Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:07:14.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asianism and the Duality of Japanese Colonialism, 1879–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Shinkichi Etō
Shinkichi Etō
Affiliation:
Tokyo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper examines aspects of Asianism (Ajia-shugi) and colonialism (shokuminchishugi) in Japan's prewar relationship with Asia, to illustrate the contradictions and dilemmas of that relationship. Before beginning, it is perhaps wise to remind readers just what Japan's territorial possessions comprised. Japan acquired Taiwan as a colony in 1895, and the Caroline, Marshall, and Marianas Islands of the Pacific as a mandated territory in 1919. In the quarter of a century between those two datas, Japan's territory grew by nearly 80 percent. The picture may be summarized as follows:

Taiwan, South Sakhalin, and Korea were Japanese “territory” in the narrow sense of that word. By contrast, Kwantung, a leasehold, and the Pacific Islands, a mandate, were Japanese territory only in the broad sense of that word. But insofar as they submitted to Japanese sovereignty, they fall within the category of Japanese colonies.

Type
Asia
Information
Itinerario , Volume 4 , Issue 1: History and Underdevelopment. Essays on Underdevelopment and European Expansion in Asia and Africa , March 1980 , pp. 114 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Taiwan nenkan (Taiwan yearbook), (Taihoku: Taiwan tsūshinsha, 1944), 16.Google Scholar

2 Seishi, Araki, Miyazaki Hachirō (Miyazaki Hachirō), (Kumamoto: Nippon dangisha, 1954), 62.Google Scholar

3 Ginkō, Kishida, “Wusun nikki” (Wusung diary), in Shakai oyobi kokka (Society and state), (Tokyo: Ikkösha, 1931).Google Scholar

4. Nihon gaikō bunsho (Diplomatic documents of Japan), vol. 3 (1870), doc. 88, attach. 1.Google Scholar

5. Kenkichi, Kodera, Dai Ajia ron (Essays on Great Asia), (Tokyo: Hobunkan, 1916), 256ff.Google Scholar

6. Shinkichi, Etō, “Nihonjin no Chūgokukan: Takasugi Shinsaku ra no baai” (Japanese Views of China: The case of Takasugi Shinsaku and others), in Niida Noboru Hakushi Tsuitō Ronbunshū Iinkai, comp., Niida Noboru hakushi tsuitō ronbunshū (Collected articles in memory of Dr. Noboru Niida), vol. 3, Nihonho to Ajia (Japanese law and Asia), (Tokyo: Keisō Shobō, 1970), 53–71. See esp. p. 65.Google Scholar

7. Kunzo, Hanawa, Ura Keiichi (Ura Keiichi), (Tokyo: Junpu shoin, 1924), 81–85.Google Scholar

8. Toten, Miyazaki, Sanjusan-nen no yume (The thirty-three year dream), (rep.; Tokyo: Heibonsha, 1902, 1969), 22–23.Google Scholar

9. Bunzō, Hashikawa, Jun-gyaku no shisō: Datsu-A ron igo (Loyal and treasonous thoughts: After datsu-A ron), (Tokyo: Keiso shobo, 1973), 33. See alsoGoogle ScholarJunji, Banno, Meifi: Shisō no jitsuzō (The real role of Meiji thought), (Tokyo: Sobunsha, 1977)Google Scholar.

10. Shirō, Kiyomiya, Gaichihō josetsu (Introduction to gaichi law), (Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1944), 38.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., 63–76.

12. kenkyūkai, Rekishigaku, kenkyūkai, Nihonshi, comp. Kōza Nihonshi (A series on Japanese history), vol. 6 (Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku shuppankai, 1978), 253.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., 255.

14. Yoshinori, Ino, Taiwan bunka shi (A record of Taiwan culture), vol. 2 (Tokyo: Toko shoin, 1928), 980.Google Scholar

15. Gotō Shinpei, with commentary by Nakamura Akira, Nihon shokumin seisaku ippan: Nihon bōchō ron ( A comment on Japanese colonial policies: Japanese expansion), (Tokyo: Nihon hyoronsha, 1935), 64.Google Scholar

16. keimukyoku, Taiwan sōtokufu, comp., Taiwan sōtokufu keisatsu enkakushi (A chronicle of police work of the Taiwan Government General), bk. 2, vol. 1 (Taihoku: Taiwan sotokufu keimukyoku, 1938), 829.Google Scholar

17. Gaimushō jōyakukyoku hōkika, comp., Taiwan ni shikō subeki hōrei ni kansuru hōritsu (rokujusan hō, sanjūichi hō oyobi sango) no gijiroku (Proceedings on laws no. 63, 31, and 3, relating to ordinances to be enforced in Taiwan), (Tokyo: Gaimusho joyakukyoku hokika, 1966)., 401.

18. Ibid, 419.

19. Yinshik, Park, with notes by Kang Toksang, Chōsen dokuritsu undō no ketsushi (The bloody history of the Korean independence movement), vol. 1 (Tokyo: Heibonsha, 1975), 79.Google Scholar

20. Ibid.

21. Tai-wan sheng hsing-cheng-chang-kuan kung-shu t'ung-chi shih, comp., Tai-wan sheng wu-shih-i nien lai t'ung-chi t'i-yao (Statistical synopsis of Taiwan province over the past 51 years), (Taipei: Tai-wan sheng hsing-cheng-chang-kuan kung-shu t'ung-chi shih, 1946), 763–778.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., 814.

23. Ibid., 818-820.

24. Ibid., 1147.

25. Ibid., 1241.

26. bunshoka, Takumu daijin kanbō, comp., Takumu yōran: Shōwa jūgonen han (Handbook of colonial affairs, 1940), (Tokyo: Zaidan hojin Nihon takushoku kyokai, 1941), 288.Google Scholar

27. Ibid., 296-298.

28. Christie, Dugald, Thirty Years in Moukden, 1883–1913 (London: James Clarke, 1914), 182–194.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., 194–195.

30. For example, at the same time that Japanese were spouting the slogan gozoku kyōwa (harmony among the five races) when Manshukoku was founded, they continued to enjoy extraterritorial rights in that new country.