Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Spatial Effects in Dyadic Data

  • Eric Neumayer (a1) and Thomas Plümper (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Political units often spatially depend in their policy choices on other units. This also holds in dyadic settings where, as in much of international relations research, analysis focuses on the interaction or relation between a pair or dyad of two political units. Yet, with few exceptions, social scientists have analyzed contagion in monadic datasets only, consisting of individual political units. This article categorizes all possible forms of spatial effect modeling in both undirected and directed dyadic data, where it is possible to distinguish the source and the target of interaction (for example, exporter/importer, aggressor/victim, and so on). This approach enables scholars to formulate and test novel mechanisms of contagion, thus ideally paving the way for studies analyzing spatial dependence between dyads of political units. To illustrate the modeling flexibility gained from an understanding of the full set of specification options for spatial effects in dyadic data, we examine the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties between developed and developing countries, building and extending on Elkins, Guzman, and Simmons's 2006 study. However, we come to different conclusions about the channels through which bilateral investment treaties diffuse. Rather than a capital-importing country being influenced by the total number of BITs signed by other capital importers, as modeled in their original article, we find that a capital-importing country is more likely to sign a BIT with a capital exporter only if other competing capital importers have signed BITs with this very same capital exporter. Similarly, other capital exporters' BITs with a specific capital importer influence an exporter's incentive to agree on a BIT with the very same capital importer.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anselin Luc. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Anselin Luc. 2003. Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers, and Spatial Econometrics. International Regional Science Review 26 (2):153–66.
Basinger Scott, and Hallerberg Mark. 2004. Remodeling the Competition for Capital: How Domestic Politics Erases the Race to the Bottom. American Political Science Review 98 (2):261–76.
Beck Nathaniel, Gleditsch Kristian Skrede, and Beardsley Kyle. 2006. Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1):2744.
Beck Nathaniel, and Katz Jonathan N.. 1996. Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis 6 (1):136.
Brooks Sarah M. 2007. When Does Diffusion Matter? Explaining the Spread of Structural Pension Reforms Across Nations. Journal of Politics 69 (3):701–15.
Cho Wendy K. Tam. 2003. Contagion Effects and Ethnic Contribution Networks. American Journal of Political Science 47 (2):368–87.
Elkins Zachary, Guzman Andrew T., and Simmons Beth A.. 2006. Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization 60 (4):811–46.
Elkins Zachary, and Simmons Beth A.. 2005. On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1):3351.
Franzese Robert J. Jr., and Hays Jude C.. 2006. Strategic Interaction Among EU Governments in Active Labor Market Policy-Making: Subsidiarity and Policy Coordination under the European Employment Strategy. European Union Politics 7 (2):167–89.
Franzese Robert J. Jr., and Hays Jude C.. 2007. Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data. Political Analysis 15 (2):140–64.
Franzese Robert, and Hays Jude C.. 2008. Spatial Econometric Models of Interdependence. Book prospectus.
Gartzke Erik, and Gleditsch Kristian S.. 2006. Identity and Conflict: Ties that Bind and Differences that Divide. European Journal of International Relations 12 (1):5387.
Gartzke Erik, Li Quan, and Boehmer Charles. 2001. Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict. International Organization 55 (2):391438.
Genschel Philipp, and Plümper Thomas. 1997. Regulatory Competition and International Cooperation. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (4):626–42.
Gleditsch Kristian S., and Ward Michael D.. 2006. The Diffusion of Democracy and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization 60 (4):911–33.
Guzman Andrew T. 1998. Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Virginia Journal of International Law 38:639–88.
Hallerberg Mark, and Basinger Scott. 1998. Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries: The Importance of Domestic Veto Players. Comparative Political Studies 31 (3):321–53.
Jahn Detlev. 2006. Globalization as “Galton's Problem”: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development. International Organization 60 (2):401–31.
King Gary. 2001. Proper Nouns and Methodological Propriety: Pooling Dyads in International Relations Data. International Organization 55 (2):497507.
Levi-Faur David. 2005. The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1):1232.
Manger Mark S. 2006. The Political Economy of Discrimination: Modelling the Spread of Preferential Trade Agreements. Working Paper. Montréal, Canada: Department of Political Science, McGill University.
Meseguer Covadonga. 2005. Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1):6782.
Mooney Christopher Z. 2001. Modelling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion. Political Research Quarterly 54 (1):103–24.
Murdoch James C., and Sandler Todd. 2004. Civil Wars and Economic Growth: Spatial Dispersion. American Journal of Political Science 48 (1):138–51.
Neumayer Eric. 2006. Self-Interest, Foreign Need and Good Governance: Are Bilateral Investment Treaty Programs Similar to Aid Allocation? Foreign Policy Analysis 2 (3):245–67.
Neumayer Eric, and Spess Laura. 2005. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries? World Development 33 (10):1567–85.
Plümper Thomas, and Neumayer Eric. Forthcoming.Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence. European Journal of Political Research.
Plümper Thomas, Troeger Vera E., and Manow Philip. 2005. Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics. Linking Method to Theory. European Journal of Political Research 44 (2):327–54.
Porojan A. 2001. Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited. Open Economies Review 12 (3):265–80.
Russett Bruce, Oneal John R., and Davis David R.. 1998. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–1985. International Organization 52 (3):441–67.
Salehyan Idean, and Gleditsch Kristian Skrede. 2006. Refugees and the Spread of Civil War. International Organization 60 (2):335–66.
Simmons Beth A., Dobbin Frank, and Garrett Geoffrey. 2006. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60 (4):781810.
Simmons Beth A., and Elkins Zachary. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1):171–89.
Swank Duane. 2006. Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism. International Organization 60 (4):847–82.
Ward Michael D., and Gleditsch Kristian. 2002. Location, Location, Location: An MCMC Approach to Modeling the Spatial Context of War and Peace. Political Analysis 10 (3):244–60.
Ward Michael D., and Gleditsch Kristian. 2008. Spatial Regression Models. London: Sage.
Weyland Kurt. 2005. Theories of Political Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform. World Politics 57 (2):262–95.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 102 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 346 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.