Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T14:08:00.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zur Urgeschichte der Kelten und Illyrier. By Julius Pokorny Pp. 222. Halle a. Saale: Max Niemeyer. 1938. RM. 12.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page no 306 note 1 Pittioni, by confusing culture and language, gets himself into a complete tangle about the Celts (p. 219 f). There is a similar confusion in Pokorny's statement (p, 30) that the Celts (die Kelten) originated in an amalgam of the urnfield culture with the tumulus culture. By ‘ Celts ’ here he means perhaps‘ the culture of the Celts of the Hallstatt period ’

page no 308 note 1 Following up Pokorny's argument we deduce that his hypothetical British Goidels adopted p into their language as the result of contact with their hypothetical Illyrian predecessors ; yet, strange to say, those British Goidels who (as he supposes) conquered Ireland from the Illyrians remained unable to pronounce p, and turned this very name Pretani (Priteni) into Qriteni.

page no 308 note 2 So too our own Domhnall (Celtic *Dubnovalos), which has much the same meaning as Dubnorix.

page no 308 note 3 Compare the cognate Irish deity-name Creidne, and the P-Celtic tribal names Priteni, Paris it.