A Mulk of One's Own: Languages of Sovereignty, Statehood, and Dominion in the Eighteenth-Century “Empire of Hindustan”

Nicholas J. Abbott

doi:10.1017/S0165115320000303

A Mulk of One's Own: Languages of Sovereignty, Statehood, and Dominion in the Eighteenth-Century “Empire of Hindustan”

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2021

Nicholas J. Abbott

Article contents

Abstract
Footnotes
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

Over the course of the eighteenth century, India's Mughal empire (1526–1858) fragmented into a number of regional polities that were, in turn, gradually subsumed under the paramount authority of the British East India Company. This essay describes concomitant developments in the empire's Persianate political language, particularly with regard to ideas of sovereignty, statehood, and dominion. It argues that by the mid-eighteenth century, the Mughal “empire of Hindustan” was increasingly framed as a territorialised governing institution comprising emerging provincial sovereignties rooted in local ruling households. This conceptual dispensation, however, remained ill-defined until the 1760s, when a treaty regime dominated by the Company built upon this language to concretise the empire as a confederacy of independent, sub-imperial states. The essay contends that in the short term, this redefinition bolstered the authority of incipient dynasties in provinces like Awadh, but in the longer term generated conflicts that abetted the expansion of colonial rule and laid conceptual foundations for British paramountcy in India.

Keywords

sovereignty statehood Mughal empire Awadh British East India Company paramountcy

Type: Article
Information: Itinerario , Volume 44 , Special Issue 3: Beyond the Islamicate Chancery: Archives, Paperwork, and Textual Encounters Across Eurasia , December 2020 , pp. 474 - 501

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165115320000303 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Research Institute for History, Leiden University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Nicholas J. Abbott is Assistant Professor of History, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.

References

Bibliography

National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth (NLW)Google Scholar

–John Carnac PapersGoogle Scholar

–Robert Clive Papers, Original Correspondence (CR)Google Scholar

Maharashtra State Archives, Mumbai (MSA)Google Scholar

–Parasnis DaftarGoogle Scholar

National Archives of India, New Delhi (NAI)Google Scholar

–Foreign Department, Secret Proceedings (FDSP)Google Scholar

–Foreign Department, Persian Branch (FDPr)Google Scholar

–Foreign Department, Political Consultations (FDPC)Google Scholar

National Library of India, Calcutta (NLI)Google Scholar

–Sarkar Collection (SC)Google Scholar

Oriental and India Office Collection, British Library, London (OIOC)Google Scholar

–Oriental Mss., Or. and I.O. IslamicGoogle Scholar

–Richard Johnson PapersGoogle Scholar

–Warren Hastings PapersGoogle Scholar

ʿAbd-ul-karim, . Bayān-i wāqiʿ. Ed. Nasim, K. B.. Lahore: University of Panjab, 1970.Google Scholar

Abu'l Fath, . A Medieval Arabic-Persian Dictionary: al-Mulakhkhas fī al-Lughāt. Ed. Dadkhah, G. and Goodarznia, A.. Costa Mesa, Calif.: Mazda, 2014.Google Scholar

Aitchison, C. U., ed. A Collection of Treaties, Engagements and Sanads, Relating to India and Neighbouring Countries. 13 vols. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, 1909.Google Scholar

Arzu, Siraj-ud-din Khan. Chirāgh-i hidāyat. In Ghiyas-ud-din Muhammad Rampuri. Ghiyās-ul-lughāt maʿa chirāgh-i hidāyat. Lucknow: Nawal Kishore, 1890.Google Scholar

Aurangzeb, ʿAlamgir. Ruqqaʿāt-i ʿālamgīrī. Kanpur: Matbi-i Nizami, 1876.Google Scholar

Bahar, Lala Tekchand. Bahār-i ʿajam: farhang-i lughāt tarkībāt, kināyat wa amsā1 -i fārsī. 3 vols. Ed. Dizfuliyan, K.. Tehran: Talayah, 2001–2/1380.Google Scholar

Bilgrami, Ghulam ʿAli ‘Azad.’ Khizāna-yi ʿāmira. Kanpur: Nawal Kishore, 1871.Google Scholar

Brahman, Chandar Bhan. Chahār chaman-i brahman. Ed. Jafari, M. Y.. New Delhi: Markaz-i Tahqiqat-i Farsi, 2007.Google Scholar

Clive, R. A Letter to the Proprietors of East India Company Stock. London: Printed for J. Nourse, 1764.Google Scholar

Daghestani, ʿAli Quli Khan. Riyāz-ush-shuʿarā. Ed. Qasmi, S. H.. Rampur: Rampur Raza Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Dihlawi, ʿAbd-ul-haqq. Risāla-yi nūrīya-yi sultānīya. Ed. Akhtar, M. S.. Islamabad: Markaz-i Tahqiqat-i Farsi-i Iran wa Pakistan, 1985.Google Scholar

Forrest, G., ed. Selections from the Letters, Despatches, and Other State Papers Preserved in the Foreign Department of the Government of India, 1772–1785. 3 vols. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1890.Google Scholar

Ghulam ʿAli Khan, . ʿImād-us-saʿādat. Kanpur: Nawal Kishore, 1897.Google Scholar

Imperial Record Department. Calendar of Persian Correspondence, Being Letters, Referring Mainly to Affairs in Bengal, Which Passed between Some of the Company's Servants and Indian Rulers and Notables. 7 vols. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1911– 40 (CPC).Google Scholar

Khafi Khan, . Muntakhab-ul-lubāb. 2 vols. Ed. Ahmad, K.. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1869–74.Google Scholar

Long, J. Selections from the Unpublished Records of Government for the Years 1747 to 1768 Inclusive, vol. 1. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1869.Google Scholar

Mansaram, Lala. Māʾasir-i nizāmī. Ed. Parvin, Z.. Delhi: Kitab Ghar, 2015.Google Scholar

Mukhlis, Anand Ram. Mirʾāt-ul-istilāh. 2 vols. Ed. Shekhar, C. et al. Delhi: Kitab Ghar, 2013.Google Scholar

Mukhlis, Anand Ram. Safarnāma-yi mukhlis. Ed. and Urdu trans. Azhar, S. A.. Rampur: Hindustan Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Najm-i Sani, Muhammad Baqir. Advice on the Art of Governance: An Indo-Islamic Mirror for Princes: Mauʿizah-i Jahāngīrī of Muhammad Bāqir Najm-i Sānī. Ed. and trans. Alvi, S. S.. Albany: SUNY Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Polier, A. Shah Alam II and His Court, a Narrative of the Transactions at the Court of Delhy from the Year 1771 to the Present Time. Ed. Gupta, P. C.. Calcutta: S. C. Sarkar and Sons, 1947.Google Scholar

Tattavi, ʿAbd-ur-rashid. Muntakhab-ul-lughāt. Lucknow: Nawal Kishore, 1877.Google Scholar

Yusuf ʿAli Khan, . Tārīkh-i bangāla-yi mahābat jangī. Ed. Subhan, A.. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1969.Google Scholar

Abbott, Nicholas J. “Bringing the Sarkār Back In: Translating Governmentality and the State in Early Modern and Early Colonial India.” In State Formations: Global Histories and Cultures of Statehood, ed. Brooke, John, Strauss, Julia, and Adams, Greg, 124–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alam, M. The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India: Awadh and the Punjab, 1707–48. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Alam, M. The Languages of Political Islam in India: 1200–1800. New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004.Google Scholar

Alam, M., and Subrahmanyam, S.. “Introduction.” In The Mughal State, 1526–1750, ed. Alam, Muzaffar and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay, 1–71. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Alavi, S. “Introduction.” In The Eighteenth Century in India, ed. Alavi, Seema, 1–56. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Al-Azmeh, A. Muslim Kingship: Power and the Sacred in Muslim, Christian and Pagan Polities. New York: I. B. Tauris, 1997.Google Scholar

Anghie, A. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Athar Ali, M. The Mughal Nobility under Aurangzeb. Rev. ed. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001 (1966).Google Scholar

Barnett, R. B. North India between Empires: Awadh, the Mughals, and the British, 1720–1801. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Bayly, C. A. Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Benton, L. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Benton, L., and Ford, L.. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2016.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blake, S. P. “The Patrimonial-Bureaucratic Empire of the Mughals.” The Journal of Asian Studies 39:1 (1979): 77–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burak, G. “The Second Formation of Islamic Law: The Post-Mongol Context of the Ottoman Adoption of a School of Law.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55:3 (2013): 579–602.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chatterjee, K. “History as Self-Representation: The Recasting of a Political Tradition in Late Eighteenth-Century Eastern India.” Modern Asian Studies 32:4 (1998): 913–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Crone, P. God's Rule: Government and Islam. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Datta, K. K. Shah Alam II and the East India Company. Calcutta: The World Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Faruqui, M. D. “At Empire's End: Hyderabad and Eighteenth-Century India.” Modern Asian Studies 43:1 (2009): 5–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Faruqui, M. D. Princes of the Mughal Empire, 1504–1719. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fisher, M. H. A Clash of Cultures: Awadh, the British, and the Mughals. Riverdale, Md.: The Riverdale Company, 1987.Google Scholar

Fleischer, C. H. Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire: The Historian Mustafa ʿAli (1541–1600). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habib, I. The Agrarian System of Mughal India, 1556–1707. Rev. ed. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999 (1963).Google Scholar

Kinra, R. Writing Self, Writing Empire: Chandar Bhan Brahman and the Cultural World of the Indo-Persian State Secretary. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Leonard, S. P. “A Fit of Absence of Mind? Illiberal Imperialism and the Founding of the British Empire, 1757–76.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 2010.Google Scholar

Marshall, P. J. “Introduction.” In The Eighteenth Century in Indian History: Evolution or Revolution?, ed. Marshall, P. J., 1–52. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Marshall, P. J. The Making and Unmaking of Empires: Britain, India, and America, c. 1750–1783. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Moin, A. A. The Millennial Sovereign: Sacred Kingship and Sainthood in Islam. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Narayana Rao, V., Shulman, D., and Subrahmanyam, S.. Textures of Time: Writing History in South India, 1600–1800. Delhi: Permanent Black, 2006.Google Scholar

Nayeem, M. A. Mughal Administration of Deccan under Nizamul Mulk Asaf Jah (1720–48 AD). Bombay: Jaico Publishing House, 1985.Google Scholar

Ramusack, B. N. The Indian Princes and Their States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Siddiqi, N. A. Land Revenue Administration under the Mughals, 1700–1750. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1970.Google Scholar

Spear, P. Twilight of the Mughuls: Studies in Late Mughul Delhi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Srivastava, A. L. Shuja-ud-Daulah. 2 vols. Calcutta: S. N. Sarkar, 1939–45.Google Scholar

Stern, P. J. The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRef Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, S. “The Mughal State—Structure or Process? Reflections on Recent Western Historiography.” Indian Economic & Social History Review 29:3 (1992): 291–321.CrossRef Google Scholar

Travers, R. “A British Empire by Treaty in Eighteenth-Century India.” In Empire by Treaty: Negotiating European Expansion, 1600–1900, ed. Belmessous, Salia, 132–60. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Travers, R. Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth-Century India: The British in Bengal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Yılmaz, H. Caliphate Redefined: The Mystical Turn in Ottoman Political Thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar