Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Gender Stereotyping and Chivalry in International Negotiations: A Survey Experiment in the Council of the European Union

  • Daniel Naurin, Elin Naurin and Amy Alexander
Abstract

Gender stereotypes—stylized expectations of individuals’ traits and capabilities based on their gender—may affect the behavior of diplomats and the processes of international negotiations. In a survey experiment in the Council of the European Union, we find that female representatives behaving stereotypically weak and vulnerable may trigger a chivalry reaction among male representatives, increasing the likelihood that the men will agree to support a bargaining proposal from the women. The effect is conditional on the negotiators’ cultural background—the chivalry reaction is displayed mainly by diplomats from countries with relatively low levels of gender equality. Our study contributes to the research on nonstandard behavior in international relations, and in particular the expression and reception of emotions in diplomacy. We argue that gender stereotypes may have a moderating impact on decision making based on such intuitive cognitive processes. We also add to the broader negotiation literature, both by showing the pervasiveness of gender stereotyping, and by testing at the elite level the generalizability of claims regarding gender effects derived from laboratory experiments. Overall, our findings demonstrate the importance of bringing gender into the study of international negotiations, where it has been largely and surprisingly ignored.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Gender Stereotyping and Chivalry in International Negotiations: A Survey Experiment in the Council of the European Union
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Gender Stereotyping and Chivalry in International Negotiations: A Survey Experiment in the Council of the European Union
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Gender Stereotyping and Chivalry in International Negotiations: A Survey Experiment in the Council of the European Union
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

Financial support was provided by the Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond). We thank the editor and reviewers of IO for their very helpful comments and suggestions, Karin Aggestam for a stimulating and fruitful project collaboration, and Markus Johansson for excellent research assistance.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. Opting Out of the European Union: Diplomacy, Sovereignty and European Integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Aggestam, Karin, and Towns, Ann, eds. 2017. Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aharoni, Sarai. 2011. Gender and “Peace Work”: An Unofficial History of Israeli-Palestinian Peace Negotiations. Politics and Gender 7 (3):391416.
Alexander, Amy C., and Welzel, Christian. 2011. Explaining Women's Empowerment: The Role of Emancipative Beliefs. European Sociological Review 27 (3):364–84.
Babcock, Linda, and Laschever, Sara. 2003. Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baron-Cohen, Simon, and Wheelwright, Sally. 2004. The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34 (2):163–75.
Barron, Lisa A. 2003. Gender Differences in Negotiators’ Beliefs. Human Relations 56 (6):635–62.
Benton, Alan A. 1973. Reactions to Demands to Win from an Opposite Sex Opponent. Journal of Personality 41 (3):430–42.
Benton, Alan A. 1975. Bargaining Visibility and the Attitudes and Negotiation Behavior of Male and Female Group Representatives. Journal of Personality 43 (4):661–67.
Boyer, Mark A., Urlacher, Brian, Hudson, Natalie F., Niv-Solomon, Anat, Janik, Laura L., Butler, Michael J., Brown, Scott W., and Ioannou, Andri. 2009. Gender and Negotiation: Some Experimental Findings from an International Negotiation Simulation. International Studies Quarterly 53 (1):2347
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1):6382.
Byrnes, James P., Miller, David C., and Schafer, William D.. 1999. Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125 (3):367–83.
Cantrell, Stephen R., and Butler, John K.. 1997. Male Negotiators: Chivalry or Machismo or Both? Psychological Reports 80 (3):1315–23.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59 (4):801–26.
Croson, Rachel, and Gneezy, Uri. 2009. Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economics Literature 47 (2):448–74.
Davis, Mark H. 1983. Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1):113–26.
Deaux, Kay, and Kite, Mary E.. 1987. Thinking About Gender. In Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research, edited by Hess, Beth B. and Ferree, Myra Marx, 92117. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Eagly, Alice H. 1983. Gender and Social Influence: A Social Psychological Analysis. American Psychologist 38 (9):971–81.
Eagly, Alice H., and Wood, Wendy. 1991. Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (3):306–15.
Eckel, Catherine C., and Grossman, Philip J.. 2008. Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence. In Handbook of Experimental Economic Results, edited by Plott, Charles and Smith, Vernon, 1061–73. New York: Elsevier.
Eisenberg, Nancy, and Lennon, Randy. 1983. Sex Differences in Empathy and Related Capacities. Psychological Bulletin 94 (1):100–31.
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in the New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fiske, Susan T., and Stevens, Laura E.. 1993. What's So Special About Sex? Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination. In Gender Issues in Contemporary Society, edited by Oskamp, Stuart and Costanzo, Mark, 173–96. London: Sage.
Florea, Natalie B., Boyer, Mark A., Brown, Scott W., Butler, Michael J., Hernandez, Magnolia, Weir, Kimberly, Meng, Lin, Johnson, Paula R., Lima, Clarisse, Mayall, Hayley J.. 2003. Negotiating from Mars to Venus: Gender in Simulated International Negotiations. Simulation Gaming 34 (2):226–48.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Haggard, Stephan, Lake, David A., and Victor, David G.. 2017. The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations. International Organization 71 (S1):S1S31.
Häge, Frank M. 2013. Bureaucrats as Law-Makers: Committee Decision-Making in the EU Council of Ministers. London, UK: Routledge.
Hagemann, Sara, and Höyland, Bjorn. 2008. Parties in the Council? Journal of European Public Policy 15 (8):1205–21.
Hall, Todd. 2015. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hall, Todd, and Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2012. The Personal Touch: Leaders’ Impressions, Costly Signaling, and Assessments of Sincerity in International Affairs. International Studies Quarterly 56 (3):560–73.
Holmes, Marcus, and Yarhi-Milo, Karen. 2016. The Psychological Logic of Peace Summits: How Empathy Shapes Outcomes of Diplomatic Negotiations. International Studies Quarterly 61 (1):107–22.
Humbert, Anne L., Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, Viginta, Oetke, Nicole S., and Paats, Merle. 2016. Gender Equality Index 2015: Measuring Gender Equality in the European Union 2005–2012. Vilnius, Lithuania: European Institute for Gender Equality.
Hutchison, Emma, and Bleiker, Roland. 2014. Theorizing Emotions in World Politics. International Theory 6 (3):491514.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Kantola, Johanna. 2010. Gender and the European Union. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Shaker, Lee. 2012. Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation. American Political Science Review 106 (3):33547.
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Reciprocity in International Relations. International Organization 40 (1):127.
Kray, Laura J., and Thompson, Leigh. 2005. Gender Stereotypes and Negotiation Performance: An Examination of Theory and Research. Research in Organizational Behavior 26:103–82.
Kray, Laura J., Thompson, Leigh, and Galinsky, Adam. 2001. Battle of the Sexes: Gender Stereotype Confirmation and Reactance in Negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (6):942–58.
King, Wesley C. Jr., Miles, Edward W., and Kniska, Jane. 1991. Boys Will Be Boys (and Girls Will Be Girls): The Attribution of Gender Roles Stereotypes in a Gaming Situation. Sex Roles 25 (11/12):607–23.
König, Thomas, and Junge, Dirk. 2009. Why Don't Veto Players Use Their Power? European Union Politics 10 (4):507–34.
Lewis, Jeffrey. 1998. Is the “Hard Bargaining” Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (4):479504.
McKibben, Heather. E. 2013. The Effects of Structures and Power on State Bargaining Strategies. American Journal of Political Science 57 (2):411–27.
McKibben, Heather E., and Western, Shaina D.. 2013. Levels of Linkage: Across-Agreement Versus Within-Agreement Explanations of Consensus Formation among States. International Studies Quarterly 58 (1):4454.
Mehrabian, Albert, Young, Andrew L., and Sato, Sharon. Emotional Empathy and Associated Individual Differences. Current Psychology, Research and Reviews 7 (3):221–40.
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Naurin, Daniel. 2015. Generosity in Intergovernmental Negotiations: The Impact of State Power, Pooling and Socialisation in the Council of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research 54 (4):726–44.
Odell, John. 2013. Negotiation and Bargaining. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 379400. London, UK: Sage.
Orbell, John, Dawes, Robyn, and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 1994. Trust, Social Categories and Individuals: The Case of Gender. Motivation and Emotion 18 (2):109–28.
Plantenga, Janneke, Remery, Chantel, Figueiredo, Hugo, and Smit, Mark. 2009. Towards a European Union Gender Equality Index. Journal of European Social Policy 19 (1):1933.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):139.
Rueckert, Linda, and Naybar, Nicolette. 2008. Gender Differences in Empathy: The Role of the Right Hemisphere. Brain and Cognition 67 (2):162–67.
Sainsbury, Diane, eds. 1999. Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Steans, Jill. 2013. Gender and International Relations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Steele, Claude M., and Aronson, Joshua. 1995. Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Threat Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5):797811.
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization 56 (2):339–74.
Stone, Randall W. 2011. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stuhlmacher, Alice F., and Walters, Amy E.. 1999. Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcome: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology 52 (3):653–77.
Sylvester, Christine. 2001. Feminist International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, Robert. 2011. Resolving Controversy in the European Union. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tickner, Ann J., and Laura Sjoberg, , eds. 2011. Feminism and International Relations. New York: Routledge.
Towns, Ann, and Niklasson, Birgitta. 2016. Gender, International Status, and Ambassador Appointments. Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (3):521–40.
United Nations. 2000. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, S/RES/1325 (31 October 2000). Available at <http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/wps/#resolution>
Walters, Amy E., Stuhlmacher, Alice F., and Meyer, Lia L.. 1998. Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (1):129.
Walton, Richard E., and McKersie, Robert B.. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wang, Zhen, and Lim, John. 2007. The Effect of Gender Composition and Negotiation Support Systems in Dyadic Setting. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07). Hawaii, 36 January 2007. Waikoloa, HI: IEEE.
Welzel, Christian. 2013. Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Naurin et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (254 KB)
254 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed