Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Development and initial validation of the Retrospective Indigenous Childhood Enrichment scale (RICE)

  • Cecilia Minogue (a1) (a2), Kim Delbaere (a2), Kylie Radford (a2) (a3) (a4), Tony Broe (a3) (a4), Wendy Sue Forder (a5) and Suncica Lah (a1) (a4)...

Abstract

Background:

Years of education is the most commonly used proxy measure of cognitive reserve. Other forms of cognitive stimulation in childhood may provide similar protection against cognitive decline, particularly in Indigenous groups, where education may have been lacking in quality or quantity. The Retrospective Indigenous Childhood Enrichment (RICE) scale was developed to measure non-school-based activities and environmental stimulation during childhood that are likely to have enhanced cognitive reserve. The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of the RICE scale with a group of older Aboriginal Australians.

Methods:

294 Aboriginal Australian people (60–92 years), living in urban or regional areas of NSW, completed the RICE scale as part of a longer face-to-face interview. Additional data was collected on their formal education, childhood environment, and childhood trauma (Study 1). Test–retest, inter-method and inter-rater reliability were assessed in a convenience sample of a further 38 participants by re-administration of the RICE scale at two time points, approximately 14 days apart (M = 14.11, SD = 6.78) (Study 2).

Results:

Factor analyses reduced the scale from 21 items to 18 and identified three factors: (1) Traditional, (2) Intellectual, and (3) Community. Higher scores on the RICE scale were related to higher years of formal education and lower scores on a childhood trauma questionnaire. The RICE scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.79), and excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.95, 95% CI 0.90–0.97) and inter-rater reliability (0.99, CI 95% 0.997–0.999).

Conclusions:

The RICE is, to our knowledge, the first standardized measure that assesses the level of childhood environmental stimulation in older Aboriginal Australians. This could provide an important supplementary measure, in addition to formal education, to investigate cognitive reserve and dementia risk in this population and enhance understanding of the links between childhood experiences and late-life cognitive decline.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence should be addressed to: Cecilia Minogue, Neuroscience Research Australia, Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. Email: c.minogue@neura.edu.au.

References

Hide All
Anstey, K. J. (2013). Optimizing cognitive development over the life course and preventing cognitive decline: introducing the cognitive health environment life course model (CHELM). International Journal of Behavioural Development, 38, 110.
Bernstein, D. P. and Fink, L. (1997). Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. San Antonio, Texas: Psychological Corporation.
Borenstein, A., Copenhaver, C. and Mortimer, J. (2006). Early-life risk factors for Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer's Disease and Associated Disorders, 20, 6372.
Caamaño-Isorna, F., Corral, M., Montes-Martinez, A. and Takkouche, B. (2006). Education and dementia: a meta-analytic study. Neuroepidemiology, 26, 226232.
Hall, K. and Hendrie, H. (2012). Early childhood environment and dementia. The Lancet, 380, 1112.
Jefferson, A. et al. (2013). A life course model of cognitive activities, socioeconomic status, education, reading ability and cognition. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59, 14031411.
Kramer, A., Bherer, L., Colcombe, S., Dong, W. and Greenough, W. (2004). Environmental influences on cognitive and brain plasticity during aging. Journal of Gerontology. 59, 940957.
Little, R. and Rubin, D. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Majer, M., Nater, U., Lin, J. M. S., Capuron, L. and Reeves, W. (2010). Association of childhood trauma with cognitive function in healthy adults: a pilot study. BMC Neurology, 10, 61.
Manly, J. and Mayeux, R. (2004). Ethnic differences in dementia and Alzheimer's disease. In Anderson, N., Bulato, R. and Cohen, B. (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Late Life. Washington: National Acadamies Press. accessed at ncbi.nim.nih.gov 3 March 2016.
Meng, X. and D'Arcy, C. (2012). Education and dementia in the context of the cognitive reserve hypothesis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and qualitative analyses. PLos ONE, 7, e38268. doi: 10.1371.journal.oine.0038268.
Nucci, M., Mapelli, D. and Mondini, S. (2012). Cognitive reserve index questionnaire (CRIq): a new instrument for measuring cognitive reserve. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 218226. Epub 2011/06/22.
Pesonen, A. K. et al. (2013). Cognitive ability and decline after early life stress exposure. Neurobiology of Aging, 34, 16741679.
Radford, K. et al. (2014). The koori growing old well study: investigating aging and dementia in urban Aboriginal Australians. International Psychogeriatrics, 26, 10331043.
Radford, K. et al. (2015). Prevalence of dementia in urban and regional Aboriginal Australians. Alzheimers Dementia, 11, 271279.
Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1973). Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, 182, 553559.
Sharp, E. and Gatz, M. (2011). The relationship between education and dementia: an updated Systematic Review. Alzheimer's Disease and Associated Disorders, 25, 289304.
Smith, K. (2008). High prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment in Indigenous Australians. Neurology, 71, 14701473.
Stern, Y. (2009). Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47, 20152028.
Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd edn. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Wilson, R., Barnes, L. and Bennett, D. (2003). Assessment of lifetime participation in cognitively stimulating activities. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 634642.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed