Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-10T01:45:16.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decision-making capacity evaluation in adult guardianship: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Sally McSwiggan ,
Susanne Meares  and
Melanie Porter
Sally McSwiggan*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
Susanne Meares
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
Melanie Porter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Sally McSwiggan, Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel University, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel 4056, Switzerland. Phone: +41 (0) 61 267 17 86, +41 (0) 79 244 75 78; Fax +41 (0) 61 267 17 80. Email: sally.mcswiggan@unibas.ch.
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Evidence of impaired decision-making capacity is a legal requirement for adult guardianship. To understand the quality of the evidence health professionals commonly provide in reports submitted to guardianship courts, a systematic review was undertaken to appraise the design and methodological quality of the published literature on health professionals’ written reports of decision-making capacity and to describe the content of these reports.

Methods:

Electronic searches from 1980 to 2015 identified 1183 articles of which 11 met the inclusion criteria where each evaluated quantitatively the content of health professionals’ written reports submitted to adult guardianship proceedings. Methodological quality of the selected studies was rated using a critical appraisal tool.

Results:

Nine studies sourced files from courts in the U.S. and one from Sweden; another reported on guardianship decisions from Australia. Four studies were rated as moderately strong or strong. Strengths included the use of comparison groups and a reliable and valid instrument to code reports. The review showed a person's medical condition was often cited as evidence of impaired decision-making capacity. Cognitive, psychiatric and functional abilities were less often described, and a person's values and preferences were rarely recorded.

Conclusions:

It is recommended health professionals describe the process by which a person makes a particular decision (their ability to understand, appreciate, reason and communicate) in addition to providing medical information, including cognitive, psychiatric and functional abilities. This approach provides support for a professional's opinion and evidence for a court. International studies of health professionals’ approach to decision-making capacity evaluation are needed.

Keywords

decision-making capacitycompetencyadult guardianshipsystematic review

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , March 2016 , pp. 373 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging and American Psychological Association. (2008). Assessment of Older Adults with Diminished Capacity: a Handbook for Psychologists. Washington, DC. American Bar Association and American Psychology Association. doi.org/10.1037/e543712011-001 Google Scholar
Anderer, S. (1990). A model for determining competency in guardianship proceedings. Mental & Physical Disability Law Reporter, 14, 107–114.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P. and Roth, L. (1981). Clinical issues in the assessment of competency. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 1462–1465. doi.org/10.1176/ajp.138.11.1462.Google Scholar
Australian Psychological Society and the Office of the Public Advocate. (2009). Guidelines for the Preparation of Neuropsychological Reports for the Guardianship List of the Victorian and Administrative Tribunal. Australian Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Barritt Lisi, L. and Barinaga-Burch, B. (1995). National study of guardianship systems: summary of findings and recommendations. Clearinghouse Review, 29, 643–654.Google Scholar
Bennett, H. and Hallen, P. (2005). Guardianship and financial management legislation: what doctors in aged care need to know. Internal Medicine Journal, 35, 482–487. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00895.x.Google Scholar
Björkstén, K., Fälldin, K. and Ulfvarson, J. (2014). Custodian for elderly with memory impairment in Sweden – a study of 260 physicians’ statements to the court. BMC Geriatrics, 14, 94–100. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-94.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. (2008). The mental capacity act 2005: promoting the citizenship of people with dementia? Health and Social Care in the Community, 16, 529–537. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00775.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Psychological Society. (2010). Audit Tool for Mental Capacity Assessments. Professional Practice Board and Social Care Institute for Excellence.Google Scholar
Bulcroft, K., Kielkopf, M. and Tripp, K. (1991). Elderly wards and their legal guardians: analysis of county probate records in Ohio and Washington. The Gerontologist, 31, 156–164. doi:10.1093/geront/31.2.156.Google Scholar
Carney, T. and Tait, D. (1997). The Adult Guardianship Experiment: Tribunals & Popular Justice. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Collopy, B. (1995). Power, paternalism and the ambiguities of autonomy. In Gamroth, L., Semradek, J. and Tornquits, E. (eds.), Enhancing Autonomy in Long-Term Care: Concepts and Strategies (pp. 3–14). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Crowe, M. and Sheppard, L. (2011). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: alternative tool structure is proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008.Google Scholar
Dudley, K. and Goins, R. (2003). Guardianship capacity evaluations of older adults: comparing current practice to legal standards in two states. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 15, 97–115. doi:10.1300/J0131v15n01_06.Google Scholar
Dunlop, C. and Sorinmade, O. (2014). Embedding the mental capacity act 2005 in clinical practice: an audit review. Psychiatric Bulletin, 38, 291–293. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.046870.Google Scholar
Ganzini, L., Volicer, L., Nelson, W. and Derse, A. (2003). Pitfalls in the assessment of decision-making capacity. Psychosomatics, 44, 237–243. doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.44.3.237.Google Scholar
Gibson, L. (2011). Giving courts the information necessary to implement limited guardianships: are we there yet? Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 54, 803–818. doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2011.604668.Google Scholar
Grisso, T. and Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heacock, H., Koehoorn, M. and Tan, J. (1997). Applying epidemiological principles to ergonomics: a checklist for incorporating sound design and interpretation of studies. Applied Ergonomics, 28, 165–172. doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(96)00066-x.Google Scholar
Hill, S., Mather, G. and James, A. (2006). Assessing decision-making capacity: a survey of psychiatrist's knowledge. Medicine, Science and the Law, 46, 66–68. doi.org/10.1258/rsmmsl.46.1.66.Google Scholar
Juretic, M., Martin, D., Taffet, G., Wilson, N., Gregory, P. and Luchi, R. (1993). Physician input into guardianship cases involving the elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 1009–1013. doi.org/10.1002/gps.930081207.Google Scholar
Kapp, M. (2002). Decisional capacity in theory and practice: legal process versus ‘bumbling through’. Aging and Mental Health, 6, 413–417. doi:10.1080/1360786021000007054.Google Scholar
Karlawish, J. (2008). Measuring decision-making capacity in cognitively impaired individuals. Neurosignals, 16, 91–98. doi:10.1159/000109763.Google Scholar
Keith, P. and Wacker, R. (1993). Guardianship reform: does revised legislation make a difference in outcomes for proposed wards? Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 4, 139–155. doi.org/10.1300/j031v04n03_10.Google Scholar
Lai, J. and Karlawish, J. (2007). Assessing the capacity to make everyday decisions: a guide for clinicians and an agenda for future research. Americal Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 101–111. doi:10.1097/01.JGP.0000239246.10056.2e.Google Scholar
Leatherman, M. and Goethe, K. (2009). Substituted decison making: elder guardianship. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 15, 470–476. doi:10.1097/01.pra.0000364290.86080.2f.Google Scholar
Mayhew, M. (2005). Survey of state guardianship laws: statutory provisions for clinical evalautions. Bifocal, 26, 1–2, 13–19.Google Scholar
Moberg, P. J. and Kniele, K. (2006). Evaluation of competency: ethical considerations for neuropsychologists. Applied Neuropsychology, 13, 101–114. doi:10.1207/s15324826an1302_5.Google Scholar
Moberg, P. J. and Rick, J. (2008). Decision-making capacity and competency in the elderly: a clinical and neuropsychological perspective. Neurorehabilitation, 23, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moye, J. (2011). Preserving the rights of individuals facing guardianship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305, 936–937. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.247.Google Scholar
Moye, J., Armesto, J. and Karel, M. (2005). Evaluating capacity of older adults in rehabilitation settings: conceptual models and clinical challenges. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 207–214. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.50.3.207.Google Scholar
Moye, J. and Braun, M. (2010). Assessment of capacity. In Lichtenberg, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Assessment in Clinical Gerontology, 2nd edn, (pp.581–618). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Moye, J., Butz, S., Marson, D., Wood, E. and the ABA-APA Capacity Assessment of Older Adults Working Group. (2007a). A conceptual model and assessment template for capacity evaluation in adult guardianship. The Gerontologist, 47, 591–599. doi:10.1093/geront/47.5.591.Google Scholar
Moye, J., Gurrera, R., Karel, M., Edelstein, B., and O’Connell, C. (2006). Empirical advances in the assessment of the capacity to consent to medical treatment: clinical implications and research needs. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 1054–1077. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moye, J. and Marson, D. (2007). Assessment of decision-making capacity in older adults: an emerging area of practice and research. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Science and Social Sciences, 62, 3–11. doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.1.p3.Google Scholar
Moye, J. et al. (2007b). Clinical evidence in guardianship of older adults is inadequate: findings from a tri-state study. The Gerontologist, 47, 604–612. doi:10.1093/geront/47.5.604.Google Scholar
Mullaly, E. et al. (2007). Assessment of decision-making capacity: exploration of common practices among neuropsychologists. Australian Psychologist, 42, 178–186. doi:10.1080/00050060601187142.Google Scholar
Newberry, A. and Pachet, A. (2008). An innovative framework for psychosocial assessment in complex mental capacity evaluations. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 438–449. doi:10.1080/13548500701694219.Google Scholar
Okai, D., Owen, G., McGuire, H., Singh, S., Churchill, R. and Hotopf, M. (2007). Mental capacity in psychiatric patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 291–297. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.035162.Google Scholar
O’Neill, N. and Peisah, C. (2011). Capacity and the law. SydUPLawbk1. (Sydney University Press). Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydUPLawBk/2011/1.html; last accessed 21 July 2015.Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. (2005). Guidelines for Conducting Assessments of Capacity. Capacity Assessment Office, Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General.Google Scholar
Pachet, A., Astner, K. and Brown, L. (2010). Clinical utility of the mini-mental status examination when assessing decision-making capacity. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 23, 3–8. doi:10.1177/0891988709342727.Google Scholar
Palmer, B. and Savla, G. (2007). The association of specific neuropsychological deficits with capacity to consent to research or treatment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 1047–1059. doi:10.1017/s1355617707071299.Google Scholar
Parker, M. (2008). Patient competence and professional incompetence: disagreements in capacity assessments in one Australian jurisdiction, and their educational implications. Journal of Law and Medicine, 16, 25–35.Google Scholar
Peisah, C., Forlenza, O. and Chiu, E. (2009). Ethics, capacity, and decision-making in the practice of old age psychiatry: an emerging dialogue. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 519–521. doi:1097/YCO.0b013e32833058e3.Google Scholar
Peters, R., Schmidt, W. and Miller, K. (1985). Guardianship of the elderly in Tallahassee, Florida. The Gerontologist, 25, 532–538. doi:10.1093/geront/25.5.532.Google Scholar
Sabatino, C. and Basinger, S. (2000). Competency: reforming our legal fictions. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 6, 119–143.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. and Capezuti, E. (1991). Guardianship: Protection versus peril. Geriatric Nursing, 12, 11–13. doi:10.1016/S0197-4572(06)80310-1.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCORPD) (2012). Available at: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml; last accessed 21 July 2015.Google Scholar
van Staden, W. (2009). Acceptance and insight: incapacity to give informed consent. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 554–558. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833168b9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed