Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Categorical obligation in international law

  • Harry Gould (a1)
Abstract

International Law in its current form is dominated by positivism and voluntarism; yet, it has accepted a number of concepts from the Natural Law tradition that seem on the face of things to ill-fit the dominant normative complex. Of primary concern here are the Natural Law notions of categorical obligation that have been brought into International Law in the form of jus cogens rules. A number of interesting questions present themselves. What are positivists doing talking about categoricals? How have they found a way to make this fit within their larger doctrine? Have positivists adopted the language of categorical obligation, but only the language, not the correlative practices? Is it simply a matter of smuggling in alien concepts and shoehorning them despite the lack of fit, or have they created something new that only seems not to fit? Ultimately, what we find is that International Law has accepted this idea in a form that ultimately is limited by voluntarism's insistence on the voluntary and specific character of all obligations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: gouldh@fiu.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Roberto. Ago 1957. “Positive Law and International Law.” American Journal of International Law 51:691733.

Andrea. Bianchi 2008. “Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens.” European Journal of International Law 19:491508.

Michael. Byers 1997. “Conceptualizing the Relationship between Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes Rules.” Nordic Journal of Internaitonal Law 66:211239.

Jonathan Charney . 1993. “Universal International Law.” American Journal of International Law 87:529551.

Jonathan. Charney 1985. “The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International Law.” British Yearbook of International Law 56:124.

Dan Dubois . 2009. “The Authority of Peremptory Norms in International Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law 78:133175.

Carlo. Focarelli 2008. “Promotional Jus Cogens: A Critical Appraisal of Jus Cogens’ Legal Effects.” Nordic Journal of International Law 77:429459.

Harry D. Gould 2010. The Legacy of Punishment in International Law. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Andrew. Guzman 2002. “A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law.” California Law Review 90:18261887.

H.L.A. Hart 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71:593629.

Louis Henkin . 1995. International Law: Politics and Values. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Charles. Jones 1999. Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harold Kongju. Koh 1997. “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?Yale Law Journal 106:25992658.

Ulf. Linderfalk 2008. “The Effects of Jus Cogens Norms.” European Journal of International Law 18:853871.

Hans J. Morgenthau 1940. “Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law.” American Journal of International Law 34:260284.

Alexander. Orakhelashvili 2006. Peremptory Norms in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Andreas L. Paulus 2005. Jus Cogens in a Time of Hegemony and Fragmentation.” Nordic Journal of International Law 74:297334.

Kal Raustiala , Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2002. “International Law, International Relations and Compliance.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons, 538558. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Bruno. Simma 1995. “The Contribution of Alfred Verdross to the Theory of International Law.” European Journal of International Law 6:3354.

Alfred von. Verdross 1966. “Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law.” American Journal of International Law 60:5563.

Prosper. Weil 1983. “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law.” American Journal of International Law 77:413442.

Jan Wouters , and Sten. Verhoeven 2005. “The Prohibition of Genocide as a Norm of Ius Cogens and Its Implications for the Enforcement of the Law of Genocide.” International Criminal Law Review 5:401416.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 92 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 133 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.