Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Cohort differences in dementia recognition and treatment indicators among assisted living residents in Maryland: did a change in the resident assessment tool make a difference?

  • Quincy M. Samus (a1), Amrita Vavilikolanu (a2), Lawrence Mayer (a1), Matthew McNabney (a3), Jason Brandt (a1), Constantine G. Lyketsos (a1) and Adam Rosenblatt (a4)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213001610
  • Published online: 23 September 2013
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackground:

There is a lack of empirical evidence about the impact of regulations on dementia care quality in assisted living (AL). We examined cohort differences in dementia recognition and treatment indicators between two cohorts of AL residents with dementia, evaluated prior to and following a dementia-related policy modification to more adequately assess memory and behavioral problems.

Methods:

Cross-sectional comparison of two AL resident cohorts was done (Cohort 1 [evaluated 2001–2003] and Cohort 2 [evaluated 2004–2006]) from the Maryland Assisted Living studies. Initial in-person evaluations of residents with dementia (n = 248) were performed from a random sample of 28 AL facilities in Maryland (physician examination, clinical characteristics, and staff and family recognition of dementia included). Adequacy of dementia workup and treatment was rated by an expert consensus panel.

Results:

Staff recognition of dementia was better in Cohort 1 than in Cohort 2 (77% vs. 63%, p = 0.011), with no significant differences in family recognition (86% vs. 85%, p = 0.680), or complete treatment ratings (52% vs. 64%, p = 0.060). In adjusted logistic regression, cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms correlated with staff recognition; and cognitive impairment correlated with family recognition. Increased age and cognitive impairment reduced odds of having a complete dementia workup. Odds of having complete dementia treatment was reduced by age and having more depressive symptoms. Cohort was not predictive of dementia recognition or treatment indicators in adjusted models.

Conclusions:

We noted few cohort differences in dementia care indicators after accounting for covariates, and concluded that rates of dementia recognition and treatment did not appear to change much organically following the policy modifications.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Quincy M. Samus, PhD, MS, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 5300 Alpha Commons Drive, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. Phone: +1-410-550-6744. Email: qmiles@jhmi.edu.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. Alexopoulos , R. Abrams , R. Young and C. Shamoian (1988). Use of Cornell scale in nondemented patients. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 36, 230236.

J. Cummings , M. Mega , K. Gray , S. Rosenberg-hompson , D. Carusi and J. Gornbein (1994). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 44, 23082314.

M. Folstein , S. Folstein and P. McHugh (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.

C. G. Lyketsos et al. (1999). The General Medical Health Rating: a bedside global rating of medical comorbidity in patients with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47, 487491.

C. G. Lyketsos et al. (2007). Effect of dementia and treatment of dementia on time to discharge from assisted living facilities: The Maryland-Assisted Living Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 10311037. doi: 10.1111/j.15325415.2007.01225.x

H. Magsi and T. Malloy (2005). Under-recognition of cognitive impairment in assisted living facilities. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 295298. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53117.x.

D. T. Maust et al. (2006). Predictors of caregiver unawareness and non-treatment of dementia among residents of assisted living facilities: The Maryland Assisted Living Study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 668675. doi: 10.1097/01.jgp.0000209214.28172.45.

A. Rosenblatt et al. (2004). The Maryland Assisted Living Study: pevalence, recognition, and treatment of dementia and other psychiatric disorders in the assisted living population of Central Maryland. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 16181625. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52452.x.

A. Rosenblatt et al. (2008). Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in assisted living: patterns of use and association of retention. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 178184. doi: 10.1002/gps.1859.

K. Ruckdeschel and I. Katz (2004). Care of dementia and other mental disorders in assisted living facilities: new research and borrowed knowledge. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 17711773. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52476.x.

Q. M. Samus et al. (2005). The association of neuropsychiatric symptoms and environment with quality of life in assisted living residents with dementia. Gerontologist, 45 (Suppl. 1), 1926.

Q. M. Samus et al. (2009). Correlates of functional dependence among recently admitted assisted living residents with and without dementia. Journal of American Medical Directors Association, 10, 323329. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.01.004.

Q. M. Samus et al. (2013). 12-month incidence, prevalence, persistence and treatment of mental disorders among individuals recently admitted to assisted living facilities in Maryland. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 721731. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002244.

L. Teri et al. (2010). Staff training in assisted living: evaluating treatment fidelity. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 502509.

L. C. Watson et al. (2006). Depression in assisted living is common and related to physical burden. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 876883.

I. Wilkinson and J. Graham-White (1980). Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scales (PGDRS): a method of assessment for use by nurses. British Journcal of Psychiatry, 137, 558565.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Psychogeriatrics
  • ISSN: 1041-6102
  • EISSN: 1741-203X
  • URL: /core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: