Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-03T20:07:58.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion on Postmodernism in Latin American History*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Extract

The wonders of the computer age continue to amaze us. Much of what is purportedly new commands only scant interest, as we zap through inter-space. Sometimes, however, something worthwhile catches the eye and we read attentively. Not too long ago, we downloaded the following thread from the H-LATAM discussion list. The discussion that is reprinted below deals with the perennial question plaguing historians: how to find the right combination of facts and theory. We hope that our readers will enlighten themselves with this lively debate.

Type
Internet Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Leitch, Vincent B., ‘Deconstruction’, The Software Toolworks Multimedia Encyclopedia, CDROM version (Novato 1992).Google Scholar See also Ellis, John, Against Deconstruction (Princeton 1989)Google Scholar and Rosenau, Pauline Marie, Post-Modemism and the Social Sciences: The Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions (Princeton 1992)Google Scholar.

2 Man, Paul de (born 1919 in Antwerp, died in New Haven (USA) 1983):Google Scholar professor of humanistic studies at Johns Hopkins University until 1970, when he joined the faculty of Yale University. At the time of his death he was Yale's Sterling Professor of Humanities and chairman of the dept. of comparative literature.

3 Quote from Yagoda, Ben, ‘After years of theory, educators return to the fact of the matter’, News and Observer (11 11 1994) 17A,Google Scholar 20A.

4 The Promise and Dilemma of Subaltern Studies: Perspectives from Latin American History’, American Historical Review 99/5 (12 1994) 1514.Google Scholar See also Beverley, John, Oviedo, Jose, and Arrona, Michael eds., The Postmodernism Debate in Latin America (Durham 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Barzun, Jacques and Graaff, Henry F., The Modern Researcher (1957)Google Scholar.

6 Huey Long (1893–1935), Governor of the State of Louisiana.

7 Womack, John, Zapata y la Revolution Mexicana (1969)Google Scholar.

8 Knight, Alan, The Mexican Revolution (1986)Google Scholar.

9 Palmer, Bryan, Descent into Discourse (Temple 1990)Google Scholar.

10 Scott, Joan, ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’, AHR 91 (12. 1986) 10531075Google Scholar.

11 Cf. Paul Dosal, 16-FEB-95 7:04.

12 Ginzburg, Carlo, The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller (London 1980)Google Scholar.

13 Adorno, Rolena, Cronistay Principe: La obra de don Felipe Guamdn Pomade Ayala (Lima 1989)Google Scholar.

14 Seed, Patricia, To Love, Honor and Obey in Colonial Mexico: Conflict over Marriage Choice, 1574–1821 (Stanford 1988)Google Scholar.

15 Gilbert Joseph, ‘Banditry’, Latin American Research Review.

16 Bulnes, Francisco, El Verdtidero Juarez y la verdad sobre la intervencion y el Imperio (Mexico 1984)Google Scholar.

17 Ozouf, Mona, among others: La fete revolulionnaire (Paris 1976)Google Scholar.

18 See Foster, Hal ed., The Anti-Aesthetic (1983)Google Scholar and Wallis, Brian ed., Art after Modernism (1984)Google Scholar.