Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Liberal Social Reconstruction and the Resolution of Civil Wars in Central America


The international community, in its efforts to overcome the security dilemmas that inhibit conflict resolution, need not always offer forceful security guarantees to combatants in civil wars. We argue that noncoercive, liberal international intervention can end civil wars. As suggested by a constructivist perspective and the insights of the democratic peace, the promotion of liberal democracy can successfully resolve civil wars by transforming the identities and institutions of the combatants. We develop this argument by examining the resolution of civil wars in Central America during the 1990s. Of the Central American cases, Nicaragua, the country subject to the strongest security guarantees, has been the least stable of the three. El Salvador and Guatemala, in contrast, have experienced more successful conflict resolution despite the lack of any forceful security guarantees by the international community. The termination of these civil wars can be best explained by the adherence of local actors to liberal democratic norms and institutions in response to a variety of international pressures and opportunities.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Michael Barnett . 1997. Bringing in the New World Order: Liberalism, Legitimacy, and the United Nations. World Politics 49 (4):526–51.

Michelle Benson , and Jacek Kugler . 1998. Power Parity, Democracy, and the Severity of Internal Violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (2):196209.

Martha Finnemore , and Kathryn Sikkink . 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 52 (4):887918.

Kurt Taylor Gaubatz 1991. Election Cycles and War. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 35 (2):212–44.

Robert Jervis . 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics. 30 (2):186214.

David A. Lake 1992. Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War. American Political Science Review 86 (l):2437.

Andrew Moravscik . 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization. 51 (4):513–54.

T. Clifton Morgan , and Sally Campbell . 1991. Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War: So Why Kant Democracies Fight? Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):187211.

John Oneal , and Bruce Russett . 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly. 41 (2):267–94.

Roland Paris . 1997. Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism. International Security. 22 (2):5489.

Richard Price . 1998. Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization. 52 (3):613–44.

William I. Robinson 1996. Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, U.S. Intervention, and Hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John Gerard Ruggie . 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neoutilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4):855–86.

William Stanley . 1999. Building New Police Forces in El Salvador and Guatemala: Learning and Counter-learning. International Peacekeeping 6 (4): 113–14.

William Stanley , and David Holiday . 1997. Peace Mission Strategy and Domestic Actors: United Nations Mediation, Verification, and Institution Building in El Salvador. International Peacekeeping 4 (2):2249.

Stephen John Stedman . 1997. Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes. International Security. 22 (2):553.

Barbara F. Walter 1997. The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement. International Organization. 51 (3): 335–64.

Barbara F. Walter 1999. Designing Transitions from Civil War: Demobilization, Democratization, and Commitments to Peace. International Security. 24 (1):127–55.

Alexander Wendt . 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88 (2):384–96.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 44 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 172 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.