Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 39
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Drüner, Dietrich Klüver, Heike Mastenbroek, Ellen and Schneider, Gerald 2016. The core or the winset? Explaining decision-making duration and policy change in the European Union. Comparative European Politics,

    Guardiancich, Igor 2016. The ‘Leap’ from Coordination to Harmonization in Social Policy: Labour Mobility and Occupational Pensions in Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,

    Tallberg, Jonas Sommerer, Thomas Squatrito, Theresa and Lundgren, Magnus 2016. The performance of international organizations: a policy output approach. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, Issue. 7, p. 1077.

    Smeets, Sandrino 2015. Unanimity and exposure in the EU Council of Ministers - or how the Dutch won and lost the ICTY debate. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 54, Issue. 2, p. 288.

    König, Thomas and Luig, Bernd 2014. Ministerial gatekeeping and parliamentary involvement in the implementation process of EU directives. Public Choice, Vol. 160, Issue. 3-4, p. 501.

    Novak, Stéphanie 2013. The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 6, p. 1091.

    Schimmelfennig, Frank 2013. After Liberalism?.

    Verdun, Amy 2013. Decision-Making before and after Lisbon: The Impact of Changes in Decision-Making Rules. West European Politics, Vol. 36, Issue. 6, p. 1128.

    Jensen, Christian B. and Slapin, Jonathan B. 2012. Institutional hokey-pokey: the politics of multispeed integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, Issue. 6, p. 779.

    Jensen, Mads Dagnis and Nedergaard, Peter 2012. From ‘Frankenstein’ to ‘toothless vampire’? Explaining the watering down of the Services Directive. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, Issue. 6, p. 844.

    Mc Lean, Elena V. 2012. Donors’ Preferences and Agent Choice: Delegation of European Development Aid1. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 56, Issue. 2, p. 381.

    Roederer-Rynning, Christilla and Schimmelfennig, Frank 2012. Bringing codecision to agriculture: a hard case of parliamentarization. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, Issue. 7, p. 951.

    Rasmussen, Anne and Toshkov, Dimiter 2011. The Inter-institutional Division of Power and Time Allocation in the European Parliament. West European Politics, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 71.

    BÖRZEL, TANJA 2010. European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 191.

    LEUFFEN, DIRK and HERTZ, ROBIN 2010. If things can only get worse: Anticipation of enlargement in European Union legislative politics. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 53.

    Lewis, Jeffrey 2010. How institutional environments facilitate co-operative negotiation styles in EU decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 17, Issue. 5, p. 648.

    Nowak, Tobias 2010. Of Garbage Cans and Rulings: Judgments of the European Court of Justice in the EU Legislative Process. West European Politics, Vol. 33, Issue. 4, p. 753.

    Tallberg, Jonas 2010. Explaining the institutional foundations of European Union negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 17, Issue. 5, p. 633.


    ROBINSON, NICK 2009. The European Investment Bank: The EU's Neglected Institution. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 47, Issue. 3, p. 651.


In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision Making in the European Community


Scholarship on the European Community (EC) focuses particular attention on how formal voting rules and institutional reform condition decision-making outcomes. The predominant view of EC history holds that decision making remained paralyzed until institutional reforms in 1987 and 1992 restored and expanded adherence to majority voting rules, which in turn unblocked and expedited EC legislative efforts. In this study I challenge these fundamental assumptions using comprehensive data for 1974–95 and a series of quantitative assessments, including event history analysis. I show that decision making in the 1970s was anything but paralyzed, that the impact of the Luxembourg Compromise has been greatly overstated, that institutional reforms actually encumbered rather than eased the EC legislative process, and that institutional effects are mediated by the underlying distribution of member state preferences. The findings have important implications for our understanding of the history and future trajectory of European integration and highlight the applicability of standard political science theories and methods to the study of the EC.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *