A. 1996. The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3–22.Google Scholar
Stern, Sheldon M. 2005. The Week the World Stood Still: Inside the Secret Cuban Missile Crisis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin. 2011. The Dark Side of the Future: An Experimental Test of Commitment Problems in Bargaining. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2):521–44.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin. 2017. Rising Power on the Mind. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S165–S188.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin, and Walter, Barbara. 2011a. Can Cheap Talk Deter? An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (6):994–1018.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin, and Walter, Barbara. 2011b. The Effect of Repeated Play on Reputation Building: An Experimental Approach. International Organization 65 (2):343–65.Google Scholar
VanderWeele, Tyler J., Valeri, Linda, and Ogburn, Elizabeth L. 2012. The Role of Measurement Error and Misclassification in Mediation Analysis. Epidemiology 23 (4):561–64.Google Scholar
Van't Wout, Mascha, Kahn, Rene S., Sanfey, Alan G., and Aleman., Andre 2006. Affective State and Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Experimental Brain Research 169 (4):564–68.Google Scholar
Welch, David. 2003. Culture and Emotion as Obstacles to Good Judgment. In Good Judgment in Foreign Policy: Theory and Application, edited by Renshon, Stanley and Larson, Deborah Welch, 483–507. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob. 2002. Bush at War. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Renshon supplementary material

Renshon supplementary material

Download Renshon supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 136.4 KB