Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Unequal Ground: Homelands and Conflict


Although there is a deep and wide consensus that international conflict over territory is especially common and destructive, there is less agreement over what it is about territory that leads to these outcomes. Understanding the role of territory in international conflict requires complementing realist and materialist understandings of the value of territory with one grounded in the constructivist theories that dominate studies of nationalism and geography. Doing so recognizes that homeland territoriality, because it raises the value of a specific territory and provides an imperative to establish sovereignty over it, plays a distinctive role in driving international conflict. This article presents a systematic, replicable operationalization of the homeland status of territory that, because it is consistent with constructivist theories of nationalism, can be used to integrate constructivist understandings of the role of territory into quantitative studies of territorial conflict. This measure is then used to test the implication that the loss of subjectively defined homeland territory increases the likelihood of international conflict relative to the loss of nonhomeland territory. The findings that dividing homelands is especially likely to lead to conflict are corroborated by a second novel measure of the homeland status of territory that is based on the identification of co-ethnics in a territory before the border was drawn.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

John Agnew . 1994. The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1):5380.

John Agnew . 2007. No Borders, No Nations: Making Greece in Macedonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97 (2):398422.

Rogers Brubaker . 2009. Ethnicity Race, and Nationalism. Annual Review of Sociology 35:2142.

Andrew F. Burghardt 1973. The Bases of Territorial Claims. Geographical Review 63 (2):225–45.

Allan Dafoe , John R. Oneal , and Bruce Russett . 2013. The Democratic Peace: Weighing the Evidence and Cautious Inference. International Studies Quarterly 57 (1):201–14.

Alexander B. Downes 2001. The Holy Land Divided: Defending Partition as a Solution to Ethnic Wars. Security Studies 10 (4):58116.

Erik Gartzke , and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch . 2006. Identity and Conflict: Ties That Bind and Differences That Divide. European Journal of International Relations 12 (1):5387.

Douglas M. Gibler 1996. Alliances That Never Balance: The Territorial Settlement Treaty. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (1):7597.

Douglas M. Gibler 2007. Bordering on Peace: Democracy, Territorial Issues, and Conflict. International Studies Quarterly 51:509–32.

Douglas M. Gibler 2012. The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jeremy Ginges , and Scott Atran . 2009. Noninstrumental Reasoning over Sacred Values: An Indonesian Case Study. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 50:193206.

Jeremy Ginges , Scot Atran , Douglas Medin , and Khalil Shikaki . 2007. Sacred Bounds on the Rational Resolution of Violent Political Conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (18):7357–60.

Hein E. Goemans 2006. Bounded Communities: Territoriality, Territorial Attachment, and Conflict. In Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization, edited by Miles Kahler and Barbara F. Walter , 2561. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jack A. Goldstone 2001. Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1):139–87.

Paul R. Hensel 1996. Charting a Course to Conflict: Territorial Issues and Interstate Conflict 1816–1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (1):4373.

Paul R. Hensel 2001. Contentious Issues and World Politics: Territorial Claims in the Americas 1816–1992. International Studies Quarterly 45:81109.

Paul R. Hensel , and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell . 2005. Issue Indivisibility and Territorial Claims. GeoJournal 64:275–85.

Paul K. Huth 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Carter Johnson . 2008. Partitioning to Peace: Sovereignty Demography, and Ethnic Civil Wars. International Security 32 (4):140–70.

Dominic D.P. Johnson , and Monica Duffy Toft . 2014. Grounds for War: The Evolution of Territorial Conflict. International Security 38 (3):738.

Philip L. Kohl 1998. Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology 27:223–46.

Benjamin Miller . 2007. States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Anssi Paasi . 1991. Deconstructing Regions: Notes on Scales of Spatial Life. Environment and Planning A 23:239–56.

Jan Penrose . 2002. Nations, States and Homelands: Territory and Territoriality in Nationalist Thought. Nations and Nationalisms 8 (3):277–97.

Stephen M. Saideman , and R. William Ayers . 2008. For Kin or Country: Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.

Paul D. Senese , and John Vasquez . 2005. Assessing the Steps to War. British Journal of Political Science 35 (4):607.

John Vasquez , and Marie T. Henehan . 2001. Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research 38 (2):123–38.

John A. Vasquez 1995. Why Do Neighbors Fight? Proximity, Interaction, or Territoriality. Journal of Peace Research 32 (3):277–93.

Barbara F. Walter 2009. Reputation and Civil War: Why Separatist Conflicts Are So Violent. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Andreas Wimmer , Lars-Erik Cederman , and Brian Min . 2009. Ethnic Politics and Armed Conflict. A Configurational Analysis of a New Global Dataset. American Sociological Review 74 (2):316–37.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Nadav G. Shelef supplementary material S1
Nadav G. Shelef supplementary material

 Unknown (836 KB)
836 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 306 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 825 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.