Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T19:02:03.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lost hegemony?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Helen Milner
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor at the Institute on Western Europe, Columbia University, New York City.
Jack Snyder
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Political Science at Columbia University, New York City.
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See, for example, the charts and discussion in Cohen, Stephen S. and Zysman, John, Manufacturing Matters (New York: Basic Books, 1987), chap. 5Google Scholar, and Scott, Bruce R. and Lodge, George C., U. S. Competitiveness in the World Economy (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1985)Google Scholar. Professor Strange cites Shelp, Ronald, Beyond Industrialization (New York: Praeger, 1981) as the source for her statement (p. 567)Google Scholar that “American service industries will hold their share—50 percent or more—of the whole world market,” but in fact Shelp's tables on pp. 24–25 show the U. S. share of world “invisible” trade as 19. 7 percent and declining, as of the 1978 end-point of his data.

2. Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Random, 1987), p. 525Google Scholar.

3. Russett, Bruce, “The Mysterious Case of Vanishing Hegemony; or, Is Mark Twain Really Dead?International Organization 39 (Spring 1985), pp. 207–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. We have not been able to verify Reich's figure, however, since his source could not be located with the information in his footnote.