Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences

  • Diana C. Mutz and Eunji Kim


Using a population-based survey experiment, this study evaluates the role of in-group favoritism in influencing American attitudes toward international trade. By systematically altering which countries gain or lose from a given trade policy (Americans and/or people in trading partner countries), we vary the role that in-group favoritism should play in influencing preferences.

Our results provide evidence of two distinct forms of in-group favoritism. The first, and least surprising, is that Americans value the well-being of other Americans more than that of people outside their own country. Rather than maximize total gains, Americans choose policies that maximize in-group well-being. This tendency is exacerbated by a sense of national superiority; Americans favor their national in-group to a greater extent if they perceive Americans to be more deserving.

Second, high levels of perceived intergroup competition lead some Americans to prefer trade policies that benefit the in-group and hurt the out-group over policies that help both their own country and the trading partner country. For a policy to elicit support, it is important not only that the US benefits, but also that the trading partner country loses so that the US achieves a greater relative advantage. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding bipartisan public opposition to trade.



Hide All
Aaroe, Lene, and Petersen, Michael Bang. 2014. Crowding Out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues. The Journal of Politics 76 (3):684–97.
Bartlett, Donald L., and Steele, James B.. 2012. The Betrayal of the American Dream. New York: Public Affairs.
Brown, Rupert. 2000. Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems and Future Challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (6): 775–78.
Fordham, Benjamin O., and Kleinberg, Katja B.. 2012. How Can Economic Interests Influence Support for Free Trade? International Organization 66 (2):311–28.
Freeland, Chrystia. 2011. The Rise of the New Global Elite. The Atlantic, January/February, 4455.
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hayes, Andrew F., and Matthes, Jörg. 2009. Computational Procedures for Probing Interactions in OLS and Logistic Regression: SPSS and SAS Implementations. Behavior Research Methods 41 (3):924–36.
Hiscox, Michael J. 2006. Through a Glass and Darkly: Attitudes Toward International Trade and the Curious Effect of Issue Framing. International Organization 60 (3):755–80.
Hoffman, Michael E.S. 2004. Politico-Economic Determinants of American Trade Policy Attitudes. Unpublished manuscript, Norte Dame, South Bend, IN
Hogg, Michael A., and Abrams, Dominic. 1990. Social Motivation, Self-Esteem and Social Identity. In Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, edited by Abrams, Dominic and Hogg, Michael A., 2847. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hogg, Michael A., Fielding, Karen S., and Darley, John. 2005. Fringe Dwellers: Processes of Deviance and Marginalization in Groups. The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion. In Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion edited by Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A., and Marques, José M., 191210. New York: Psychology Press.
Huddy, Leonie. 2001. From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory. Political Psychology 22 (1):127–56.
Huddy, Leonie, and Khatib, Nadia. 2007. American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement. American Journal of Political Science 51 (1):6477.
Ip, Greg. 2016. The Rise of Zero-Sum Economics. Wall Street Journal, 20 July. Available at <>. Accessed 6 September 2016.
Irwin, Douglas A. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Johnston, Christopher D. 2013. Dispositional Sources of Economic Protectionism. Public Opinion Quarterly 77 (2):574–85.
Jost, John T., Federico, Christopher M., and Napier, Jamie L.. 2009. Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology 60:307–37.
Kinder, Donald R., and Kam, Cindy D. 2010. Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations for American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. Sociotropic Politics: The American Case. British Journal of Political Science 11 (2):129–61.
Lan, Xiaohuan, and Li, Ben. 2011. Nationalism and International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Working Paper 36412. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Available at <>. Accessed 6 September 2016.
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 3rd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2009. Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety. International Organization 63 (3):425–57.
Mansfield, Edward D., Mutz, Diana C., and Silver, Laura 2015. Men, Women, Trade, and Free Markets. International Studies Quarterly 59 (2):303–15.
Margalit, Yotam. 2012. Lost in Globalization: International Economic Integration and the Sources of Popular Discontent. International Studies Quarterly 56 (3):484500.
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others? European Economic Review 49 (6):1393–430.
Merolla, Jennifer, Stephenson, Laura B., Wilson, Carole J., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2005. Globalization, Globalización, Globalisation: Public Opinion and NAFTA. Law and Business Review of the Americas. 11 (3–4):573–96.
Miller, David. 2005. Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1–2):6381.
Mutz, Diana C. 2014. Is Trade Perceived to Be Zero Sum? American Perceptions of the Impact of Trade on US and Trading Partner Countries. Paper presented to the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Sinnott, Richard. 2001. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence. In Brookings Trade Forum, edited by Collins, Susan M. and Rodrik, Dani, 157206. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Pinto, Pablo M., and Le Foulon, Carmen M.. 2007. The Individual Sources of Economic Nationalism: Evidence from Survey Data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Plutarch, Lucius M. 1957. Moralia, Vol. 12. Translated by Cherniss, Harold. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pratto, Felicia, Çidam, Atilla, Stewart, Andrew L., Zeineddine, Fouad Bou, et al. 2013. Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals: Contextual Moderation of Robust Effects of Social Dominance Orientation in Fifteen Languages and Twenty Countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science 4 (5):587–99.
Pratto, Felicia, Sidanius, James, Stallworth, Lisa M., and Malle, Bertram F.. 1994. Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (4):741–63.
Rankin, David M. 2001. Identities, Interests, and Imports. Political Behavior 23 (4):351–76.
Reich, Robert B. 1990. Do We Want US to Be Rich or Japan Poor? Wall Street Journal, 18 June, A10.
Rousseau, David L. 2002. Motivations for Choice: The Salience of Relative Gains in International Politics. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (3):394426.
Rueda, David, and Stegmueller, Daniel. 2017. Who Wants What? Redistribution Preferences in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished manuscript.
Sabet, Shahrzad. 2013. What's in a Name? Isolating the Effect of Prejudice on Individual Trade Preferences. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting. Available at SSRN <>.
Sidanius, Jim, Haley, Hillary, Molina, Ludwin, and Pratto, Felicia. 2007. Vladimir's Choice and the Distribution of Social Resources: A Group Dominance Perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 10 (2):257–65.
Sidanius, Jim, and Pratto, Felicia. 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slaughter, Matthew J. 1999. Globalisation and Wages: A Tale of Two Perspectives. The World Economy 22 (5):609–29.
Slaughter, Matthew J. 2001. International Trade and Labor–Demand Elasticities. Journal of International Economics 54 (1):2756.
Stein, Arthur A. 1990. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Tajfel, Henry, and Turner, John C.. 1986. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Worchel, Stephen and Austin, William G., 724. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2009. Who Counts as an American? The Boundaries of National Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trump, Donald. 2016. Declaring America's Economic Independence. Speech, Alumisource, Monessen, PA, 28 June. Available at <>. Accessed 6 September 2016.
Turner, John C. 1975. Social Comparison and Social Identity: Some Prospects for Intergroup Behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 5 (1):134
Turner, John. C., Hogg, Michael A., Oakes, Penelope J., Reicher, Stephen D., and Wetherell, Margaret S.. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Tuschman, Avi. 2013. Our Political Nature: The Evolutionary Origins of What Divides Us. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary material

Mutz and Kim supplementary material
Supplementary data

 Unknown (681 KB)
681 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed