Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:16:14.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeing women, recognizing gender, recasting international relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Craig N. Murphy
Craig N. Murphy
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science at Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Eassys
Information
International Organization , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , Summar 1996 , pp. 513 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdo, Nahla. 1993. Middle east politics through feminist lenses: Negotiating the terms of solidarity. Alternatives 18:29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Peter R., and D'Amico, Francine. 1994. Women, gender, and world politics: Perspectives, policies, and prospects. Westport, Conn.: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Black, Naomi, and Cottrel, Ann Baker, eds. 1981. Women and world change: Equity issues in development. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Boserup, Esther. 1986. Women's role in economic development. Aldershot, England: Gower.Google Scholar
Boulding, Elise. 1980. Women, the fifth world. New York: Foreign Policy Association.Google Scholar
Brock-Utne, Birgit. 1985. Educating for peace: A feminist perspective. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Brown, Sarah. 1988. Feminism, international theory, and international relations of gender inequality. Millennium 17:461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunster, Ximena, and the Wellesley Editorial Committee. 1977. Women and national development: The complexities of change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Berenice. 1972. Peace research: The cult of power. Journal of Conflict Resolution 16:585–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, , M., Sue Ellen, Everett, Jana, and Staudt, Kathleen, eds. 1989. Women, the state, and development. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1990. Clean bombs and clean language. In Elshtain, and Tobias, . 1990.Google Scholar
Converse, Elizabeth. 1972. A posteditorial. Journal of Conflict Resolution 16:617–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Alice, and Kirk, Gwyn. 1983. Greenham women everywhere: Dreams, ideas, and actions from the women's peace movement. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Curie, Adam. 1971. Makingpeace. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Francine, D'Amico, and Beckman, Peter R., eds. 1994. Women in world politics: An introduction. Westport, Conn.: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter. 1994. Introduction to Mary Parker Follett-prophet of management: A celebration of writings from the 1920s. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1987. Women and war. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1990. The problem with peace. In Elshtain and Tobias. 1990.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, and Tobias, Shelia. 1990. Women, militarism, and war: Essays in politics, history, and social theory, Savage, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1990. Bananas, beaches, and bases: Making feminist sense of international relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993. The morning after: Sexual politics at the end of the cold war. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fiedler, Soja. 1993. Special issue: And the walls came tumbling down? A feminist view from East Berlin. Alternatives 18:97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker. 1918. The new state. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Stephen, Gill, ed. 1993. Gramsci, historical materialism, and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giordano, Eric, and Silver, Kimberly. 1993. Special issue: Gender in international relations: Evolving perspectives. Fletcher Forum 17:1–131.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua. 1994. International Relations. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Grant, Rebecca, and Long, David, eds. 1988. Special issue: Women and international relations. Millennium 17:419–537.Google Scholar
Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen, eds. 1991. Gender and international relations. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 1987. State and society in international relations: A second agenda. Millennium 16:215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 1991. Hidden from international relations: Women and the international arena. In Grant and Newland 1991.Google Scholar
Harrington, Mona. 1992. What exactly is wrong with the liberal state as an agent pf change? In Gendered states: Feminist. Revisions of international relations theory, edited by Peterson, V. Spike. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1988. International politics: A framework for analysis. 5th ed.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J.. 1991. Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order, 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, Perdita. 1979. Third world women speak out: Interviews in six countries on change, development, and basic needs. New York: Praeger for the Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-states: Sovereignty, international relations, and the third world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jahan, Rounaq, and Papanek, Hanna, eds. 1979. Women and development: Perspectives from South and Southeast Asia. Dacca: Bangladesh Institute of Law and International Affairs.Google Scholar
Janeway, Elizabeth. 1980. Powers of the weak. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kao, Chihwa, Hall, H. Keith, and Nelson, Douglas R.. 1994. omen and tariffs: Testing the gender-gap hypothesis in a Downs-Mayer political economy model. Working paper, Murphy Institute of Political Economy, Tulane University, New Orleans, La.Google Scholar
Kegley, Charles W. Jr, and Wittkopf, Eugene R.. 1993. World politics: Trend and transformation. 4th ed.New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Gender and science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C. 1979. An interaction approach to conflict resolution and its application to Israeli-Palestinian relations. International Interactions 6:99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1991. International relations theory: Contributions of a feminist standpoint. In Grant and Newland. 1991.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1993. Preparing for the twenty-first century. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Keyman, Fuat. 1995. Articulating difference: The problem of the other in international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 2:70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1988. Sovereignty: An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies 21:66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, David. 1991. J. A. Hobson and idealism in international relations. Review of International Studies 17:285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1978. The critical theory of Jiirgen Habermas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGlen, Nancy, and Sarkees, Meredith Reid. 1993. Women in foreign policy: The insiders. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mclntosh, Peggy. 1983. Interactive phases of curricular re-vision: A feminist perspective. Wellesley, Mass.: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Henry, and Urwick, L.. 1942. Introduction to Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1986. Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labor. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Miller, Carol. 1991. Women in international relations? The debate in interwar Britain. In Gender and international relations, edited by Grant, Rebecca and Newland, Kathleen. Bloomington, Ind.: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Millett, Kate. 1970. Sexual politics. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1973. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. 5th ed.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig N. 1994. International organization and industrial change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig N., and Tooze, Roger. 1991. Getting beyond the “common sense” of the IPE orthodoxy. In The new international political economy, edited by Murphy, Craig N. and Tooze, Roger. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Newland, Kathleen. 1991. From transnational relationships to international relations: Women in development and the international decade for women. In Grant and Newland. 1991.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Mary. 1981. The politics of reproduction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Overbeek, Henk, ed. 1993. Restructuring hegemony in the global political economy: The rise of transnational neo-liberalism in the 1980s. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, Patricia Ann. 1995. In Adamless Eden: The community of women faculty at Wellesley. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Papart, Jane, and Staudt, Kathleen, eds. 1989. Women and the state in Africa. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, ed. 1992. Gendered states: Feminist (revisions of international relations theory. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, ed. 1993. The politics of identity in international relations. Fletcher Forum 17:1–10.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, and Runyan, Anne Sisson. 1993. Global gender issues: Dilemmas in world politics. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Randall, Mercedes M., ed. 1964. Improper Bostonian: Emily Greene Batch, Nobel peace laureate, 1946. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1960. Fights, games, and debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Reardon, Betty. 1985. Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers College Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Richards, Janet Radcliffe. 1990. Why the pursuit of peace is no part of feminism. In Elshtain and Tobias. 1990.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1990. The Origins of American social science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, Sarah. 1990. The rationality of care. In Elshtain and Tobias. 1990.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1983. The prisoners of insecurity: Nuclear deterrence, the arms race, and arms control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Starr, Harvey. 1989. World politics: The menu for choice. 3d ed.New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sharoni, Simona. 1993. Middle East politics through feminist lenses: Toward theorizing international relations from women's struggles. Alternatives 18:5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David. 1985. The responsibilities of competence in the global village. International Studies Quarterly 29:245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks. 1989. Arms and the enlisted woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1995. ISA as a microcosm. International Studies Quarterly.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, Amy. 1990. Motherhood and the subversion of the military state: Women Strike for Peace confronts the House Committee on Un-American Activities. In Elshtain and Tobias 1990.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine, ed. 1993. Special issue: Feminists write international relations. Alternatives 18:1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester, Christine, ed. 1994. Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tetreault, Mary Ann. 1993. Women and revolution: A framework for analysis. In Gendered states-Feminist: Re visions of international relations theory, edited by Peterson, V. Spike. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Tetreault, Mary Ann, ed. 1994. Women and revolution in Africa, Asia, and the new world. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1991. Hans Morgenthau's principles of political realism: A feminist reformulation. In Grant and Newland. 1990.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in international relations: Feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tobias, Shelia. 1990. Shifting heroisms: The uses of military service in politics. In Elshtain and Tobias. 1990.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. [1898] 1969. Why economics is not an evolutionary science. In On Marx, race, science, and ideology. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Were, Gideon S. 1985. Women and development in Africa. Nairobi: G. S. Were Press.Google Scholar
Whitworth, Sandra. 1989. Gender in the inter-paradigm debate. Millennium 18:265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, Sandra. 1994. Feminism and international relations. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarbrough, Beth V., and Yarbrough, Robert M.. 1992. Cooperation and governance in international trade: The strategic organizational approach. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1993. Feminist standpoint theory meets international relations theory: A feminist version of David and Goliath? Fletcher Forum 17:13–32.Google Scholar