No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
research-article
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2016
Extract
The Irish executive during the nineteenth century resembled the imperial double-headed eagle, or even occasionally Cerberus. For the control of the Irish administration was shared between the lord lieutenant and the chief secretary. Of course, theoretically the latter was merely the assistant of the former. In fact they formed a (frequently uneasy) partnership, and, as will be shown, throughout the century the chief secretary's political importance tended to increase largely at the expense of his nominal superior, though admittedly the exact balance of power between the two offices tended to, fluctuate in accordance with the personalities of their holders. Finally, in the absence from Ireland of the chief secretary, a strong undersecretary could exercise power out of proportion to his place in the administrative hierarchy.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1955
References
1 For definitive lists of the lords lieutenants and chief secretaries, see Handbook of British chronology (London, 1939), pp. 107–27Google Scholar, and Hughes, J. L. J., ‘ The chief secretaries in Ireland ’, in I.H.S., viii. 59–72 Google Scholar. O'Brien's, R. B. Dublin Castle and the Irish people (London, 1909; 2nd ed., 1912)Google Scholar, though biased, contains a large amount of useful information on the workings of the Irish administration during the nineteenth century.
2 H.M.C., Cecil MSS, i. 401.
3 Hely-Hutchinson to Wyndham, 12 Aug. 1784 (B.M., Add. MS 37873).
4 Report of the select committee on civil government charges, p. 67, H.C. 1831 (337), IV. 399.
5 Commons’ jn. Ire., xvii. 684. For the form of appointment after the union, see Hughes, J. L. J., op. cit., I.H.S., viii. 68.Google Scholar
6 It was established at the union as an office in which the chief secretary could transact business when in London. A committee of inquiry in 1852 found some difficulty in discovering what work was done by its staff. (Report on the organization of the permanent civil service, pp. 80–6, H.C. 1850 (1713), xxvil, 112–18.)
7 Richmond to Bathurst, 5 Aug. 1812 (H.M.C., Bat hurst MSS, p. 193).
8 Wellington to Anglesey, 15, 18 June 1828 ( Wellington, , Despatches (1871), iv. 489, 491Google Scholar).
9 Grey to Anglesey, 13 June 1831 (Anglesey papers, in P.R.O., N.I.).
9a Clarendon told Kimberley that he would never have consented to be lord lieutenant with his chief secretary in the cabinet (B.M., Add. MS 44224).
10 Naas was in fact admitted six weeks after the formation of the cabinet ( Buckle, G. E., Life of Disraeli, iv. 445 Google Scholar).
11 Foster to Gladstone, 29 May 1881 (B.M., Add. MS 44158), Letters of Queen Victoria, series 2, iii. 164, 271Google Scholar.
12 Trevelyan to Gladstone, 20 Aug. 1883 (B.M., Add. MS 44335).
13 Spencer to Gladstone, 7 Oct. 1883 (B.M., Add. MS 44310).
14 Gladstone to Trevelyan, 23 Aug. 1883, 26 July 1884; Trevelyan to Gladstone, 26 July 1884 (B.M., Add. MS 44335).
15 Spencer to Gladstone, 20 Sept. 1884 (B.M., Add. MS 44311).
16 Spender, J. A., Life of the Rt Hon. Henry Campbell-Banner man (1923), i. 66–7Google Scholar.
17 Mackail, J. W. and Wyndham, G., Life and letters of George Wyndham, ii. 412, 425–6Google Scholar.
18 The correspondence between Long, Dudley and Balfour is quoted extensively in Petrie, C., Walter Long and his times (1936), pp. 86–97 Google Scholar.
19 Aberdeen to Campbell-Bannerman, 28 Dec. 1906 (B.M., Add. MS 41210). See transcript appended to this article.
20 Royal commission on rebellion in Ireland; minutes of evidence, p. 34, H.C. 1916 (8311), xi. 218.
21 Hansard, series 5, cxx. 271 Google Scholar.
22 Report on the organisation of the permanent civil service, pp. 80–6, H.C. 1850 (1713), xxvii. 112–8; and Royal commission on rebellion in Ireland, p. 1, H.C. 1916 (8279), XI.
23 Memoirs and correspondence of Viscount Castlereagh, iv. 28 Google Scholar.
24 Gregory was thought to exercise influence in patronage matters and his removal had been considered by Lansdowne and Lamb in 1827 ( Gregory, I., Mr Gregory's letter-box (London 1898), pp. 11–13 Google Scholar).
25 St Germans to Aberdeen, 23 Jan. 1853 (B.M., Add. MS 43207).
26 Hansard, series 4, cxli. 994 Google Scholar.
27 Diary and correspondence of Charles Abbot, Lord Colchester (1861), 1. 3O3–3OGoogle Scholar.
28 Hansard, xvii. 528 Google Scholar; N.S. i. 470; N.S. ix. 1212–1241, xxiv. 555–80; series 3, lxxiv. 834–61.
29 Russell papers (P.R.O., 30/22/8).
30 Lord lieutenancy abolition ﹛Ireland) bill, H.C. 1850, iii. 617.
31 Hansard, series 3, cxii. 899 Google Scholar.
32 Ibid., series 3, cxlvi. 1048 ff.
33 Ibid., series 3, cxcii. 346–62, ccvii. 1341.
34 Bessborough's memorandum and Bessborough to Gladstone, 26 May, 1871 (B.M., Add. MS 4443O).
35 Harrington to Gladstone, 20 Feb., 16 May 1871 (B.M., Add. MS 44H3).
36 Letters of Queen Victoria, series 2, ii. 136–8Google Scholar.
37 Spencer's memorandum on Gladstone's conversation with the queen (B.M., Add. MS 44307). There is in the Gladstone papers an unsigned, printed memorandum, marked ‘ confidential ’ and dated Dublin 16 Oct. 1871. With considerable vigour it urges that the office of lord lieutenant should be abolished, being replaced by ‘ an Irish Balmoral ’ and a secretary of state for Ireland (B.M., Add. MS 44617).
38 Spencer to Gladstone, 26 Jan. 1885 (B.M., Add. MS 44312).
39 Iris Ofigiuil, 4 Apr. 1922; London Gazette, 1 Apr. 1922.
40 B.M. Add. MS 41210, ff. 77–82. The capitalisation of the original has been retained.