Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Speed of processing training protects self-rated health in older adults: enduring effects observed in the multi-site ACTIVE randomized controlled trial

  • Fredric D. Wolinsky (a1), Henry Mahncke (a2), Mark W. Vander Weg (a3), Rene Martin (a4), Frederick W. Unverzagt (a5), Karlene K. Ball (a6), Richard N. Jones (a7) and Sharon L. Tennstedt (a8)...
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Background: We evaluated the effects of cognitive training on self-rated health at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years post-baseline.

Methods: In the ACTIVE (Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly) randomized controlled trial, 2,802 older adults (≥65 years) were randomly assigned to memory, reasoning, speed of processing, or no-contact control intervention groups. Complete data were available for 1,804 (64%) of the 2,802 participants at five years. A propensity score model was adjusted for attrition bias. The self-rated health question was coded using the Diehr et al. (2001) transformation (E = 95/VG = 90/G = 80/F = 30/P = 15), and analyzed with change-score regression models.

Results: The speed of processing (vs. no-contact control) group had statistically significant improvements (or protective effects) on changes in self-rated health at the 2, 3 and 5 year follow-ups. The 5-year improvement was 2.8 points (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the memory or reasoning groups at any time.

Conclusion: The speed of processing intervention significantly protected self-rated health in ACTIVE, with the average benefit equivalent to half the difference between excellent vs. very good health.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: Fredric D. Wolinsky, Department of Health Management, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, E205-GH, Iowa City, IA 52242, U.S.A. Phone: +1 319 384 5129; Fax: +1 319 384 5125. Email: fredric-wolinsky@uiowa.edu.
References
Hide All
Ball K. et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288, 22712281.
Cabeza R. and Nyberg L. (2000). Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and MRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 147.
D'Agostino R. B. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 22652281.
Diehr P., Patrick D. L., Spertus J., Kiefe C. I., McDonell M. and Fihn S. D. (2001). Transforming self-rated health and the SF-36 scales to include death and improve interpretability. Medical Care, 39, 670680.
Ferraro K. F. and Kelley-Moore J. A. (2001). Self-rated health and mortality among black and white adults: examining the dynamic evaluation thesis. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 56B, S195S205.
Folstein M. R, Folstein S. and McHugh P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.
Hanley J. A. and McNeil B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 2936.
Hosmer D. W. and Lemeshow S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
Idler E. L. and Benyamini Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 2137.
Idler E. L. and Kasl S. V. (1995). Self-ratings of health: do they predict change in functional ability? Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 50, S344S353.
Jobe J. B. et al. (2001). ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults. Controlled Clinical Trials, 22, 453479.
Kessler R. C. and Greenberg D. F. (1981). Linear Panel Analysis: Models of Quantitative Change. New York: Academic Press.
Maddox G. L. (1962). Some correlates of differences in self-assessment of health status among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 17, 180185.
Maddox G. L. and Douglass E. B. (1973). Self-assessment of health: a longitudinal study of elderly subjects. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 14, 8793.
Morris J. and Morris S. (1997). ADL assessment for use with frail elders. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 3, 1945.
Morris J. N. et al. (1997). Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 10171024.
Nunnally J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Salthouse T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403428.
Salthouse T. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology and Aging, 30, 507514.
Ware J. R. Jr., Snow K. S., Kosinski M. and Gandek B. (1993). The SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
Willis S. L. et al. (2006). Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA, 296, 28052814.
Wolinsky F. D. et al. (2006a). The effects of the ACTIVE cognitive training interventions on clinically relevant declines in health-related quality of life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 61, S281S287.
Wolinsky F. D. et al. (2006b). The ACTIVE cognitive training trial and health-related quality of life: protection that lasts for five years. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 61, 13241329.
Wolinsky F. D. et al. (2009a). The effect of speed of processing training on depressive symptoms in ACTIVE. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 64, 468472.
Wolinsky F. D. et al. (2009b). The ACTIVE cognitive training trial and predicted medical expenditures. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 109.
Wolinsky F. D. et al. (2009c). The ACTIVE cognitive training interventions and the onset of clinically relevant depressive symptoms. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B, 577585.
Wolinsky F. D. et al. (2009d). Does cognitive training improve internal locus of control among older adults? Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B, in press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Psychogeriatrics
  • ISSN: 1041-6102
  • EISSN: 1741-203X
  • URL: /core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 173 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.