Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Who Supports Global Economic Engagement? The Sources of Preferences in American Foreign Economic Policy

  • Helen V. Milner (a1) and Dustin H. Tingley (a2)

In this article we bring together opposing international relations theories to better understand U.S. foreign policy, in particular foreign trade and aid. Using votes in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1979–2004, we explore different theoretical predictions about preferences for foreign economic policy. We assess the impact of domestic factors, namely political economy and ideological preferences, versus foreign policy pressures. Our three main results highlight the differential effect of these factors in the two issue areas. First, aid preferences are as affected by domestic political economy factors as are trade preferences. Second, trade preferences, but not economic aid ones, are shaped by the president's foreign policy concerns; for economic aid, domestic political economy factors matter more than foreign policy ones. Third, aid preferences are shaped more by ideological factors than are trade ones, but ideology plays a different substantive role in each. Different constituencies support aid and trade. This finding has implications for foreign policy substitutability, “the internationalist coalition” in U.S. foreign policy, “statist” theories of foreign policy, and the connection between public opinion and legislative voting.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Chris Alden . 2000. From Neglect to ‘Virtual Engagement’: The United States and Its New Paradigm for Africa. African Affairs 99 (396):355–71.

Alberto Alesina , and David Dollar . 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1):3363.

Herbert B. Asher , and Herbert F. Weisberg . 1978. Voting Change in Congress: Some Dynamic Perspectives on an Evolutionary Process. American Journal of Political Science 22 (2):391425.

William P. Avery 1998. Domestic Interests in NAFTA Bargaining. Political Science Quarterly 113 (2):281305.

Michael A. Bailey 2001. Quiet Influence: The Representation of Diffuse Interests on Trade Policy, 1983–1994. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1):4580.

Robert E. Baldwin , and Christopher S. Magee . 2000. Is Trade Policy for Sale? Congressional Voting on Recent Trade Bills. Public Choice 105 (1-2):79101.

Eugene Beaulieu . 2002a. Factor or Industry Cleavages in Trade Policy? An Empirical Analysis of the Stopler-Samuelson Theorem. Economics and Politics 14 (2):99131.

Eugene Beaulieu . 2002b. The Stolper-Samuelson Theorem Faces Congress. Review of International Economics 10 (2):343–60.

J. Lawrence Broz . 2005. Congressional Politics of International Financial Rescues. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):479–96.

Brandice Canes-Wrone , William G. Howell , and David E. Lewis . 2008. Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Re-Evaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis. Journal of Politics 70 (1):116.

Ralph Carter . 1999. Congressional Trade Politics, 1985–1995. Congress & the Presidency 26 (1):6176.

Stephen Chaudoin , Helen Milner , and Dustin Tingley . 2010. The Center Holds: Liberal Internationalism Survives. International Security 35 (1):7594.

Jack Citrin , Donald P. Green , Christopher Muste , and Cara Wong . 1997. Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations. Journal of Politics 59 (3):858–81.

David H. Clark 2001. Trading Butter for Guns: Domestic Imperatives for Foreign Policy Substitution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (5):636–60.

David H. Clark , and William Reed . 2005. The Strategic Sources of Foreign Policy Substitution. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):609–24.

Kenneth Collier , and Michael Munger . 1994. A Comparison of Incumbent Security in the House and Senate. Public Choice 78 (2):145–54.

Paul F. Diehl 1994. Substitutes or Complements? The Effects of Alliances on Military Spending in Major Power Rivalries. International Interactions 19 (3):159–76.

Pushan Dutt , and Devashish Mitra . 2005. Political Ideology and Endogenous Trade Policy: An Empirical Investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1):5972.

Robert K. Fleck , and Christopher Kilby . 2001. Foreign Aid and Domestic Politics: Voting in Congress and the Allocation of USAID Contracts Across Congressional Districts. Southern Economic Journal 67 (3):598617.

Richard Fleisher , and Jon R. Bond . 1988. Are There Two Presidencies? Yes, But Only for Republicans. Journal of Politics 50 (3):747–67.

Richard Fleisher , Glen S. Krutz , and Stephen Hanna . 2000. The Demise of the Two Presidencies. American Politics Research 28 (1):325.

Gordon H. Hanson , Kenneth F. Scheve , and Matthew Slaughter . 2007. Public Finance and Individual Preferences Over Globalization Strategies. Economics and Politics 19 (1):133.

Ole R. Holsti 1979. The Three-Headed Eagle: The United States and System Change. International Studies Quarterly 23 (3):339–59.

Robert David Johnson . 2006. Congress and the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ronald W. Jones 1984. The Transfer Problem in a Three Agent Setting. Canadian Journal of Economics 17 (1):114.

David Karol . 2007. Does Constituency Size Affect Elected Officials' Trade Policy Preferences? Journal of Politics 69 (2):483–94.

Murray C. Kemp 1995. The Gains from Trade and the Gains from Aid: Essays in International Trade Theory. New York: Routledge.

Mark Kesselman . 1961. Presidential Leadership in Congress on Foreign Policy. Midwest Journal of Political Science 5 (3):284–89.

Paul Krugman . 1993. The Uncomfortable Truth About NAFTA: It's Foreign Policy, Stupid. Foreign Affairs 72 (5):1319.

Charles A. Kupchan , and Peter L. Trubowitz . 2007. Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States. International Security 32 (2):744.

Kung-Yee Liang , and Scott L. Zeger . 1993. Regression Analysis for Correlated Data. Annual Review of Public Health 14:4358.

Christopher Magee . 2010. Would NAFTA Have Been Approved by the House of Representatives Under President Bush? Presidents, Parties, and Trade Policy. Review of International Economics 18 (2):382–95

Bayless Manning . 1977. The Congress, the Executive and Intermestic Affairs: Three Proposals. Foreign Affairs 55 (2):306–24.

Bryan W. Marshall , and Brandon C. Prins . 2002. The Pendulum of Congressional Power: Agenda Change, Partisanship, and the Demise of the Post–World War II Foreign Policy Consensus. Congress and the Presidency 29 (2):195212.

Anna Maria Mayda , and Dani Rodrik . 2005. Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others? European Economic Review 49 (6):1393–430.

Wolfgang Mayer , and Pascalis Raimondos-Møller . 2003. The Politics of Foreign Aid: A Median Voter Perspective. Review of Development Economics 7 (2):165–78.

James M. McCormick , and Eugene R. Wittkopf . 1990. Bipartisanship, Partisanship, and Ideology in Congressional-Executive Foreign Policy Relations, 1947–1988. Journal of Politics 52 (4):1077–100.

Michael D. McGinnis 1990. A Rational Model of Regional Rivalry. International Studies Quarterly 34 (1):111–35.

Robert D. McKinlay , and Richard Little . 1979. The U.S. Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models. Political Studies 27 (2):236–50.

James Meernik . 1993. Presidential Support in Congress: Conflict and Consensus on Foreign and Defense Policy. Journal of Politics 55 (3):569–87.

James Meernik , and Elizabeth Oldmixon . 2008. The President, the Senate, and the Costs of Internationalism. Foreign Policy Analysis 4 (2):187206.

J. M. Neuhaus , J. D. Kalbfleisch , and W. W. Hauck . 1991. A Comparison of Cluster-Specific and Population-Averaged Approaches for Analyzing Correlated Binary Data. International Statistical Review 59 (1):2535.

Kevin H. O'Rourke , and Richard Sinnott . 2001. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence. Brookings Trade Forum, 157206.

Glenn Palmer , Scott B. Wohlander , and T. Clifton Morgan . 2002. Give or Take: Foreign Aid and Foreign Policy Substitutability. Journal of Peace Research 39 (1):526.

Patrick M. Regan 2000. Substituting Policies During U.S. Interventions in Internal Conflicts: A Little of This, a Little of That. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (1):90106.

Dani Rodrik . 1998. Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy 106 (5):9971032.

Douglas D. Roscoe , and Shannon Jenkins . 2005. A Meta-Analysis of Campaign Contributions' Impact on Roll Call Voting. Social Science Quarterly 86 (1):5268.

Bruce Russett . 1990. Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Kenneth F. Scheve , and Matthew J. Slaughter . 2001a. Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences Over Immigration Policy. Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1):133–45.

Kenneth F. Scheve , and Matthew J. Slaughter . 2001b. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences? Journal of International Economics 54 (2):267–92.

James M. Scott , and Ralph G. Carter . 2002. Acting on the Hill: Congressional Assertiveness in U.S. Foreign Policy. Congress & the Presidency 29 (2):151–69.

Carol B. Thompson 2004. U.S. Trade with Africa: African Growth & Opportunity? Review of African Political Economy 31 (101):457–74.

Dustin Tingley . 2010. Donors and Domestic Politics: Political Influences on Foreign Aid Commitments. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 50 (1):4049.

Peter Trubowitz , and Nicole Mellow . 2005. ‘Going Bipartisan’: Politics by Other Means. Political Science Quarterly 120 (3):433–53.

Eric M. Uslaner 1998. Let the Chits Fall Where They May? Executive and Constituency Influences on Congressional Voting on NAFTA. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3):347–71.

Paul D. Wolfowitz 1994. Clinton's First Year. Foreign Affairs 73 (1):2843.

Javed Younas . 2008. Motivation for Bilateral Aid Allocation: Altruism or Trade Benefits. European Journal of Political Economy 24 (3):661–74.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 572 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.