Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:36:18.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Privileging the Machines: American Engineers, Indentured Chinese and White Workers in South Africa's Deep-Level Gold Mines, 1902–1907

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Economists and historians have identified the period between 1870 and 1914 as one marked by the movement of capital and labor across the globe at unprecedented speed. The accompanying spread of the gold standard and industrial techniques contained volatile and ambiguous implications for workers everywhere. Industrial engineers made new machinery and industrial techniques the measure of human effort. The plight of workers in South Africa's deep-level gold mines in the era following the Anglo-Boer War of 1899–1902 provides a powerful example of just how lethal the new benchmarks of human effort could be. When by 1904 close to 50,000 Africans refused to return to the mines, mining policy began to coalesce around solving the “labor shortage” problem and dramatically reducing working costs. Engineers, especially American engineers, rapidly gained the confidence of the companies that had made large investments in the deep-level mines of the Far East Rand by bringing more than 60,000 indentured Chinese workers to the mines to make up for the postwar shortfall in unskilled labor in late 1904. But the dangerous working conditions that drove African workers away from many of the deep-level mines persisted. Three years later, in 1907, their persistence provoked a bitter strike by white drill-men.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2007 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis

Footnotes

The author would like to thank Carol Archibald, Roderick Aya, Joye Bowman, Sakhela Buhlungu, Malaika Chehab, Greg Cuthbertson, Michael Mcethe, David Montgomery, Rosanne Rutten, Keith Shear, Christoph Strobel, Charles Tilly, Charles van Onselen, and two anonymous readers for their helpful observations and criticisms. The remaining faults are my own.