Skip to main content
×
×
Home

International Negotiations in the Shadow of National Elections

  • Stephanie J. Rickard and Teri L. Caraway
Abstract

This study examines the role elections play in negotiations between states and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Although loans made by the IMF often require countries to introduce painful austerity measures that provoke a backlash from angry citizens, some governments are able to negotiate more favorable terms than others. Original data on the substantive content of IMF loans show that governments leverage imminent elections to obtain more lenient loan terms. Conditions that require labor market reforms in exchange for IMF financing are relatively less stringent in loans negotiated within six months before a pending democratic election, all else equal. The further away elections are from loan negotiations, the more stringent the labor conditions included in countries’ loan programs. Elections give governments leverage in their international negotiations and this leverage is effective even when states negotiate with unelected bureaucrats during times of economic crisis.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anner, Mark, and Caraway, Teri L.. 2010. International Institutions and Workers’ Rights: Between Labor Standards and Market Flexibility. Studies in Comparative International Development 45 (2):151–69.
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bienen, Henry S., and Gersovitz, Mark. 1985. Economic Stabilization, Conditionality, and Political Stability. International Organization 39 (4):729–54.
Bird, Graham. 1996. Borrowing from the IMF: The Policy Implications of Recent Empirical Research. World Development 24 (11):1753–60.
Caraway, Teri L., Rickard, Stephanie J., and Anner, Mark. 2012. International Negotiations and Domestic Politics: The Case of IMF Labor Market Conditionality. International Organization 66 (1):2761.
Conconi, Paola, Facchini, Giovanni, and Zanardi, Maurizio. 2012. Policymakers’ Horizon and Trade Reform. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8561. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Copelovitch, Mark S. 2010. The International Monetary Fund in the Global Economy: Banks, Bonds, and Bailouts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, Christina L. 2012. Why Adjudicate? Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65 (2):135–50.
Dreher, Axel. 2003. The Influence of Elections on IMF Program Interruptions. Journal of Development Studies 39 (6):101–20.
Dreher, Axel, and Gassebner, Martin. 2012. Do IMF and World Bank Programs Induce Government Crises? An Empirical Analysis. International Organization 66 (2):329–58.
Dreher, Axel, and Jensen, Nathan M.. 2007. Independent Actor or Agent? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of US Interests on International Monetary Fund Conditions. Journal of Law and Economics 50 (1):105–24.
Gould, Erica. 2006. Money Talks: The International Monetary Fund, Conditionality, and Supplementary Financiers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Greenhill, Brian, Mosley, Layna, and Prakash, Aseem. 2009. Trade-Based Diffusion of Labor Rights: A Panel Study, 1986–2002. American Political Science Review 103 (4):669–90.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie. 2009. Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hillman, John R. 1980. The Mutual Influence of Italian Domestic Politics and the International Monetary Fund. Fletcher Forum 4 (1):133.
Hyde, Susan D., and Marinov, Nikolay. 2012. Which Elections Can Be Lost? Political Analysis 20 (2):191210.
Kahler, Miles. 1993. Bargaining with the IMF: Two-Level Strategies and Developing Countries. In Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, edited by Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert D., 363–94. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kim, Moonhawk. 2012. Ex Ante Due Diligence: Formation of PTAs and Protection of Labor Rights. International Studies Quarterly 56 (4):704–19.
Kono, Daniel Y. 2006. Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency. American Political Science Review 100 (3):369–84.
Kono, Daniel Y. 2008. Democracy and Trade Discrimination. Journal of Politics 70 (4):942–55.
Leblang, David A. 2002. The Political Economy of Speculative Attacks in the Developing World. International Studies Quarterly 46 (1):6991.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3:183219.
Mayer, Wolfgang. 1984. Endogenous Tariff Formation. American Economic Review 74 (5):970–85.
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1997. Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations: Elections and Divided Government as Constraints on Trade Liberalization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):117–46.
Moser, Christoph, and Sturm, Jan-Egbert. 2011. Explaining IMF Lending Decisions After the Cold War. Review of International Organizations 6 (3–4):307–40.
Mosley, Layna. 2011. Labor Rights and Multinational Production. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2009. From Economic Crisis to Reform: IMF Programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2000. The Effect of IMF Programs on Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics 62 (2):385421.
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.
Rickard, Stephanie J., and Caraway, Teri L.. 2014. The International Politics of Austerity: The Puzzling Case of Public Sector Reforms. Paper presented at the seventh Annual Conference on the Political Economy of International Organization. 16-18 Jaunary, Princeton.
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Steinwand, Martin C., and Stone, Randall W.. 2008. The International Monetary Fund: A Review of the Recent Evidence. Review of International Organization 3 (2):123–49.
Stone, Randall W. 2002. Lending Credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the Post-Communist Transition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stone, Randall W. 2004. The Political Economy of IMF Lending in Africa. American Political Science Review 98 (4):577–91.
Stone, Randall W. 2008. The Scope of IMF Conditionality. International Organization 62 (4):589620.
Stone, Randall W. 2011. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thacker, Strom. 1999. The High Politics of IMF Lending. World Politics 52 (1):3875.
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, Randall W. 2007. The International Monetary Fund: Politics of Conditional Lending. New York: Routledge.
Weingast, Barry, Shepsle, Kenneth, and Johnsen, Christopher. 1981. The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4):642–64.
Wolfensohn, James. 2013. “Reflections on a Changing World: 1950–2050.” Public lecture delivered at the London School of Economics, London, 29 May.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed