Skip to main content

The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights

  • Erik Voeten (a1)

Theories of government–international court relations assume that judges share an interest in expanding the reach of their court. Yet, casual observation suggests that international judges vary in their activist orientations and that governments selectively appoint judges. This article explores a new data set of dissents in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to estimate the ideal points of judges. The results show that activism-restraint is indeed the main dimension of contestation among judges. Variation in judicial activism cannot be accounted for by different legal cultures of judges or by levels of domestic human rights observance in the judges' countries of origins. Instead, aspiring European Union (EU) members and governments more favorably disposed toward European integration appoint more activist judges. These results imply that politics matters in the appointment of international judges and that EU expansion was an important driving force behind the ECHR's increased activism. More generally, the analysis suggests that agent selection is an important and understudied tool for influencing international organizations.Earlier versions of this article were presented at seminars at the University of Chicago, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, George Washington, the University of Wisconsin, William and Mary, Princeton, and Georgetown as well as the 2006 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. I much appreciate comments and suggestions from the participants in those seminars, two anonymous referees, Karen Alter, Freek Bruinsma, Rachel Cichowski, Allison Danner, Darren Hawkins, Larry Helfer, Christopher Joyner, Charles Lipson, Emily Meierding, Andrew Moravcsik, Kimberly Morgan, Eric Posner, Mike Tierney, and Andreas von Staden. I thank Jamie Druckman, Andrew Roberts, and Paul Warwick for making data on cabinet composition available.

Hide All


Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Duncan Snidal. 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):40119.
Alivizatos, Nicos. 1995. Judges as Veto Players. In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, edited by Herbert Döring, 56689. New York: St. Martin's.
Alter, Karen J. 1998. Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty”? European Governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52 (1):12147.
Alter, Karen J. 2006. Delegation to International Courts and the Limits of Re-Contracting Political Power. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Darren G. Hawkins, David A. Lake, Daniel L. Neilson, and Michael J. Tierney, 31238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alter, Karen J. Forthcoming. Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context. European Journal of International Relations.
Armingeon, Klaus, and Romana Careja. 2004. Comparative Data Set for 28 Post Communist Countries, 1989–2004. Berne, Switzerland: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
Armingeon, Klaus, Phillip Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegale. 2005. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2003. Berne, Switzerland: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
Arnold, Nina-Louisa. 2001. Do Germ-Cells of a Global Human Rights Culture Exist? A Case Study of the Inner Legal Culture of the European Court of Human Rights. Master's thesis, Stanford University Law School, Calif.
Bafumi, Joseph, Andrew Gelman, David K. Park, and Noah Kaplan. 2005. Practical Issues in Implementing and Understanding Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation. Political Analysis 13 (2):17187.
Bailey, Michael A. 2006. Bridging Institutions and Time: Creating Comparable Preference Estimates for Presidents, Senators, and Justices, 1946–2002. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Bailey, Michael A., Brian Kamoie, and Forrest Maltzman. 2005. Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 49 (1):7285.
Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):16576.
Blackburn, Robert, and Jörg Polakiewicz, eds. 2001. Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and its Member States, 1950–2000. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Broude, Tomer. 2004. International Governance in the WTO: Judicial Boundaries and Political Capitulation. London: Cameron May.
Bruinsma, Fred J. 2004. De rechtersverkiezingen voor het EHRM van 2004. NJCM-Bulletin 29 (7):87082.
Bruinsma, Fred J. 2006. Judicial Identities in the European Court of Human Rights. In Multilevel Governance in Enforcement and Adjudication, edited by Aukje van Hoek, A. M. Hol, O. Jansen, P. Rijpkema, and R. Widdershoven, 20340. Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.
Bruinsma, Fred J., and Matthijs de Blois. 1997. Rules of Law from Westport to Wladiwostok: Separate Opinions in the European Court of Human Rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 15 (2):17586.
Bruinsma, Fred J., and S. Parmentier. 2003. Interview with Mr. Luzius Wildhaber, President of the ECHR. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 21 (2):185201.
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (1):4176.
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2002. The European Court of Justice, Democracy, and Enlargement. European Union Politics 4 (1):75100.
Cassese, Antonio. 2005. International Law. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2006. Courts, Rights, and Democratic Participation. Comparative Political Studies 39 (1):5075.
Costa, Olivier. 2003. The European Court of Justice and Democratic Control in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (5):74061.
Danner, Allison Marston. 2006. When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War. Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (1):165.
Department of Constitutional Affairs, United Kingdom. 2006. Voting Rights of Convicted Prisoners Detained within the United Kingdom: The UK Government's Response to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights judgment in the case of Hirst v. The United Kingdom. Available at 〈〉. Accessed 12 June 2007.
Druckman, James N., and Andrew Roberts. 2005. Context and Coalition-Bargaining: Comparing Portfolio Allocation in Eastern and Western Europe. Party Politics 11 (5):53555.
Druckman, James N., and Paul V. Warwick. 2005. The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western European Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 44 (1):1742.
Fearon, James D. 1999. Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance. In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, 5597. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flauss, Jean-François. 1998. Radioscopie de l'élection de la nouvelle Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. Revue Trimestrielle des droits de l'homme 9 (35):43564.
Gabel, Matthew. 1998. Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories. Journal of Politics 60 (2):33354.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 49 (1):17181.
Garrett, Geoffrey, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Heiner Schulz. 1998. The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 52 (1):14976.
Glaeser, Edward L., and Andrei Shleifer. 2002. Legal Origins. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4):1193229.
Hawkins, Darren G., David A. Lake, Daniel L. Neilson, and Michael J. Tierney, eds. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helfer, Laurence R., and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 1997. Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication. Yale Law Journal 107 (2):273391.
Helfer, Laurence R., and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2005. Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo. California Law Review 93 (3):90156.
Hix, Simon, Abdul G. Noury, and Gérard Roland. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson. 2002. Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? Comparative Political Studies 35 (8):96589.
Jackman, Simon. 2000. Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation: Identification, Estimation, Inference, and Model Checking. Political Analysis 9 (3):22741.
Jackson, Donald W. 1997. The United Kingdom Confronts the European Convention on Human Rights. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2001. The Limits of Judicial Power: Trade-Environment Disputes in the GATT/WTO and the EU. Comparative Political Studies 34 (6):62250.
Kelley, Judith. 2004. International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization 58 (3):42557.
Keohane, Robert O., Andrew Moravcsik, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2000. Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational. International Organization 54 (3):45788.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio López-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106 (6):111355.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio López-de-Silanes, Cristian Pop-Eleches, and Andrei Shleifer. 2004. Judicial Checks and Balances. Journal of Political Economy 112 (2):44570.
Limbach, Jutta, Pedro Cruz Villalón, Roger Errera, The Rt. Hon. Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC, Tamara Morshchakova, The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Sedley, and Andrzej Zoll. 2003. Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights. London: International Centre for the Legal Protection of Human Rights.
Loucaides, Loukis G. 1995. Essays on the Developing Law of Human Rights. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Loucaides, Loukis G. 2003. Questions of Fair Trial Under the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 3 (1):2751.
Loucaides, Loukis G. 2004. The Protection of the Right to Property in Occupied Territories. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53 (3):67790.
Magalhães, Pedro C. 1998. Judicial Behavior in Constitutional Courts: The Case of Portugal. Paper presented at the Annual Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, October, East Lansing, Mich.
Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Moira Nelson, and Erica Edwards. 2006. Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality. Comparative Political Studies 39 (2):15575.
Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2002. Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis 10 (2):13453.
Matscher, F. 1993. Methods of Interpretation of the Convention. In The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, edited by R. McDonald, F. Matscher, and H. Petzold, 6381. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
McLaren, Lauren M. 2002. Public Support for the European Union: Cost/Benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat? Journal of Politics 64 (2):55166.
Merills, J. G. 1988. The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Merryman, John Henry. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. 2d ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origin of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2):21752.
Morrisson, Clovis C. 1981. The Dynamics of Development in the European Human Rights Convention System. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mowbray, Alastair. 2005. The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 5 (1):5779.
Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Posner, Eric A., and Miguel de Figueiredo. 2005. Is the International Court of Justice Biased? American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings Paper 36.
Posner, Eric A., and John C. Yoo. 2005. Judicial Independence in International Tribunals. California Law Review 93 (1):174.
Ray, Leonard. 1999. Measuring Party Orientations Towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey. The European Journal of Political Research 36 (2):283306.
Rivière, Florence. 2004. Les Opinions Séparées des Juges à la Cour Européenne des Droits de l'Homme. Brussels, Belgium: Brylant.
Rowland, C.K., and Bridget Jeffery Todd. 1991. Where You Stand Depends on Who Sits: Platform Promises and Judicial Gatekeeping in the Federal District Courts. The Journal of Politics 53 (1):17585.
Schermers, Henry G. 1998. Election of Judges to the European Court of Human Rights. European Law Review 23 (6):56878.
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):4780.
Schwartz, Herman. 1993. The New East European Constitutional Courts. In Constitution Making in Eastern Europe, edited by A. E. Dick Howard, 163207. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Shapiro, Martin M., and Alec Stone. 1994. The New Constitutional Politics of Europe. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4):397420.
Shapiro, Martin M., and Alec Stone Sweet. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Songer, Donald R., and Martha Humphries Ginn. 2002. Assessing the Impact of Presidential and Home State Influences on Judicial Decisionmaking in the United States Courts of Appeals. Political Research Quarterly 55 (2):299328.
Steinberg, Richard H. 2004. Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints. American Journal of International Law 98 (2):24775.
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stone Sweet, Alec., and Thomas L. Brunell. 1998. Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community. American Political Science Review 92 (1):6381.
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Wayne Sandholtz, eds. 1998. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Voeten, Erik. 2000. Clashes in the Assembly. International Organization 54 (2):185215.
Voeten, Erik. 2004. Resisting the Lonely Superpower: Responses of States in the United Nations to U.S. Dominance. Journal of Politics 66 (3):72954.
Voeten, Erik. 2006. The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. Paper presented at the 1st Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, October, Austin, Texas.
Voigt, Stefan. 2006. The Interplay between National and International Law–Its Economic Effects Drawing on Four New Indicators. Available at: 〈〉. Accessed 12 June 2007.
Von Brünneck, Alexander. 1988. Constitutional Review and Legislation in Western Democracies. In Constitutional Review and Legislation: An International Comparison, edited by Christine Landfried, 22164. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Yourow, Howard Charles. 1996. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Zaring, David. 2006. The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 3 (2):297331.
Zorn, Cristopher, and Steven R. Van Winkle. 2001. Government Responses to the European Court of Human Rights. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Effects of and Responses to Globalization, May, Istanbul, Turkey.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 170 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 920 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.