Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

From Mercenary to Citizen Armies: Explaining Change in the Practice of War

Abstract

Mercenary armies went out of style in the nineteenth century; it became common sense that armies should be staffed with citizens. I argue that even though realist explanations focusing on the fighting prowess of citizen armies and sociological explanations focusing on the fit between citizen armies and prevailing ideas can rationalize this change, they cannot explain it. I examine, instead, the politics behind the new reliance on citizen armies and argue that material and ideational turmoil provided important antecedent conditions for change. Beyond this, individual states were more likely to move toward citizen armies when they had been defeated militarily and when the ruling coalition was split or indifferent about the reforms tied to citizen armies. Finally, the apparent success of citizen armies in France and then Prussia made do mestic conditions for reform easier to obtain in other countries, reinforcing the likelihood that the solution would be replicated. I conclude that the interaction between domestic politics and path dependency provides a promising source of hypotheses for explaining the conditions under which new ways of war emerge and spread.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Howard Bailes . 1981. Patterns of Thought in the Late Victorian Army. The Journal of Strategic Studies 4 (1): 2945.

Stephen Biddle . 1997. The Gulf War Debate Redux: Why Skill and Technology Are the Right Answer. International Security 22 (2): 163–74.

David D. Bien 1979. The Army in the French Enlightenment: Reform, Reaction, and Revolution. Past and Present 85: 6898.

Pierre Bourdieu . 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

H. C. Burmester 1978. The Recruitment and Use of Mercenaries in Armed Conflicts. American Journal of International Law 72 (1): 3756.

Andrew P. Cortell , and James W. Davis . 1996. How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 451–78.

Martha Finnemore , and Katherine Sikkink . 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887918.

Peter Gourevitch . 1978. The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics. International Organization 32 (4): 881912.

Miles Kahler . 1998. Rationality in International Relations. International Organization 52 (4): 919–41.

Jack Knight . 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

James G. March , and Johan P. Olsen . 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4): 943–70.

Douglass C. North 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barry R. Posen 1993. Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power. International Security 18 (2): 80124.

João Resende-Santos . 1996. Anarchy and the Emulation of Military Systems: Military Organization and Technology in South America, 1870–1930. Security Studies 5 (3): 193260.

Thomas Risse-Kappen . 1994. Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War. International Organization 48 (2): 185214.

Ronald Rogowski . 1987. Trade and the Variety of Domestic Institutions. International Organization 41 (2): 203–23.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1993b. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 47 (1): 139–74.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4): 855–85.

Theda Skocpol . 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Janice E. Thomson 1995. State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research. International Studies Quarterly 39(2): 213–34.

Amos Tversky , and Daniel Kahneman . 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211 (44):453–58.

Amos Tversky , and Daniel Kahneman . 1988. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. In Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, edited by David E. Bell , Howard Raiffa , and Amos Tversky . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander Wendt . 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391425.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 155 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 440 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.