Skip to main content

Validation study of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) in Portugal

  • Lia Fernandes (a1), Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira (a2), António Leuschner (a3), Sónia Martins (a4), Margarida Sobral (a3), Luís F. Azevedo (a5), Cláudia Dias (a5), Raimundo Mateos (a6) and Martin Orrell (a7)...

Background: The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) is widely used for multidimensional evaluation of older people with mental health problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate reliability and validity of a Portuguese version of CANE.

Method: A cross-sectional multicenter study was designed using a convenience sample of elderly mental health services' users. CANE was compared with EASYCare, GHQ12, MMSE, Barthel Index and GDS15 to assess criterion and construct validity. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were also assessed.

Results: 79 patients (76% female), with mean age of 74 (± 6.6) years were included. Most patients lived at home with a family caregiver, generally female. Only 32% had no carer. Dementia was the commonest psychiatric diagnosis (61%) and somatic comorbidity was very prevalent (85%). Kappa values (κ) for inter-rater item reliability ranged from 0.72 to 1.00 (mean values: 0.96 patient, 0.93 carer, 0.90 staff). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for total scores ranged from 0.95 to 0.98.

For test-retest item reliability, the mean κ value was: 0.80 patient, 0.77 carer, 0.81 staff. ICC for total scores ranged from 0.82 to 0.92. Given the absence of a gold standard, criterion validity was assessed by comparing CANE with EASYCare (rs0.460; p ≤ 0.01), GDS (rs0.615; p ≤ 0.01), GHQ (rs0.581; p ≤ 0.01) and Barthel Index (rs-0.435; p ≤ 0.01). Overall, inter-item and item-total correlations for CANE and item comparison with other measures indicated reasonable construct validity.

Conclusion: The psychometric proprieties of CANE seem to be consistently good, in accordance with other studies. Robust results on ecological, face, content, criterion and construct validity, as well as good reliability, were achieved. This version is a promising tool for research and practical use in Portuguese old age settings.

Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: Lia Fernandes, Rua de Ceuta, 53-1°, 4050-191 Porto, Portugal. Phone: +351 228 319890. Email:
Hide All
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CNRSSM (Comissão Nacional para a Reestruturação dos Serviços de Saúde Mental) (2007). Relatório – Proposta de Plano de Acção para a Reestruturação e Desenvolvimento dos Serviços de Saúde Mental em Portugal, 2007–2016. Portugal: Ministério da Saúde. 2007 April 12. Available at
Dech, H. and Machleidt, W. (2004). Relevance and applicability of the CANE in the German Health Care System. In Orrell, M. and Hancock, G. (eds.), CANE: Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (pp.2128). London: Gaskell.
Fernandes, L. et al. (2007). CANE en contexto clínico: estudio piloto. Anales de Psiquiatria, 23, 120121.
Fleiss, J. (1981). The measurement of inter-rater agreement. In Fleiss, J. L., Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Folstein, M., Folstein, S. and McHugh, P. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.
Goldberg, D. (1978). Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Slough: National Foundation of Educational Research.
Gonçalves-Pereira, M. et al. (2007). Versão portuguesa of Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly: desenvolvimento e dados preliminares. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública, 25, 718.
Graffar, M. (1956). Une méthode de classification sociale – échantillons de population. Courrier, 6, 445459.
Mahoney, F. and Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 6165.
Mateos, R., Ybarzábal, M., Garcia, M., Amboage, M. and Fraguela, I. (2004). The Spanish CANE: validation study and utility in epidemiological surveys. In Orrell, M. and Hancock, G. (eds.), CANE: Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (pp.2128). London: Gaskell.
Murphy, E. (1992). A more ambitious vision for residential long-term care. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 7, 851852.
Orrell, M. and Hancock, G. (2004). CANE: Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. London: Gaskell.
Phelan, M., Slade, M. and Thornicroft, G. (1995). The Camberwell Assessment of Needs: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 589595.
Philp, I., Armstrong, G., Coyle, G., Chadwick, I. and Machado, A. (1999). A better way to measure disability in older people. Age and Ageing, 27, 519522.
Pill, J. (1971). The Delphi method: substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 5, 5771.
Reynolds, T. et al. (2000). Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly: development, validity and reliability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 444452.
Rowe, G., Wright, B. and Bolger, F. (1991). Delphi: a re-evaluation of research and theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39, 235251.
Streiner, D. and Norman, R. (1995). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ybarzábal, M., Mateos, R., García, M., Amboage, M. and Fraguela, I. (2002). Validación de la versíon española del CANE. Escala de Evaluación de Necessidades para Ancianos de Camberwell. Revista de Psicogeriatria, 2, 3844.
Yesavage, J., Brunk, T., Rose, T., Huang, V., Adey, M. and Leirer, V. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 3749.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Psychogeriatrics
  • ISSN: 1041-6102
  • EISSN: 1741-203X
  • URL: /core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Fernandes supplementary material
Table 1.doc

 Word (91 KB)
91 KB
Supplementary materials

Fernandes supplementary material
Table 2.doc

 Word (35 KB)
35 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed