Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Advance directives in dementia: issues of validity and effectiveness

  • Marike E. de Boer (a1), Cees M. P. M. Hertogh (a1), Rose-Marie Dröes (a2), Cees Jonker (a2) and Jan A. Eefsting (a1)...

Abstract

Background: Although advance directives may seem useful instruments in decision-making regarding incompetent patients, their validity in cases of dementia has been a much debated subject and little is known about their effectiveness in practice. This paper assesses the contribution of advance directives to decision-making in the care of people with dementia, with a special focus on non-treatment directives and directives for euthanasia.

Methods: The relevant problems from the ethical debate on advance directives in cases of dementia are summarized and we discuss how these relate to what is known from empirical research on the validity and effectiveness of advance directives in the clinical practice of dementia care.

Results: The ethical debate focuses essentially on how to respond to the current wishes of a patient with dementia if these contradict the patient's wishes contained in an advance directive. The (very limited) empirical data show that the main factors in medical decision-making in such cases is not the patient's perspective but the medical judgment of the physician and the influence of relatives. Insight into the experiences and wishes of people with dementia regarding advance directives is totally lacking in empirical research.

Conclusions: Ethics and actual practice are two “different worlds” when it comes to approaching advance directives in cases of dementia. It is clear, however, that the use of advance directives in practice remains problematic, above all in cases of advance euthanasia directives, but to a lesser extent also when non-treatment directives are involved. Although generally considered valid, their effectiveness seems marginal. Further empirical research into the (potential) value of advance directives in dementia care is recommended.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence should be addressed to: Marike E. de Boer, Department of Nursing Home Medicine EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: +31 204 449 687; Fax: +31 204 448 234. Email: m.deboer@vumc.nl.

References

Hide All
Alzheimer Europe (2005). Advance Directives. A Position Paper – 6/2005. Available at: http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/upload/SPTUNFUYGGOM/downloads/7939D9FD4CEE.pdf
Brauer, S., Biller-Adorno, N. and Adorno, R. (2008). Country Reports on Advance Directives. ESF Exploratory Workshop: Advance Directives – Towards a Coordinated European Perspective. Switzerland: University of Zurich. Available at: http://www.ethik.uzh.ch/ibme/news/advance-directives/Country_Reports_AD.pdf (last accessed 3 April 2008).
de Boer, M. E., Hertogh, C. M. P. M., Dröes, R. M., Jonker, C. and Eefsting, J. A. (2008). Use of advance directives in dementia: the patient's perspective. Palliative Medicine, 22, 400401.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Autonomy and the demented self. The Milbank Quarterly, 64 (Suppl. 2), 416.
Dresser, R. (1995). Dworkin on dementia: elegant theory, questionable policy. Hastings Center Report, 25 (6), 3238.
Dute, J. C. J. et al. (2000). Evaluatie Wet op de geneeskundige behandelingsovereenkomst [Evaluation of the Medical Treatment Contract Act]. Den Haag: Zorg Onderzoek Nederland.
Fazel, S., Hope, T. and Jacoby, R. (1999). Assessment of competence to complete advance directives: validation of a patient-centred approach. BMJ, 318, 493497.
Hertogh, C. M. P. M., de Boer, M. E., Dröes, R. M. and Eefsting, J. A. (2007). Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia. American Journal of Bioethics, 7, 4856.
Jaworska, A. (1999). Respecting the margins of agency: Alzheimer's patients and the capacity to value. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 28, 105138.
Moody, H. (1988). From informed consent to negotiated consent. Gerontologist, 28, 64.
Moody, H. (1992). Ethics in an Aging Society. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. et al. (2007). Evaluatie. Wet toetsing levensbeëindiging op verzoek en hulp bij zelfdoding [Evaluation. Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Act]. Den Haag: ZonMw.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rurup, M. L., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., van der Heide, A., van der Wal, G. and van der Maas, P. J. (2005a). Physicians’ experiences with demented patients with advance euthanasia directives in the Netherlands. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 11381144.
Rurup, M. L., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., Pasman, H. R. W., Ribbe, M. W. and van der Wal, G. (2005b). Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia. Patient Education and Counseling, 61, 372–80.
Schermer, M. (2009). Wiens leven, welke belangen? Over dementie, wilsverklaringen en het leven-als-geheel. In Rijpkema, P., van, G. Donselaar, Verbeek, B. and Wijsbek, H. (eds.), Als vuur. Opstellen voor Govert den Hartogh ter gelegheid van zijn emeritaat (pp. 109126). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedures) Act. (2002). Available at: http://www.nvve.nl/assets/nvve/english/euthlawenglish.pdf; last accessed 7 November 2008.
The, A. M., Pasman, R., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., Ribbe, M. and van der Wal, G. (2002). Withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia: ethnographic study. BMJ, 325, 13261330.
Tulsky, J. A. (2005). Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life. JAMA, 294, 359365.
van Delden, J. J. M. (2004). The unfeasibility of requests for euthanasia in advance directives. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 447452.
van der Maas, P. J., van Delden, J. J. M. and Pijnenborg, L. (1991). Medische beslissingen rond het levenseinde: het onderzoek voor de commissie onderzoek medische praktijk inzake euthanasia [Medical Decision-making at the End of Life]. 's Gravenhage: SDU uitgeverij.
van der Wal, G. and van der Maas, P. J. (1996). Euthanasie en andere beslissingen rond het levenseinde: de praktijk en de meldingsprocedure [Euthanasia and Other Medical Decisions concerning the End of Life: Practice and Notification Procedure]. 's Gravenhage: SDU uitgeverij.
van der Wal, G., van der Heide, A., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. and van der Maas, P. J. (2003). Medische besluitvorming aan het Einde van het Leven: De praktijk en toetsingsprocedure euthanasie. [Medical Decision-making at the End of Life: Practice and Review Procedure for Euthanasia]. Utrecht: Uitgeverij de Tijdstroom.
Vezzoni, C. (2005). The Legal Status and Social Practice of Treatment Directives in the Netherlands. Groningen: RUG.
Wet op de Geneeskundige Behandelingsovereenkomst (WGBO) [Medical Treatment Contract Act] (1995). Available at: http://www.hulpgids.nl/wetten/wgbo-tekst.htm; last accessed 7 November 2008 [in Dutch].
Widdershoven, G., and Berghmans, R. (2001). Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27, 9297.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed