Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:55:05.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patients with mental–physical multimorbidity: do not let them fall by the wayside

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

Anne M. A. van den Brink
Affiliation:
Specialized Geriatric Care Centre “Joachim en Anna,” De Waalboog, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Email: anne.vandenbrink@radboudumc.nl Department of Primary and Community Care, Centre for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Nijmegen, Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Debby L. Gerritsen
Affiliation:
Department of Primary and Community Care, Centre for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Nijmegen, Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Richard C. Oude Voshaar
Affiliation:
University Center for Psychiatry, and Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology of Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Raymond T. C. M. Koopmans
Affiliation:
Specialized Geriatric Care Centre “Joachim en Anna,” De Waalboog, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Email: anne.vandenbrink@radboudumc.nl Department of Primary and Community Care, Centre for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Nijmegen, Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although exact figures are lacking, many studies show that mental–physical multimorbidity is common in older people (van den Brink et al., 2013). Particularly, older patients with a chronic disease often have psychiatric disorders (Verdurmen et al., 2006). Conversely, medical comorbidity is common in psychiatric patients, especially cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurological disorders and diabetes (Lyketsos et al., 2002).

Type
Guest Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2014 

Introduction

Although exact figures are lacking, many studies show that mental–physical multimorbidity is common in older people (van den Brink et al., Reference van den Brink, Gerritsen, Voshaar and Koopmans2013). Particularly, older patients with a chronic disease often have psychiatric disorders (Verdurmen et al., Reference Verdurmen, Ten Have, Van Dorsselaar, Van Land, Vollebergh and De Graaf2006). Conversely, medical comorbidity is common in psychiatric patients, especially cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurological disorders and diabetes (Lyketsos et al., Reference Lyketsos, Dunn, Kaminsky and Breakey2002).

Patients with mental–physical multimorbidity can benefit from integrated mental and physical healthcare, and a variety of care models has been introduced accordingly (Bartels, Reference Bartels2004). For instance, in primary care there is a growing interest in collaborative care programs, in which primary care providers, care managers, and psychiatric consultants work together to provide care and monitor the patients (Craven and Bland, Reference Craven and Bland2006; Thota et al., Reference Thota2012; Unützer et al., Reference Unützer, Schoenbaum and Druss2013). In secondary care, integrated care for older patients with mental–physical multimorbidity is available on geriatric wards and psychiatric medical units of general, academic, and psychiatric hospitals. In spite of this, a group of patients is at risk of falling between two stools, namely chronic psychiatric patients who need long-term residential care because of additional physical disorders.

An example of this type of patients is a 63-years old woman with depression, panic attacks, and a mixed personality disorder with dependent and histrionic features, and concomitant multiple sclerosis. She lived alone and received intensive home care, because of immobility and full dependency in activities of daily living due to the progressive neurological deficits. After the relative who cared for her died, she often phoned the home care organization for help. The home care organization was not able to provide what she requested.

Another example is a man, aged 72 years, with psychotic depression, tardive dyskinesia, and serious diabetes insipidus. Psychiatric hospitalization was necessary because of severe symptoms of psychotic depression, including nihilistic delusions, suicidality, and delirium caused by dehydration as a result of the diabetes insipidus. After rehydration and intensive psychiatric treatment, the patient stabilized. However, extensive care remained necessary, both to prevent dehydration as well as to prevent recurrence of a severe depressive episode. Because of these care needs and the high burden his wife experienced, discharge back home was impossible.

Previously, such patients would likely have stayed in psychiatric hospitals for the rest of their lives. However, since the 1950s, deinstitutionalization has dominated mental healthcare reforms in most industrialized countries. As a result, the total number of psychiatric hospital beds has decreased dramatically. Since then, long-term care (LTC) facilities have partly taken over the traditional asylum function of psychiatric hospitals (Bartels et al., Reference Bartels, Miles, Dums and Levine2003; Davis et al., Reference Davis, Fulginiti, Kriegel and Brekke2012). Initially, there was a trend of the so-called transinstitutionalization: a part of the former psychiatric inmates moved to LTC facilities (Grabowski et al., Reference Grabowski, Aschbrenner, Feng and Mor2009; Novella, Reference Novella2010). In addition, since the 1990s a trend of reinstitutionalization of people with long-term and more complex mental health needs and those with a forensic–psychiatric history is going on, resulting in increased numbers of forensic beds, places in prisons, and also in community-based nursing and residential care homes (Priebe and Turner, Reference Priebe and Turner2003; Priebe et al., Reference Priebe2005; Priebe et al., Reference Priebe2008). This reinstitutionalization has occurred largely unnoticed by policy-makers, and systematic research into its reasons, costs, and effects is lacking almost completely (Priebe and Turner, Reference Priebe and Turner2003; Fullerton et al., Reference Fullerton, McGuire, Feng, Mor and Grabowski2009; Macpherson et al., Reference Macpherson, Edwards, Chilvers, David and Elliott2009). Given the differences in national healthcare systems, this has resulted in a wide range of LTC facilities for heterogeneous groups of residents with mental illnesses (World Health Organization, 2003; Caldas de Almeida and Killaspy, Reference Caldas de Almeida and Killaspy2011; van den Brink et al., Reference van den Brink, Gerritsen, Voshaar and Koopmans2013). However, it has been doubted whether these LTC facilities address the mental health needs of these residents adequately (Snowdon, Reference Snowdon2010).

In the Netherlands, nursing homes have a long tradition of housing patients in units that provide specific care to a particular group of residents, needing multiprofessional care that cannot be offered by home care or in assisted living facilities (Koopmans et al., Reference Koopmans, Lavrijsen and Hoek2013). Individual treatment is based on personal needs and wishes of each resident within an appropriate social living environment. In order to achieve all this, a unique organization of nursing home care has been developed. Dutch nursing homes employ not only nursing staff but also their own medical, paramedical, and psychosocial staff, including a specially trained physician (Schols et al., Reference Schols, Crebolder and van Weel2004). This so-called elderly care physician (ECP) has completed a three-year full-time training program that makes him or her a medical practitioner who has specialized as a primary care expert in geriatric medicine and qualified as a basic specialist with expertise in geriatric medicine (Koopmans et al., Reference Koopmans, Lavrijsen, Hoek, Went and Schols2010).

Some traditional nursing homes are evolving toward centers for specialized care, among others for older people with mental–physical multimorbidity (Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, 2007). The care needs of these patients differ from those of nursing home residents with dementia or with only physical conditions (Grabowski et al., Reference Grabowski, Aschbrenner, Rome and Bartels2010). Therefore, we think these residents will benefit from living in specialized units, the so-called geronto-psychiatric nursing home units. Below we will discuss the preconditions for these units.

Preconditions

Competences of the multidisciplinary team

Geronto-psychiatric nursing home units have to be run by a specialized multidisciplinary team that consists of at least an ECP (or other physician with similar expertise), a psychologist, and a nurse specialist. It is their job not only to assess, treat, and support residents but also to coach the nursing staff. It is difficult to interpret signs, symptoms, and care needs of residents with mental–physical multimorbidity. Psychiatric diseases and personality disorders affect the way patients present their physical symptoms and needs (Health Council of the Netherlands, 2008). Alternatively, symptoms caused by a physical condition, such as decreased responsiveness and lack of energy, can also be interpreted as symptoms of a psychiatric disorder, for example depression (Alexopoulos et al., Reference Alexopoulos, Buckwalter, Olin, Martinez, Wainscott and Krishnan2002; Krishnan et al., Reference Krishnan2002; Hackett et al., Reference Hackett, Kohler, O’Brien and Mead2014). Besides, guidelines mostly focus on a single disease whereby the issues arising from multimorbidity are neglected.

Therefore, all members of the specialized multidisciplinary team must have appropriate skills to identify signs of mental and physical disruptions at an early stage. They must have broad knowledge about medical and psychiatric conditions and their mutual influence and should be able to apply this knowledge in the diagnostic and therapeutic process. In addition, to complement the predominantly physical care, professionals should be trained in counseling strategies and recognize the influence of their own personal characteristics when interacting with these residents to prevent iatrogenic counter-transference dynamics.

Collaboration

Unfortunately, the availability and quality of mental health services in nursing homes is perceived as a bottleneck in many countries (Bartels, Reference Bartels2004; Grabowski et al., Reference Grabowski, Aschbrenner, Rome and Bartels2010; Li, Reference Li2010; Snowdon, Reference Snowdon2010). Even if a specialized multidisciplinary team is available for residents of a geronto-psychiatric nursing home unit, this team has to collaborate with medical and mental healthcare specialists in order to provide optimal care to these residents. On the one hand, it is important to arrange routine presence of qualified mental health clinicians for ongoing consultation and follow-up during episodes of acute illness, for management of maintenance treatment, and for programmatic consultation to the facility and its staff (Bartels et al., Reference Bartels, Moak and Dums2002). On the other hand, clear agreements are required about referral of residents for diagnostic investigation, and for therapy that cannot be carried out in the nursing home. Staff members should thus know the limits of their professional competence and refer residents timely if that is indicated.

Supportive environment

A supportive environment includes physical design concepts as well as the social environment and organizational setting. This environment can strengthen or undermine mental health (Evans, Reference Evans2003; Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health, 2006). The literature on supportive environments for nursing home residents with mental health problems focuses on residents with dementia. The resulting design principles (Lawton et al., Reference Lawton, Weisman, Sloane, Norris-Baker, Calkins and Zimmerman2000; Fleming and Purandare, Reference Fleming and Purandare2010) may not be appropriate for achieving a supportive environment specifically tailored to the needs of residents with mental–physical multimorbidity.

Interestingly, there is a risk that nursing homes, from their proficiency in caring for residents with dementia, provide an environment that is too supportive for residents with mental–physical multimorbidity. Based on the experience of inpatient mental health, it seems to be appropriate for residents of a geronto-psychiatric nursing home unit to create a therapeutic milieu, including the following practices: containment (meeting the basic needs and providing physical care and safety to the people within the environment), support (giving kindness as the basis for a structure that fosters predictability and control), structure (having a predictable organization of roles and responsibilities as well as setting limits when necessary), involvement (practices in which the resident engages in the social environment), and validation (affirming a resident's individuality) (Gunderson, Reference Gunderson1978; Mahoney et al., Reference Mahoney, Palyo, Napier and Giordano2009). In addition, there must be daytime activities adjusted to the wishes and capabilities of these residents of whom several are relatively young (van den Brink et al., Reference van den Brink, Gerritsen, Voshaar and Koopmans2013).

A unit for specialized care should consist of private rooms, where residents can store their property and where their privacy is ensured, and also of rooms for social, labor-oriented, and therapeutic activities. There must be multiple rooms, so that the size of the group and the amount of stimuli can be varied. Safety and oversight have to be guaranteed.

Recommendations

Nursing homes can play an important role in caring for patients with severe mental–physical multimorbidity if these will evolve toward specialized care centers, which have fulfilled the preconditions described above. We conclude with some recommendations:

  1. 1. To fulfill these preconditions optimally, regulatory and funding barriers need to be overcome (Grabowski et al., Reference Grabowski, Aschbrenner, Rome and Bartels2010); reimbursement policies should at least enable consultation, the provision of psychotherapies, staff education, and evaluation of therapeutic milieu (Reichman et al., Reference Reichman1998; Reichman and Conn, Reference Reichman and Conn2010).

  2. 2. “Good practices” of care for residents with mental–physical multimorbidity should move toward “best practices” with best evidence-based care. For this purpose, guidelines tailored to the specific characteristics and care needs of these residents should be developed.

  3. 3. The above-described preconditions generate the following research agenda: it is essential to investigate the care needs of these residents, most effective therapies and care models, and the required knowledge and skills of the members of the multidisciplinary team. Furthermore, the assessment of psychiatric and physical symptoms in patients with mental–physical multimorbidity is complicated. For the use in this group, we recommend clinimetric evaluation of potentially useful screening and diagnostic instruments designed for other patient groups. Where necessary, new instruments should be developed. Finally, research is needed for a better insight into all aspects of the supportive environment that maintain and enhance quality of life of nursing home residents with mental–physical multimorbidity without dementia.

  4. 4. There are considerable differences in long-term residential care arrangements between countries. Precisely because of different experiences, we can learn from each other. Hence, the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) has established the Long-Term Care Shared Interest Forum (SIF). Main objectives of SIF are to gather cross-national input when optimizing mental healthcare in LTC facilities and to support and strengthen mental health services in the LTC sector. Therefore, we recommend international collaboration, as in SIF, for both the development of guidelines and carrying out the research agenda (http://www.ipa-online.net/ipaonlinev4/main/programs/sif/sif_ltc.html).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Alexopoulos, G. S., Buckwalter, K., Olin, J., Martinez, R., Wainscott, C. and Krishnan, K. R. (2002). Comorbidity of late life depression: an opportunity for research on mechanisms and treatment. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 543558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, S. J. (2004). Caring for the whole person: integrated health care for older adults with severe mental illness and medical comorbidity. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, S249–257. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52601.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, S. J., Miles, K. M., Dums, A. R. and Levine, K. J. (2003). Are nursing homes appropriate for older adults with severe mental illness? Conflicting consumer and clinician views and implications for the Olmstead decision. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 15711579. doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51508.x.Google Scholar
Bartels, S. J., Moak, G. S. and Dums, A. R. (2002). Models of mental health services in nursing homes: a review of the literature. Psychiatric Services, 53, 13901396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldas de Almeida, J. M. and Killaspy, H. (2011). Long-Term Mental Health Care for People with Severe Mental Disorders. Brussels, Belgium: European Union. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/mental_health/docs/healthcare_mental_disorders_en.pdf; last accessed 16 November 2011.Google Scholar
Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health. (2006). National Guidelines for Seniors’ Mental Health: The Assessment and Treatment of Mental Health Issues in Long Term Care Homes (Focus on Mood and Behaviour Symptoms). Toronto, Canada: Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health. Available at: www.ccsmh.ca.Google Scholar
Craven, M. A. and Bland, R. (2006). Better practices in collaborative mental healthcare: an analysis of the evidence base. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 7S72S.Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, L., Fulginiti, A., Kriegel, L. and Brekke, J. S. (2012). Deinstitutionalization? Where have all the people gone? Current Psychiatry Reports, 14, 259269. doi:10.1007/s11920-012-0271-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dutch Health Care Inspectorate. (2007). State of Health Care Report: Task Reallocation Is Positive for the Quality of Care. The Hague, Netherlands: Dutch Health Care Inspectorate. Available at www.igz.nl.Google Scholar
Evans, G. W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 80, 536555.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. and Purandare, N. (2010). Long-term care for people with dementia: environmental design guidelines. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 10841096. doi:10.1017/S1041610210000438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fullerton, C. A., McGuire, T. G., Feng, Z., Mor, V. and Grabowski, D. C. (2009). Trends in mental health admissions to nursing homes, 1999–2005. Psychiatric Services, 60, 965971. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.60.7.965.Google Scholar
Grabowski, D. C., Aschbrenner, K. A., Feng, Z. and Mor, V. (2009). Mental illness in nursing homes: variations across states. Health Affairs, 28, 689700. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.689.Google Scholar
Grabowski, D. C., Aschbrenner, K. A., Rome, V. F. and Bartels, S. J. (2010). Quality of mental healthcare for nursing home residents: a literature review. Medical Care Research and Review, 67, 627656. doi:10.1177/1077558710362538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, J. G. (1978). Defining the therapeutic processes in psychiatric milieus. Psychiatry, 41, 327335.Google Scholar
Hackett, M. L., Kohler, S., O’Brien, J. T. and Mead, G. E. (2014). Neuropsychiatric outcomes of stroke. Lancet Neurology, 13, 525534. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70016-X.Google Scholar
Health Council of the Netherlands. (2008). Health Care for the Elderly with Multimorbidity. The Hague, Netherlands: Health Council of the Netherland. Available at: http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/200801.pdf; last accessed 22 January 2008.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. T., Lavrijsen, J. C. and Hoek, F. (2013). Concrete steps toward academic medicine in long term care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14, 781783. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.08.004.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. T., Lavrijsen, J. C., Hoek, J. F., Went, P. B. and Schols, J. M. (2010). Dutch elderly care physician: a new generation of nursing home physician specialists. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 58, 18071809. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03043.x.Google Scholar
Krishnan, K. R. et al. (2002). Comorbidity of depression with other medical diseases in the elderly. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 559588.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P., Weisman, G. D., Sloane, P., Norris-Baker, C., Calkins, M. and Zimmerman, S. I. (2000). Professional environmental assessment procedure for special care units for elders with dementing illness and its relationship to the therapeutic environment screening schedule. Alzheimer's Disease & Associated Disorders, 14, 2838.Google Scholar
Li, Y. (2010). Provision of mental health services in US nursing homes, 1995–2004. Psychiatric Services, 61, 349355. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.61.4.349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyketsos, C. G., Dunn, G., Kaminsky, M. J. and Breakey, W. R. (2002). Medical comorbidity in psychiatric inpatients: relation to clinical outcomes and hospital length of stay. Psychosomatics, 43, 2430. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.43.1.24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macpherson, R., Edwards, T. R., Chilvers, R., David, C. and Elliott, H. J. (2009). Twenty-four hour care for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD004409. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004409.pub2.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. S., Palyo, N., Napier, G. and Giordano, J. (2009). The therapeutic milieu reconceptualized for the 21st century. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 423429. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2009.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novella, E. J. (2010). Mental healthcare in the aftermath of deinstitutionalization: a retrospective and prospective view. Health Care Analysis, 18, 222238. doi:10.1007/s10728-009-0138-8.Google Scholar
Priebe, S. et al. (2005). Reinstitutionalisation in mental healthcare: comparison of data on service provision from six European countries. BMJ, 330, 123126. doi:10.1136/bmj.38296.611215.Google Scholar
Priebe, S. et al. (2008). Mental healthcare institutions in nine European countries, 2002 to 2006. Psychiatric Services, 59, 570573. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.59.5.570.Google Scholar
Priebe, S. and Turner, T. (2003). Reinstitutionalisation in mental healthcare. BMJ, 326, 175176.Google Scholar
Reichman, W. E. and Conn, D. K. (2010). Nursing home psychiatry: is it time for a reappraisal? American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 10491053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichman, W. E. et al. (1998). Psychiatric consultation in the nursing home. A survey of six states. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 6, 320327.Google ScholarPubMed
Schols, J. M., Crebolder, H. F. and van Weel, C. (2004). Nursing home and nursing home physician: the Dutch experience. Journal of American Medical Direrctors Association, 5, 207212. doi:10.1097/01.JAM.0000123031.43619.60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowdon, J. (2010). Mental health service delivery in long-term care homes. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 10631071. doi:10.1017/S1041610210000773.Google Scholar
Thota, A. B. et al. (2012). Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42, 525538. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.019.Google Scholar
Unützer, J., Schoenbaum, M. and Druss, B. G. (2013). The Collaborative Care Model: An Approach for Integrating Physical and Mental Health Care in Medicaid Health Homes. Baltimore, MD: Center for Health Care Strategies and Mathematica Policy Research (developed for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). Available at: http://www.medicaid.gov.Google Scholar
van den Brink, A. M., Gerritsen, D. L., Voshaar, R. C. and Koopmans, R. T. (2013). Residents with mental-physical multimorbidity living in long-term care facilities: prevalence and characteristics. A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 531548. doi:10.1017/S1041610212002025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verdurmen, J., Ten Have, M., Van Dorsselaar, S., Van Land, H., Vollebergh, W. and De Graaf, R. (2006). Psychische stoornissen bij mensen met een lichamelijke aandoening. Resultaten van de “Netherland Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study” (Nemesis). Utrecht, Netherlands: Trimbos. Available at: www.trimbos.nl.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2003). Organization of Services for Mental Health (Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Package). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/services/essentialpackage1v2/en/.Google Scholar