Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-whph2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-11T07:39:01.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnostic utility and factor structure of the PTSD Checklist in older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2012

Robert H. Pietrzak*
Affiliation:
National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA National Center for Disaster Mental Health Research, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
Peter H. Van Ness
Affiliation:
Section of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Terri R. Fried
Affiliation:
Section of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Sandro Galea
Affiliation:
National Center for Disaster Mental Health Research, White River Junction, Vermont, USA Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University School of Public Health, New York, USA
Fran Norris
Affiliation:
National Center for Disaster Mental Health Research, White River Junction, Vermont, USA National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Robert H. Pietrzak, PhD, MPH, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University School of Medicine, 950 Campbell Avenue 151E, West Haven, CT 06516, USA. Phone: +860-638-7467; Fax: +203-937-3481. Email: robert.pietrzak@yale.edu.
Get access

Abstract

Background: Little research has examined the diagnostic utility and factor structure of commonly used posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessment instruments in older persons.

Methods: A total of 206 adults aged 60 or older (mean age = 69 years; range = 60–92), who resided in the Galveston Bay area when Hurricane Ike struck in September 2008, completed a computer-assisted telephone interview two–five months after this disaster. Using the PTSD Checklist (PCL), PTSD symptoms were assessed related both to this disaster and to participants’ worst lifetime traumatic event. Total PCL scores were compared to PCL-based, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV)-derived probable diagnoses of PTSD to determine optimal cut scores. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted to evaluate PTSD symptom structure.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated that a PCL score of 39 achieved optimal sensitivity and specificity in assessing a PCL-based, algorithm-derived DSM-IV diagnosis of worst event-related PTSD; and that a score of 37 optimally assessed probable Ike-related PTSD. CFAs revealed that a recently proposed five-factor model – comprised of re-experiencing, avoidance, numbing, dysphoric arousal, and anxious arousal factors – provided a better fitting representation of both worst event- and disaster-related PTSD symptoms than alternative models. Current Ike-related anxious arousal symptoms demonstrated a significantly stronger association with current generalized anxiety than depressive symptoms, thereby supporting the construct validity of this five-factor model of PTSD symptomatology.

Conclusions: A PCL score of 37 to 39 may help identify probable PTSD in older persons. The expression of PTSD symptoms in older adults may be best characterized by a recently proposed five-factor model with distinct dysphoric arousal and anxious arousal clusters.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable