Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 68
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred 2016. Why do some international institutions contain strong dispute settlement provisions? New evidence from preferential trade agreements. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 89.

    Chaudoin, Stephen Kucik, Jeffrey and Pelc, Krzysztof 2016. Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 294.

    Schmeier, Susanne Gerlak, Andrea K. and Blumstein, Sabine 2016. Clearing the muddy waters of shared watercourses governance: conceptualizing international River Basin Organizations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 597.

    Ásgeirsdóttir, Áslaug and Steinwand, Martin 2015. Dispute settlement mechanisms and maritime boundary settlements. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 119.

    Betz, Timm and Kerner, Andrew 2015. The influence of interest: Real US interest rates and bilateral investment treaties. The Review of International Organizations,

    Blake, Daniel J. and Payton, Autumn Lockwood 2015. Balancing design objectives: Analyzing new data on voting rules in intergovernmental organizations. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 377.

    Dai, X. 2015. Who defines the rules of the game in East Asia? The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the strategic use of international institutions. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Krajewska, Atina 2015. Bioethics and Human Rights in the Constitutional Formation of Global Health. Laws, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, p. 771.

    Medina de Souza, Igor Abdalla 2015. An offer developing countries could not refuse: how powerful states created the World Trade Organisation. Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 155.

    Rossi, Christopher R. 2015. The club within the club: the challenge of a soft law framework in a global Arctic context. The Polar Journal, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 8.

    Westerwinter, Oliver 2015. Joost Pauwelyn, Ramses A. Wessel and Jan Wouters (Eds.). 2012. Informal international lawmaking. (Oxford: Oxford University Press). The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Aalberts, Tanja E and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas 2014. Sovereignty at sea: the law and politics of saving lives in mare liberum. Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 439.

    Baccini, Leonardo and Urpelainen, Johannes 2014. Before Ratification: Understanding the Timing of International Treaty Effects on Domestic Policies. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58, Issue. 1, p. 29.

    DELIMATSIS, PANAGIOTIS 2014. Transparency in the WTO's Decision-Making. Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 27, Issue. 03, p. 701.

    Newman, Abraham and Bach, David 2014. The European Union as hardening agent: soft law and the diffusion of global financial regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 430.

    Sattler, Thomas Spilker, Gabriele and Bernauer, Thomas 2014. Does WTO Dispute Settlement Enforce or Inform?. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, Issue. 04, p. 877.

    2014. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. xv, 680. Index. $125, cloth; $44.99, paper.. The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 108, Issue. 3, p. 597.

    Blake, Daniel J. 2013. Thinking Ahead: Government Time Horizons and the Legalization of International Investment Agreements. International Organization, Vol. 67, Issue. 04, p. 797.

    Brake, Benjamin and Katzenstein, Peter J. 2013. Lost in Translation? Nonstate Actors and the Transnational Movement of Procedural Law. International Organization, Vol. 67, Issue. 04, p. 725.

    De Bièvre, Dirk Poletti, Arlo and Thomann, Lars 2013. To enforce or not to enforce? Judicialization, venue shopping, and global regulatory harmonization. Regulation & Governance, p. n/a.


Introduction: Legalization and World Politics


In many issue-areas, the world is witnessing a move to law. As the century turned, governments and individuals faced the following international legal actions. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Britain's ban on homosexuals in the armed forces violates the right to privacy, contravening Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia indicted Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic during a NATO bombing campaign to force Yugoslav forces out of Kosovo. Milosevic remains in place in Belgrade, but Austrian police, bearing a secret indictment from the International Criminal Tribunal, arrested a Bosnian Serb general who was attending a conference in Vienna. In economic affairs the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body found in favor of the United States and against the European Union (EU) regarding European discrimination against certain Latin American banana exporters. A U.S. district court upheld the constitutionality of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) against claims that its dispute-resolution provisions violated U. S. sovereignty. In a notable environmental judgment, the new Law of the Sea Tribunal ordered the Japanese to cease all fishing for southern bluefin tuna for the rest of the year.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *