Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping

  • Lise Morjé Howard and Anjali Kaushlesh Dayal
Abstract
Abstract

UN peacekeeping was not designed to wield force, and the UN's permanent five (P-5), veto-wielding Security Council members do not want the UN to develop a military capacity. However, since 1999, the UN Security Council has authorized all UN multidimensional peacekeeping operations under Chapter VII of the UN Charter to use force. The mandates do not serve to achieve the council's stated goal of maintaining international peace, nevertheless, the council repeats these mandates in every multidimensional peacekeeping resolution. Neither constructivist accounts of normative change, nor the rational pursuit of stated goals, nor organizational processes can explain the repetition of force mandates. Instead, we draw on insights from small-group psychology to advance a novel theoretical proposition: the repetition of force mandates is the result of “group-preserving” dynamics. The P-5 members strive to maintain their individual and collective status and legitimacy by issuing decisions on the use of force. Once members achieve a decision, the agreement is applied in future rounds of negotiations, even when the solution does not fit the new context and may appear suboptimal, illogical, or even pathological. Privileging the achievement and reproduction of agreement over its content is the essence of group preserving. We present an original data set of all peacekeeping mandates, alongside evidence from dozens of interviews with peacekeeping officials, including representatives of all of the Security Council's permanent members. We assess this original data using expected causal process observations derived from rationalist, constructivist, organizational, and psychological logics.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Allison Graham, and Zelikow Philip. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
Anderson Cameron, and Kildfuff Gavin J.. 2009. The Pursuit of Status in Social Groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (5):295–98.
Autesserre Séverine. 2010. The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett Michael N. 1997. The UN Security Council, Indifference, and Genocide in Rwanda. Cultural Anthropology 12 (4):447578.
Barnett Michael N., and Finnemore Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bones Alan. 2001. Peacekeeping in Sierra Leone. In Human Security and the New Diplomacy: Protecting People, Promoting Peace, edited by McRae Robert Grant and Hubert Don, 5564. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Bosco David. 2014. Assessing the UN Security Council: A Concert Perspective. Global Governance 20 (4):545–61.
Campbell D.T. 1958. Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Person as Social Entities. Behavioural Science 3 (1):1425.
Chapman Terrence L. 2011. Securing Approval: Domestic Politics and Multilateral Authorization for War. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Claude Inis L. Jr. 1966. Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations. International Organization 20 (3):367–79.
Clunan Anne. 2014. Why Status Matters in World Politics. In Status in World Politics, edited by Paul T.V., Larson Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth William C., 273–96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Coleman Katharina P. 2007. International Organisations and Peace Enforcement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Collier David, and Brady Henry E.. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Collier David, Brady Henry E., and Seawright Jason. 2010. Outdated Views of Qualitative Methods: Time to Move on. Political Analysis 18 (4):506–13.
Coser Lewis. 1955. The Functions of Small Group Research. Social Problems 3 (1):16.
Cunliffe Philip. 2013. Legions of Peace: UN Peacekeepers from the Global South. London: C. Hurst.
Dallaire Roméo. 2004. Shake Hands with the Devil. Boston, MA: De Capo Press.
Dafoe Allan, Renshon Jonathan, and Huth Paul. 2014. Reputation and Status as Motives for War. Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1):371–93.
DiMaggio Paul, and Powell Walter. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2):147–60.
Doyle Michael W., and Sambanis Nicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Findlay Trevor. 2002. The Use of Force in UN Peace Operations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Finnemore Martha, and Sikkink Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.
Foot Rosemary. 2014. “Doing Some Things” in the Xi Jinping Era: The UN as China's Venue of Choice. International Affairs 90 (5):1085–110.
Forsyth Donelson, and Burnette Jeni. 2010. Group Processes. In Advanced Social Psychology, edited by Baumeister E.R. and Finkel E., 495534. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fortna Virginia Page. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Freud Sigmund. 1921. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Translated by Strachey James. Vienna: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
Gberie Lansana. 2005. A Dirty War in West Africa: The RUF and the Destruction of Sierra Leone. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
George Alexander L., and Bennett Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gill Bates, and Reilly James. 2000. Sovereignty, Intervention, and Peacekeeping: The View from Beijing. Survival 42 (3):4159.
Global Policy Forum. 2012. Changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto in the Security Council. Available at <https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/102-tables-and-charts/32810-changing-patterns-in-the-use-of-the-veto-in-the-security-council.html>.
Gowan Richard, and Gordon Nora. 2014. Pathways to Security Council Reform. New York: Center on International Cooperation.
Guéhenno Jean-Marie. 2015. The Fog of Peace: A Memoir of International Peacekeeping in the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Haas Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hammarskjold Dag. 1974–1975. Public Papers of the Secretaries-General of the United Nations, edited by Cordier Andrew W. and Foote Wilder. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hirono Miwa, and Lanteigne Marc. 2011. Introduction: China and UN Peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping 18 (3):243–56.
Howard Lise. 2008. UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Howard Lise. 2015a. Peacekeeping, Peace Enforcement, and UN Reform. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 16 (2):613.
Howard Lise. 2015b. US Foreign Policy Habits in Ethnic Conflict. International Studies Quarterly 59 (4):721–34.
Howland Todd. 2006. Peacekeeping and Conformity with Human Rights Law: How MINUSTAH Falls Short in Haiti. International Peacekeeping 13 (4):462–76.
Hurd Ian. 2002. Legitimacy, Power, and the Symbolic Life of the UN Security Council. Global Governance 8 (1):3552.
Hurd Ian. 2008. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Janis Irving L. 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Katzenstein Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Larson Deborah Welch, and Shevchenko Alexei. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Reponses to US Primacy. International Security 34 (4):6395
Lewin Kurt. 1947. Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Channels of Group Life; Social Planning and Action Research. Human Relations 1 (2):143–53.
Lewis David. 1969. Convention. London: Blackwell.
Lickel Brian, Hamilton David, Uhles Neville, Wieczorkowska Grazyna, Lewis Amy, and Sherman Steven. 2000. Varieties of Groups and the Perception of Group Entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (2):223–46.
Macfarlane Neil, and Schnabel Albrecht. 1995. Russia's Approach to Peacekeeping. International Journal 50 (2): 294324.
Mackinlay John, and Cross Peter, eds. 2003. Regional Peacekeepers: The Paradox of Russian Peacekeeping. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
March James G., and Olsen Johan P.. 1998. Juxtaposing Rationalism and Constructivism: The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4):943–69.
Morphet Sally. 2000. China as a Permanent Member of the Security Council: October 1971–December 1999. Security Dialogue 31 (2):151–66.
North Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Novosseloff Alexandra. 2003. Le Conseil de Sécurité et la Maîtrise de la Force Armée. Brussels: Bruylant.
Olonisakin Funmi. 2008. Peacekeeping in Sierra Leone. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Panagiotou Ritsa. 2011. The Centrality of the United Nations in Russian Foreign Policy. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (2):195216.
Polikanov Dmitry. 2003. The Evolution of Russian Peacekeeping under President Putin. In Regional Peacekeepers: The Paradox of Russian Peacekeeping, edited by Mackinlay John and Cross Peter, 183201. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Renshon Jonathan. 2017. Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ruggie John. 1993. Wandering in the Void: Charting the UN's New Strategic Role. Foreign Affairs 72 (5):2631.
Sartre Patrice. 2011. Making UN Peacekeeping More Robust: Protecting the Mission, Persuading the Actors. International Peace Institute.
Stähle Stefan. 2008. China's Shifting Attitude Towards UN Peacekeeping Operations. The China Quarterly 195: 631–55.
Tardy Thierry. 2011. A Critique of Robust Peacekeeping in Contemporary Peace Operations. International Peacekeeping 18 (2):152–67.
Tardy Thierry. 2016. France: The Unlikely Return to UN Peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping 23 (5):610–29.
Thompson Alexander. 2009. Channels of Power: The UN Security Council and US Statecraft in Iraq. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Turner John, and Tajfel Henri. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Austin William G. and Worchel Stephen, 3347. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
United Nations. 2017a. UN Peacekeeping Operations Fact Sheet. Available from <http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/documents/bnotelatest.pdf>. Accessed 19 October 2017.
United Nations. 2017b. What Is Peacekeeping? Available from <http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/operations/peacekeeping.shtml>. Accessed 19 October 2017.
United Nations. 2017c. Troop and Police Contributors. Available from <http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/resources/statistics/contributors.shtml>. Accessed 19 October 2017.
Voeten Erik. 2001. Outside Options and the Logic of Security Council Action. American Political Science Review 95 (4):845–57.
Voeten Erik. 2005. The Political Origins of the UN Security Council's Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force. International Organization 59 (3):527–57.
Vreeland James Raymond, and Dreher Axel. 2014. The Political Economy of the United Nations Security Council: Money and Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weber Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Welch David A. 1992. The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect. International Security 17 (2):112–46.
Wohlforth William C. 2009. Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War. World Politics 61 (1):2857.
Yang Jiechi. 2016. Speech at the Reception for the Forty-fifth Anniversary of the Restoration of the Lawful Seat of the PRC in the United Nations. Beijing, 25 October.
Yermolaev Michael. 2000. Russia's International Peacekeeping and Conflict Management in the Post-Soviet Environment. Monograph no. 44, Boundaries of Peace Support Boundaries of Peace Support Operations. Moscow: Center for International Security and Conflict Management.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Howard and Dayal supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (140 KB)
140 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 30
Total number of PDF views: 426 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1292 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th December 2017 - 20th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.