Skip to main content
×
Home

The sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Conflict Tactics Scale for detecting clinically significant elder abuse

  • Claudia Cooper (a1), Kate Maxmin (a1), Amber Selwood (a1), Martin Blanchard (a1) and Gill Livingston (a1)...
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Background: A third of family carers of people with dementia describe acting abusively in research studies, but far fewer cases of abuse are currently detected in clinical situations. This discrepancy may be explained by inadequate detection by health professionals, or disagreement regarding what constitutes elder abuse. This study was undertaken to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the revised Modified Conflict Tactics Scale (MCTS) for detecting clinically significant abuse.

Methods: We interviewed 220 family carers of people consecutively referred to psychiatric services with dementia in Essex and London (U.K.), using the MCTS to measure abuse. We defined abuse cases using (1) the MCTS conventional scoring system; (2) the Pillemer criteria; and (3) clinical judgment of an expert panel.

Results: Our panel judged that 15 (6.8%) of carers reported potentially clinical concerning abusive behavior; but 47 (21%) were cases according to the Pillemer criteria and 74 (34%) using the MCTS conventional scoring system. We developed a weighted MCTS scoring system, with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting clinically concerning abuse.

Conclusions: The MCTS could be used routinely in clinical practice with carers of people with dementia to detect clinically concerning cases of abuse, many of which are currently being missed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: Claudia Cooper, Dept of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, Holborn Union Building, Archway Campus, Highgate Hill, London, N19 5LW, U.K. Phone: +44 (0) 207 2885931. Email: ccooper@doctors.org.uk.
References
Hide All
Beach S. R., Schulz R., Williamson G. M., Miller L. S., Weiner M. F. and Lance C. E. (2005). Risk factors for potentially harmful informal caregiver behavior. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 255261.
Cooper C., Manela M., Katona C. and Livingston G. (2008a). Screening for elder abuse in dementia in the LASER-AD study: prevalence, correlates and validation of instruments. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 283288.
Cooper C., Selwood A. and Livingston G. (2008b). The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review. Age and Ageing, 37, 151160.
Cooper C., Selwood A., Blanchard M., Walker Z., Blizard R. and Livingston G. (2009) Abuse of people with dementia by family carers: representative cross sectional survey. BMJ, 338, b155; doi: 10.1136/bmj.b155.
Department of Health (2000). ‘No Secrets’: Guidance on Developing and Implementing Multi-agency Policies and Procedures to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. London: The Stationery Office.
Fulmer T. et al. (2005). Dyadic vulnerability/risk profiling for elder neglect. Gerontologist, 45, 498.
Kennedy R. D. (2005). Elder abuse and neglect: the experience, knowledge, and attitudes of primary care physicians. Family Medicine, 37, 481485.
Lachs M. S., Williams C. S., O'Brien S., Pillemer K. A. and Charlson M. E. (1998). The mortality of elder mistreatment. JAMA, 280, 428432.
National Center on Elder Abuse (1998). The National Elder Abuse Incidence Study. Available at: http://www.aoa.gov/eldfam/Elder_Rights/Elder_Abuse/AbuseReport_Full.pdf
Nelson D. (2002). Violence against elderly people: a neglected problem. Lancet, 360, 1094.
Oswald R. A., Jogerst G. J., Daly J. M. and Bentler S. E. (2004). Iowa family physician's reporting of elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 16, 7588.
Pillemer K. and Finkelhor D. (1988). The prevalence of elder abuse: a random sample survey. Gerontologist, 28, 5157.
Selwood A., Cooper C., Owens C., Blanchard M. and Livingston G. (2009). What would help me stop abusing? The family carer's perspective. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 309313.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Psychogeriatrics
  • ISSN: 1041-6102
  • EISSN: 1741-203X
  • URL: /core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 246 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.